Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton will never concede and this is all about her run for 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Obamamaniac_25 Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:45 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton will never concede and this is all about her run for 2012
Edited on Tue May-20-08 09:47 AM by Obamamaniac_25
She'll lose the nomination yes but will she concede and help Senator Obama win the nomination? No. Judging by her actions of the last few days and by such key supporters of hers such as Geraldine Ferraro saying they may note vote for Senator Obama, by claiming a popular vote victory by counting the soviet style election that took place with only her name and Dennis Kucinich's on the ballot and assuming that no one in Michigan intended to vote for Senator Obama, by launching an attack on the legiitmacy of Senator Obama's caucus victories, by laying the groundwork to quietly whisper that Senator Obama stole the nomination from her because she would have had it if Michigan and Florida were seated and by even going to Florida tommorow to rail against the Democratic party and against Obama demanding that they count an election that was clearly against the rules. Her minions are busy spinning. Her campaign shows zero signs of getting ready to concede.

Please be under no illusions. Senator Clinton will take this all the way to the 1st ballot in Denver. It'll be a repeat of 1980. Senator Obama will have trouble finding her on the stage after his win just like President Carter had trouble finding Senator Kennedy on the stage. She and her minions will whisper to the press all general election season long about all the mistakes they perceive Senator Obama to be making hoping against hope that Senator Obama loses.

Senator Clinton will do NOTHING to unite this party should she lose. She'll take it all the way to the convention and she'll perfunctorily campaign for Senator Obama AT BEST after. She's not a team player. This is all about her. Even in the 1990s, the Clintons were good for 1 thing only. The Clintons were good for the Clintons and the Clintons alone while we lost dozens of governorships, house and senate seats.

Bill and Hillary Clinton care about one thing and one thing alone: Themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Her only hope of ever running again is to get out in June and campaign for Obama. Anything less
and she can kiss her dreams of being President goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamamaniac_25 Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But why is she spouting all this
and I'm sorry for being blunt but all this bullshit about leading in the popular vote if she doesn't plan to take it to the bitter end on August 28th? Also, saying 2,209 delegates is the winning margin as well. Etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Rules committee meets on 5/31
That will put to bed this 2,209 crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. She may be effectively shut down quite soon by SD announcements
Soo if she wants to get her digs in against Obama and spread the idea that the nomination was really still up for grabs after Oregon and that she was unfairly forced out of the race, she'll need to do most of her poison spreading now and in the near term. Maintaining the pretense that she could somehow take a viable candidacy all the way to the convention would be necessary to create the "we wuz robbed!" mythology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I said this weeks ago and my thread was LOCKED as "flamebait"...
You're spot on, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamamaniac_25 Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep, BTW
I'm not saying this as flamebait. Anyone who saw how hard the Clintons fought during impeachment, post 1994, in the 1992 campaign crisis, etc., can tell that they will never surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Good thing you weren't tombstoned like the OP in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. As did I n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually she's angling to be Queen of the Universe for Life
she's battling the forces of the Cult and unlike your claim that she only cares about herself, cult members care only about everybody in the universe except themselves and their God. Thanks for the Tuesday Morning chuckle. I HOPE you all continue to post in the sincere effort to UNIFY us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Absolutely correct. If you think she will put her best foot forward for another president within
the Democratic party you have got another thing coming. She is still as hapless as her war vote suggests she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. She can scream and holler all she wants
She IS trying to sabotage Obama, BUT....she will NEVER...EVER get the nomination for Prez in the Democratic Party after this year...she has made so many enemies, she is lucky she retains her Senate seat....she has a lot of work to do just to stay viable as a Senator....she can sabotage all she wants....the SPINELESS Dem leadership has let her get away with all of her racist crap, that they ARE PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ....they better get their act together, the ClintonS are megalomaniacs.........they are hiddeous, I can't believe we ever defended them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamamaniac_25 Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Speaking of spineless democratic leadership
After a 16 month primary, Al Gore still isn't sure which candidate he supports according to a new article today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe it's all about denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. She has a dilemna. If she pouts and does not help Obama,
she will find party support hard to come by later. If he wins, it is almost impossible to run against your own incumbent in 2012. Should she drop out to run as an independent, she can forget about winning her next Senate election.
As I see it, the best scenario for her is to be seen valiantly supporting Obama, but McCain to win the general election. That way, she gets to run again in four years, (maybe) without having pissed the party off too much. If she plans to undermine Obama in the GE, it will be subtle, without her fingerprints on any actions.
As for the Clintons caring only about themselves, that has always been the case. To them, loyalty flows only one way; toward them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. 1990's
Where did all the Clinton love go? In the 1990's Dems seemed united that he was a great president, and that the country was great under him. Now so many people are bashing the Clintons. Why? Just because they dare to campaign against your darling?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I voted for Clinton twice. I supported him vocally through the impeachment
I think he was a good president. I am disgusted with Hillary's campaign tactics, particularly since she is a strong candidate who didn't need to resort to negatives and tearing down her opponent. Her campaign would have been more successful, and she could have been the nominee, had she campaigned on her strengths and not stooped to Republican tactics that turned many people away from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think Bill Clinton was a fantastic president
But I do not believe that carries over to his wife. Sen. Clinton came into this race with high negatives, and has only made it worse as she's gone on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Bill Clinton's not running for re-election.
His wife is, and they're different people.

Furthermore, Clinton's made a real jackass of himself lately.

Furthermore, Obama's campaign is far more like Clinton's in '92 then Hillary's is now.

Furthermore, Clinton spent 6 years as a lame duck. His presidency wasn't all that great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Um, not all of us had such a great time during the 90's.
Factories shut down. Fast Cash places everywhere. NAFTA affected my home area in a BIG way.

Bill Clinton ran as a progressive and governed as a fiscal conservative. He betrayed the party and put us through a HUGE scandal.

So, yeah, no love. Sorry. I know you'd like to pigeonhole me with some sort of Obama worship, but if it wasn't Obama, I'd vote for another Democratic alternative. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. You obviously read OpenLeft. No original thoughts of your own? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why say she's strong with what is mostly about Clinton brand advantage?
Her different persona each primary, overstating her experience in ways that hurt her, using feminism and not helping it or respecting it?

I am so tried of Barack Obama not getting the respect he deserves for the winning he has been doing, against all odds. The NC win and photo finish in IN was huge after all that preceded. His no drama Obama temperament, and really thoughtful and deep understanding of so many issues, yet still an incredible communicator.

There are many more ways to say OH, PA, TX should have been bigger for Hillary, who never polls beyond the 40s she started with.

What makes anyone think Hillary deserves another shot in 2012, or are the Dem leadership treading way too carefully out of fear or respect?

John Kerry probably won, but for lack of support among the party during the campaign or in securing the infrastructure and polls leading up to the election. A campaign that the Clintonistas during and immediately insulted, that seems far better than theirs and in comparison. His primary team was great, but adding others who didn't know about him or care about him remind us of the challenge we face again.

His help to Obama has been amazingly smart and strong, being on board early, and his initial words on the Iran dust-up perfect. Many here preferred Biden's two words BS slams, but where is the respect and position for statesman and advocate Kerry? But we have to part the waters for Hillary?

Totally lost my patience about this campaign being all about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. I assume Hillary and her supporters will work their asses off for Obama
I am giving them the benefit of the doubt that they care about the country.

If they do not -- if there is any indication that Hillary and her supporters have sabotaged the GE for Obama, I will do everything I can to see that (a) she does not run in 2012 and (b) she loses her Senate seat.

I will work my ass off and donate as much as I can to see that happen. If I have to move to New York and spend three months ringing doorbells, I will do it.

Quite frankly, if we don't get a Democrat in the White House this year, it really won't matter who is elected in 2012. The game will be over by then.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Then all we will have as a choice is to *minimize HRC's influence* ?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yep - exactly right. K & R. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. After the Denver ballot...
...don't be surprised if she sues the party for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merkins Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
25. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Of course she'll support the nominee when the time comes...
right now she doesn't have to.

The time will come when the Dems, including the Clintons, will get behind and support the nominee as expected.

If she didn't do that, it would make her a pariah in the Dem party. She'd lose a lot of power which she cannot afford...especially if she's thinking of running again in the future.

Not supporting the Dem nominee would be a nail in the coffin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think so. Even her supporters are saying it will go to June 4th. After that I think
the SDs will end it if she won't concede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. She is a horrible person. Not often you run accross a person so devoid or morals or ethics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Never Forget!
HRC could have handled this with grace, instead she is running for 2012. Please don't let her get away with it. I would hope everyone here will remember what she pulled in 2008 if, should Obama lose, she tries to run again in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. There's NO WAY IN HELL black people would vote for her in 2012? NO WAY IN HELL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. how do you know?
are black people that easy to figure out for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. Randi Rhodes was suggesting that she's either trying to force herself to be Obama's running mate...
or she's gonna pull a Lieberman and run as an independent.

IIRC, aren't there sore loser laws in a bunch of states that would prevent this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I heard that too, and it sounds just like something she'd do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
35. Even if she is completely self absorbed
She may realize that she has nothing to gain by trying to sap Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well whatever it is, she will stay till the last dog dies and that is
Edited on Wed May-21-08 01:10 AM by BenDavid
a good thing....Kinda funny though when the presumptive nominee cannot win all the states this late in the campaign. Does kinda show his weakness... Since 2/19 HRC had beaten bho in total delegates and votes and that in and of itself shoudl be a wakeup call to folks. bho cannot win the general election. If you cannot pull in 35 to 40% of the so called blue collar voters in key states a dem must win then it tis over.bho would need an estimated 40 million AA votes nation wide to make up the difference and that will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. I personally think her delegates have the right to stand up for their candidate--
--one last time on the first ballot. We can all do the unity thing on the second ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC