Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chuck Hagel Takes On McCain, Repeatedly Praises Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:40 AM
Original message
Chuck Hagel Takes On McCain, Repeatedly Praises Obama
Chuck Hagel is quickly becoming Barack Obama's answer to Joe Lieberman.

The Republican Senator from Nebraska was a political thorn in McCain's side on Tuesday night, repeatedly lavishing praise on the presumptive Democratic candidate and levying major foreign policy criticisms at the GOP nominee and the Republican Party as a whole. At one point, Hagel even urged the Arizona Republican to elevate his campaign discourse to a higher, more honest level.

"We know from past campaigns that presidential candidates will say many things," Hagel said of some of McCain's recent rhetoric, namely his policy on talking to Iran. "But once they have the responsibility to govern the country and lead the world, that difference between what they said and what responsibilities they have to fulfill are vastly different. I'm very upset with John with some of the things he's been saying. And I can't get into the psychoanalysis of it. But I believe that John is smarter than some of the things he is saying. He is, he understands it more. John is a man who reads a lot, he's been around the world. I want him to get above that and maybe when he gets into the general election, and becomes the general election candidate he will have a higher-level discourse on these things."


Hagel, speaking to a small gathering at the residence of the Italian ambassador, took umbrage with several positions taken by the McCain campaign, including the Arizona Senator's criticism of Obama for pledging to engage with Iran. Engagement is not, and should not be confused for, capitulation, he argued.

"I never understand how anyone in any realm of civilized discourse could sort through the big issues and challenges and threats and figure out how to deal with those without engaging in some way...."

Hagel then offered a wry tweak of his GOP colleague. "I am confident that if Obama is elected president that is the approach we will take. And my friend John McCain said some other things about that. We'll see, but in my opinion it has to be done. It is essential."

Hagel, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, went on to belittle the tendency for some within his own party to disparage those who tout diplomacy. "You take some risks in talking about this," he said, "especially in the Congress, because you can immediately be branded as an appeaser."


And when asked to respond to rumors circulating within political circles that the Bush administration was ginning up the possibility of war with Iran, the Senator even raised the specter of impeachment.


"You've got the power of impeachment, now that is a very defined measure if you are willing to bring charges against the president at all. You can't just say I disagree with him, let's impeach him," said Hagel. An attack on Iran without Congress' consent, he added, "would bring with it... outstanding political consequences, including for the Republican Party."

Finally, he charged that if the preeminent foreign policy objective is to achieve security in Israel and stability within the broader Middle East, then the Bush track -- which McCain has endorsed -- is ill-advised.

"If you engage a world power or a rival, it doesn't mean you agree with them or subscribe with what they believe or you support them in any way," he said. "What it does tell you is that you've got a problem you need to resolve. And you've got to understand the other side and the other side has got to understand you."



Much of Hagel's address, hosted by the Ploughshares Fund, was spent weaving between Obama praise and McCain quips. He urged the media, for example, to focus on important policy issues an "not just why Barack wear flag pins on his lapel."


Asked whether he would be open to serving as Secretary of Defense in a hypothetical Obama administration, Hagel demurred. But in the process, he praised the Illinois Democrat for being open to a bipartisan cabinet.

"Take me out of the equation," he said, "I do think that the next president and Obama has talked about this, and McCain not as much, I think he is going to have to put together a very wide, smart, experienced, credible, bipartisan cabinet. And that is going to be required absolutely."



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/20/chuck-hagel-takes-on-mcca_n_102775.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. There was a time when Hagel was one of McCains closest friends in the Senate
This has to hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That McCain is long gone. The Skull & Bones already took the paddle to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. It probably hurts Hagel a lot too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. McCain picks Lieberman, Obama picks Hagel.
A bipartisan arms race. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hagel as an Obama VP??? OMG...what a thought....Can Hagel really be a DEM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Nope. He adds Foreign policy creds and may attract Neocon-hating repugs
But having a repug VP would give too much incentive for the GOP to "get rid of" Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Intrigue from Roman Times continue to Present Society
Its the SPICE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Can he run for VP on both Obama and Bloomberg's ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Mc3 continues to spout crap and Chuck is embarrassed no end...Mc3 is out of step and off key
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hagel's angling for VP. Despite his abysmal conservative voting record, I do think
an Obama/Hagel ticket is a big-time winner in November.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No way in hell would the DNC let a Republican be next in line to POTUS. C'mon
The guy is against the war. Big whoop. He's a Republican 99% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. exactly the VP casts votes that break ties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Well yeah. Imagine them trying to label Obama as "too liberal" with Hagel on the ticket.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 01:43 AM by anonymous171
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. I Don't Understand
Hagel is a right wing voter and only breaks with Bush on Iraq.

How could that be good for the Dem Party? My God, check out his voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think that they would ever let him be VP, and I'm kinda glad
But I do accept him as a Republican judas who can trash McCain! Fuck Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. There ya go...I accept anyone who's
telling the truth..what a concept in this day and age of trying to thrive on LIV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Hagel
He won't be VP.But,don't be surprised to see him campaign for Obama and when Obama Is elected he Is picked as Defense Secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, he's our counter to Lieberman.
I hope he gets more air time going forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Come to us, Hagel... come to us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. One can dream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Even republicans know that they need to start getting ready for heavy dem majorites in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. I wonder what job Hagel is sucking-up for?
Edited on Wed May-21-08 08:09 AM by DemVet
Veep?

SecDef?

SecState?

edit...typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. SecDef
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Wouldn't doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. He's like Zell Miller, only grown up, civilized, and sane.
Does this mean Diebold will be on OUR side this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC