Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Winning Uncommitted Delegates: What Happened in 1976

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:07 PM
Original message
Winning Uncommitted Delegates: What Happened in 1976
The current primary race reminds me a little of Reagan's contest against Ford in 1976. As the challenger in the Republican primaries, Reagan ran very strongly in the primaries and prevented Ford from obtaining an outright majority going into the convention. Reagan, however, did not have a majority himself, so there was a battle royale for the remaining uncommitted delegates leading up to the convention.

As the incumbent, Ford "used all of the perks and patronage of the Presidency to win over wavering delegates, including trips aboard Air Force One and personal meetings with the President himself.' Wikipedia

Reagan, OOH, tried everything to woo uncommitted delegates even break off some of Ford's delegates, who were seen as less personally committed. Reagan tried to convince people that he had gotten enough private commitments from the remaining delegates to hold a majority. He named Richard Schweiker as his running mate to appeal to moderates and Pennsylvanians (a move which actually backfired among the base). Reagan then tried to force a rule change which would have forced Ford to choose a VP and possibly lose some delegates.

My point is that while the current primary season has been agonizingly long, there is nothing unprecedented in a tough fight even after the battle appears to be lost. The 1972 Democratic convention had some even more dramatic events, but I've been waiting for better understanding for Humphrey's attempt to challenge the California delegation.

While I was young and ill informed in 1976, I remember very little resentment against Reagan for engaging in a political street fight over delegates.

I suspect the different public mood in 2008 has to do less with the specifics and more with the fact that the sheer length of the primary season creates a longing for it to be over and with Reagan's greater natural political abilities.

http://www.npr.org/news/national/election2000/conventions/past.reagan_ford.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you sure pointing towards a contested race where that party lost the GE
...is a good idea?

Is this the template we really want to follow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Doubt That Had Anything to Do with The General Election
I don't think anyone at the time thought the primary fight weakenend Ford substantially. Ford lost on his own efforts and his own merit.

What may be most pertinent is the widespread fatigue with the GOP and voter dissatisfaction over the administration's handling of an unpopular war and the corruption of the last president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
Late-night post that may have gotten buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC