Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BARACK OBAMA WHITE HOUSE: Cabinet/Appointments/Etc Suggestions by Restate Democrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:27 AM
Original message
BARACK OBAMA WHITE HOUSE: Cabinet/Appointments/Etc Suggestions by Restate Democrat
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:07 PM by redstate_democrat

President Barack Obama


Vice President Wesley Clark


Secretary of State Bill Richardson


National Security Adviser- Richard Clarke


DEPUTY National Security Adviser - Susan Rice


Chief of Staff - David Axelrod!!!


Press Secretary- Robert Gibbs


Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel


Attorney General- Janet Napolitano


NEW POVERTY CZAR - John Edwards


Senate Majority Leader - Hillary Clinton


Secretary of Health and Human Services- Gov. Howard Dean


Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services -Jeanne Lambrew


Secretary of Treasury- Daniel Tarullo


Secretary of Commerce - Austan Goolsbee


Secretary of Energy - Denis McDonough


Secretary of Labor- Cassandra Butts


HUD Secretary - Susan Wartell


Secretary of Education - Linda Darling-Hammond


Secretary of Homeland Security - Richard Danzig


Supreme Court Appointee - Judge Myron H. Thompson - 11th Circuit

-OR-


Ann Claire Williams - 7th Circuit

-AND -


Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw - 9th Circuit - Hispanic judge likely to be nominated for Supreme Court by a Democratic President


Secretary of Transportation

Secretary of the Interior

Secretary of Agriculture

Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would like to see Biden in there
But I can see where he may find himself in a better position staying in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If Biden can't be president, we need him in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. If Hillary can't be vice president, we need her in the Senate.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 11:44 AM by Radio_Lady
But your suggestion is wise also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I made her Senate Majority Leader.
I have that kind of power, ya know.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. That's absurd - The last thing the country needs is a closed government Dem in charge of senate when
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:41 PM by blm
the investigations of BushInc need full cooperation for a change.

NO Bushprotecting Democrat who sides with the secrecy and privilege of closed government should be in any position where they control the purse strings and the viability of the senate investigations that are needed to get this country back on track with a solid foundation based in honest and open government.

NO CLINTONS will serve this country and its laws more than they serve the privilege of the Bushes and their powerful cronies.

Dick Durbin will be the obvious choice for senate leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. I agree. I really don't want her to serve in that role either. Besides, she
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:37 PM by Truth Hurts A Lot
only joined the Senate for the purpose of becoming president one day. Once that fantasy is over with, will she really even do her Senate job correctly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #47
63. Dick Durbin or Dodd
But you know Hillary has to be offered something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. Why? She should be lucky to keep her seat after all the deceit towards other Dems
and the Dem party the Clintons have perpetrated over the years.

I want Clintons exposed completely as the Bushprotecting tools they have been, not given any more power than they have right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
75. Dodd or Feingold for me... Offer her help getting NY governorship...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Richard Clarke will have a prominent roll
He is Obama's leading national security advisor right now.

Either VP, NSA or Homeland Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That would be awesome, swap him in place of Susan Rice and make her his deputy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Richard Clarke is my homie
When he talks, I listen. I highly recommend his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Put Clarke @ National Security Adviser - No-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Fixed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
64. I'd like to see Ray McGovern or Sibel Edmonds in some prominent security advisory roles...
Perhaps National Security Advisor. Perhaps Homeland Security or other security positions.

I think if we could get one of those two in some prominent roles there, it would go a long ways to helping restore the public's faith in our intelligence agencies not being the Big Brother menace they are now under Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. COOL!
David Axelrod looks great in that pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton cannot be our HHS sec.
She is far to big a player to be buried in a somewhat obscure cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. She would be able to get everything she wants as far as health care and she is a policy wonk of sort
she would get her stuff through during his administration and then be set to run again in 2016 with a full record of what she did as Secretary of HHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think that if a 2016 run is what you're looking for, then she's better to stay in the senate
In 8 years she could be a real power player there and her profile would be much larger than as a cabinet secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Okay then lets make her Senate Majority Leader
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I can get down with that. Particularly since Mr. Reid has got to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. nah. she's not good at working in such a role
and this is it for Clinton- and she knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. But she could bash some repug heads in the senate for us
and get through the important legislation we need to get through immediately. Since a lot of repugs in the senate claim to like her now, it should be a good role for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. when has she ever bashed repuke heads?
and look, Dr. Howard Dean has had more success reforming healthcare than practically anyone out there. And he brings a physician's perspective. Also, he's run large organizations successfully. He has a track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Okay
He can have it if he wants it. You convinced me!

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. imagine this

SENATE MAJORITY LEADER


Speaker of the House


Monumental
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
81. She has NEVER taken on the GOP or BushInc on any issue for 7yrs. She attacked other Dems
at the drop of a pronoun with more venom than she ever once went after Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. I hope Kucinich is given input
and his ideas are listened to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
56. I'd put Dennis Kucinich in as the Secretary of the new Department of Peace...
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:42 PM by calipendence
This has been lobbied for for the last few years, and its finally time to put it in place, and I can't think of a better person to head it up than Dennis. Especially if you're even thinking of putting in Chuck Hagel in for the Department of Defense. By having Hagel and Kucinich both in key positions advising on conditions of war and peace, I think it would be a good and needed counterbalance of opinions for Obama to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. That's a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Cut a deal with Ralph Nader and make him head of the EPA...

If you can cut a deal with Nader and give him ONE plank that I'd think might get him to come over to do some constructive things (which he WOULD do in the EPA). Put National Instant Runoff Voting on the Democratic Party agenda!

That way, if Nader were ever to run in the future again, he wouldn't hurt the party, but HELP them make sure we have honest poltiicians running in all races that are accountable if others can threaten their positions besides Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. excellent idea
I like the combination as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Secretary of Fine Arts.....George Clinton
kidding, but for the serious nods. I'd like to see him put some scientists or environmentalists in EPA, FDA and such.

I would also like to see a true progressive head up Interior- maybe appoint someone from the Crow or Sioux tribes to BIA. A lot of people are hopeful that this can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
61. Gore would be awesome at the EPA but I guess he's doing his own thing right now
and plus, he was a former VP and presidential candidate, it would kind of be beneath him. But just think if he was. He would BASH SOME HEADS for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good list...
except for Clinton. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Some good choices, but I'd make one change...
I'd like to see Mike Bloomberg in at either Treasury or Commerce.

Hagel as SecDef is fucking BRILLIANT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Lets make put him on the President's Board for Economics
Edited on Wed May-21-08 11:48 AM by redstate_democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
67. I'd like Ravi Batra in either Treasury or Commerce positions...
He has a real handle on what the coming recession/depression is and I think could really help Obama build a proper new "New Deal" package to fix things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. um, no thanks.
your choices look pretty nutty to me. I'd much prefer

VP- Joe Biden
SoS- OK, I'm down with Richardson
NSA- Susan Rice
SoD- not Hagel
AG- John Edwards
HHS- Howard Dean. Hillary would NEVER take a 2nd tier cabinet position and she doesn't have the record of success reforming health care that howard does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Biden has repeatedly said...
NO to VP. I'd prefer him as State or remaining in the Senate - wherever HE thinks he could best serve.

What's your prob with Hagel @ Defense?

I agree w/ Edwards @ AG; just not sure he'd take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. that's always said but not always meant.
I'd rather see a repuke cabinet member in a back bench seat. And I have no use for Hagel. He's a wingnut. I also think we need someone at HHS with experience in running large organizations and with a proven record in healthcare reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Ok
you would prefer Susan Rice over Clarke? I had her down as NSA at first but then someone suggested Clarke.

I prefer Edwards or Napolitano at AG, but since Edwards is key on poverty issues and if there will be a poverty czar, he should be IT.

SoD- I think Hagel would be fine. He brings that bipartisanship to the table.

Howard Dean would be cool for HHS, but Lambrew was key in Clinton's administration for SCHIP and so forth. She actually worked to craft a lot of the legislation and worked in OMB, HHS, and so forth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Delete-Dupe. nt
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:12 PM by impeachdubya


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. Even leaving aside his ego & propensity to stick foot in mouth, I'm not that enamored of Biden.
I think Richardson, Clark, Boxer, Feingold, Dodd or even Webb would all be better choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. If Obama appoints even 1 rethug ...I will not vote for him
That's where I draw my line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. But Clinton's SoD was a rethug.
I think if Hagel is offered that, he could totally disable McCain on the campaign trail for us. Sort of do a Liarberman for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
48. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. bwahahah. more threats from you.
Hillykins would almost certainly have appointed a repuke. Presidents from both parties almost invariably do. Bill Cohen ring any bells?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. cali, I beginning to feel a bit like your old bone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
50. But you already side with those Dems who protected BushInc and the fascist agenda the most.
So.....why would the appointment of a Republican who AGREES with Obama in some area be a line in the sand for you?

Isn't siding with Bushprotecting traitors as far as one can go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
84. so, you didn't vote for Bill Clinton when he appointed a GOP SOD?
strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. Edwards as AG, and not a republican in sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
57. Napolitano has experience being an AG
and Edwards would be great to be the first Poverty czar. That is an honor and he would do great work heading that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. Biden for VP
He will call them on their BS and save a lot of time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady-Damai Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. Very Nice.... me likey....THE FUTURE LOOKS GREAT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. VP- Bill Richardson. Senate Majority Leader- Chris Dodd.
Put Biden on Defense.

Atty General: I think we would have trouble doing better than John Edwards.

I like Wes Clark, too, but I think Richardson is more likely for the Veep slot.

I also think we should put Willie Nelson in charge of the DEA; he can begin dismantling it, and finding those people productive employment elsewhere. :hippie:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. How about Barney Frank at the DEA?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Works for me.
Barney's a smart dude. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I would like Biden at VP but this needs to be some sort of UNITY ticket so I Wesley Clarke would be
my choice for that.

The Clintons hate Richardson now and her supporters probably do as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. I would like Biden for either VP or SOS, but I think Hagel would
do well as SoD to neutralize McCain. Biden would be great there too, but he is so influential in the Senate, he needs a big power role in order to give up his senate position. Since SoD is the only place I would allow a Repug, I guess Hagel has to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I certainly wouldn't want an anti-choicer like Hagel anywhere near domestic social policy.
I'd really like to see Chris Dodd get the recognition he deserves, too. He stood up strong on FISA.

Russ Feingold would make a fine Senate Majority leader, also!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. Chief of Staff = Pete Rouse
The same Chief of Staff he's had in the Senate (Senator Obama's first choice), the same Chief of Staff that's keeping the wheels on the campaign in the Chicago offices, the 40 year worker for Democratic senators who knows where every skeleton is buried on Capital Hill. The guy you've never heard of who has probably influenced and guided most of the legislation you like and fought the stuff you don't like.

Google him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. I've heard the name before.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:36 PM by redstate_democrat
hmmmm



Pete Rouse


Pete Rouse is the Outsider's Insider, a fixer steeped in the ways of a Washington that Obama has been both eager to learn and quick to publicly condemn. The meticulous workaholic rose through three decades of unglamorous legislating to become arguably the most influential Democratic aide in the Senate when he worked for then-Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.).

"His familiarity with Washington makes him somebody whose judgment I trust," Obama said. And yet this is the Washington of "cheap political points" and "petty" partisanship that figures prominently in Obama's public speeches these days. "I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington," Obama tells his audiences. "But I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change."

That has made Rouse's job of introducing Obama to Capitol Hill a complicated balancing act: He seeks to burnish Obama's still-modest credentials as a freshman senator while preventing the talented but inexperienced politician from making the kind of mistakes that have denied every senator since John F. Kennedy the presidency. "My role," he said with classic staffer discretion, is simply "to help him accomplish his priorities."

Others credit their unlikely pairing -- Rouse, a stubby 61-year-old, first started work in the Senate in 1971, when Obama was a 10-year-old in Hawaii with basketball dreams -- with helping to fuel Obama's turbocharged rise to become one of the leading candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. "Barack Obama's rapid political ascent would not have been possible without Pete," said Jim Jordan, a Democratic strategist who has worked with Rouse and is now advising the campaign of Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.).

At his campaign headquarters in Chicago, Obama has assembled a strong team of political veterans to complement -- and at times, compete with -- Rouse's formidable Washington experience. His campaign manager is David Plouffe, and a top strategist is David Axelrod, two longtime Democratic operatives and former partners in a political consulting firm. A third influential campaign voice is that of Robert Gibbs, who was Sen. John F. Kerry's presidential campaign press secretary in 2003; he travels full time with Obama as the campaign's communications director.

Plouffe and Axelrod have pushed the candidate away from traditional Democratic constituency-group politics, convinced that Obama is a unique figure who shouldn't expect significant backing from the Democratic establishment and won't need it anyway.

As the center of gravity in Obama's world shifts away from Capitol Hill and toward his campaign headquarters, Rouse has been carefully monitoring the increasingly anti-Washington tone. When, for example, Obama's campaign team wanted him to propose banning anyone who serves in his administration from lobbying it after leaving, Rouse warned about the consequences: a recruiting problem for the Obama White House.

The campaign announced it anyway.
Building a Reputation

Three years ago, Obama was serving in the Illinois state Senate; Rouse was running the office of Daschle, the U.S. Senate majority leader, and hoping to steer his boss and longtime patron to the presidency. Then Daschle lost his reelection bid in 2004 -- the same year Obama won his Senate seat.

After Daschle lost, he had hoped Rouse would join him working outside of government; the two remain close. But that November, Cassandra Butts, a friend of Obama's since they were students at Harvard Law School together, called Rouse about meeting with Obama. It was a long shot to think he would work for a freshman senator, but worth it, she figured.

So Obama, the charismatic rising star who was being deluged with resumes from people eager to work for him and requests from magazines that wanted him on their covers, went to work trying to persuade a man 15 years his senior to help him.

Obama, first made famous by his rousing oration at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, joked with Rouse that "I can give a good speech" but said he knew little about organizing a Senate office.

"What I want do is form a partnership," Obama said.

In hiring Rouse, whose mother was Japanese and whose father is white, Obama turned down several black candidates (there are only a few black chiefs of staff in the Senate) who sought the post but had less experience.

"The only possible negative was, thinking of Barack as a new kind of politician, you're choosing someone who is very rooted in the Senate and the ways of Washington," said Butts of picking Rouse. "That was a con in perception that we could live with when his pros were so obvious."

With help from Gibbs and Axelrod, Rouse wrote a detailed memo for Obama's first year in the Senate. What they came to call "The Strategic Plan" laid out for Obama the approach adopted by Hillary Rodham Clinton when she entered the Senate in 2001: Show respect to other senators even though you're a star, don't let your constituents think you are forgetting them, and find ways to build relationships with colleagues, particularly those in the opposite party.

Under Rouse's guidance, Obama built close relations with one of the most conservative members of the Senate, Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), working with him to pass a bill that creates a Google-like search system and database to help Americans easily search government spending. He worked with another Republican, Sen. Richard G. Lugar (Ind.), to increase U.S. funding to find and dispose of loose antiaircraft missiles and other weapons in the former Soviet Union.

This approach created some vulnerabilities for Obama as a potential 2008 candidate. His focus on becoming an effective senator rather than a liberal fire-breather did not endear him to the left-leaning bloggers who have become an increasingly important constituency in the Democratic Party.

Obama had always opposed the Iraq war, one of the left's biggest issues, but in his first two years in the Senate, he did not make it his focus. He gave few speeches on the war and voted for funding it while opposing timetables for withdrawal -- both stances that he has reversed since he started running for president.

On an issue even more delicate on the Hill, Rouse warned Obama to be careful how he pursued congressional ethics legislation -- a cause bound to irritate some other senators. Obama, pushed by Gibbs, went as far as voting against an ethics bill that most Senate Democrats supported last year, although under Rouse's guidance, he steered clear of publicly criticizing Democratic Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) for what he felt was a weak bill.

When the Senate last month approved a bill that banned lawmakers from flying on corporate jets at discounted rates and required disclosure of the names of lobbyists who also serve as "bundlers," rounding up contributions for candidates, Obama touted his role in getting it passed.

"Pete knows that when you're first elected to the Senate, you've got to pay your dues, visit with senior senators and deliver for your home state," said Chris Lu, Obama's legislative director. "But Pete recognized that Obama's appeal was that he was an outsider and would never be a typical senator, so Pete helped Obama find the delicate balance between being a rank-and-file senator and high-profile national figure."
Building a Campaign

By last fall, two years after he was elected to the Senate, Obama had a second best-selling book, received invitations to speak even in conservative states such as Nebraska and was starting to seriously consider a run for the White House, far sooner than he -- or Rouse -- had anticipated.

Rouse, who organized a presidential operation in 2002 for Daschle before the South Dakotan decided not to run, swung into action. In September, when Obama decided to travel to Iowa to test the waters, Rouse called Steve Hildebrand, an old friend from the Daschle operation who ran Al Gore's Iowa campaign in 2000, to show him around the state, even though the pair had never met.

"I thought, let's have a little fun with this. I wanted to create a little buzz," Rouse said. And he did.

Three other campaigns quickly called Hildebrand, wanting to hire him before Obama formally decided to enter the race.

In November, when more than a dozen advisers met with Obama in Axelrod's Chicago office to discuss running, it was Rouse who had prepared the memos detailing how Obama could win and the pros and cons of running in 2008 versus waiting.

And after Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) decided against a presidential bid in December, it was Rouse who called Bayh's communications director, Dan Pfeiffer, the next day. Rouse, who had hired Pfeiffer in 2002 for what they thought would be Daschle's presidential campaign, wanted him to join the Obama team.

"Do you know what a sense of d�j� vu I'm having?" Pfeiffer asked Rouse.

This time, though, Rouse's man was running. And the team of advisers that Rouse had built for Daschle would prove key at a time when many top Democratic operatives, veterans of the Clinton White House, were signing up for Hillary Clinton's campaign. Rouse personally recruited several Daschle veterans, including Pfeiffer; Hildebrand, who now manages Obama's operations in the early states such as Iowa; and Julianna Smoot, who directs the campaign's prodigious fundraising.

When Daschle was considering whom to support for president, Rouse recruited him, too, telling his old boss that they needed his endorsement early to show that Obama had the backing of some key Establishment figures. Daschle obliged, announcing his support for Obama in February; now, he has occasional dinners with the candidate to advise him on policy.

As the campaign heats up and the Senate continues to focus on Iraq, a key campaign issue, there is constant lobbying on all sides for Obama's time. Rouse, aware that the Senate's Democratic leaders often need the candidates in town to help them prevail on close votes, frequently wants him on Capitol Hill. Advisers in the early states argue that he should be in the places where the campaign is being waged, while the Chicago staff is wary of Obama skipping events by groups in the Democratic Party and leaving them feeling snubbed.

While Obama was in Southeast Washington giving a campaign speech on urban poverty last month, Rouse was imploring Gibbs to make sure that the senator didn't miss a vote that was happening across town -- the Democratic leadership needed Obama's vote to win. Obama, who has missed 59 votes this year, compared with Clinton's 11, did miss that vote, but because a Republican missed it too, the Democrats still won.

"On these tough votes," said one of Obama's top Senate aides, "he has to be here. There are votes you just can't miss."

Even with Obama increasingly absent, Rouse plays a major advisory role. In June, as aides worried that Obama's media operation wasn't responding quickly enough to the veteran Clinton team, Rouse helped engineer a shift in roles: Gibbs, who has worked with Obama since the 2004 Senate campaign, would travel with the candidate, while Pfeiffer would return from the road and help manage the media office in Chicago.

And Rouse continues to educate Obama on how to be an effective senator. Weeks before Obama announced in January that he was forming a presidential exploratory committee, Rouse told his boss to meet with Edward M. Kennedy and Joseph I. Lieberman, two senators who were taking over committees on which Obama serves, to show that he still respected his more senior colleagues. He arrived with signed copies of his best-selling book "The Audacity of Hope" that they could give to others.

There have been limits, though, to Rouse's success at forging close ties between Obama and his Senate colleagues. In the race for senators' endorsements, Obama has received just one: that of his fellow Illinois Democrat, Sen. Richard J. Durbin.

Then again, even that may be a Rouse special. Durbin's chief of staff back when he was a congressman? Pete Rouse.

View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. I think Axelrod is a rock star and should have a prominent
position as a political adivser. I think Pete would run the staff better, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
52. SWAP OUT AXELROD
and make Peter Rouse Chief of Staff

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. Nice work. I would put Wes Clark as Sec of Defense, VP as Biden or Webb
and find a nice Peace/Diplomacy department for Kucinich (maybe, if he has given up his delusions about Ron Paul).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Yes, Kucinich would definitely get a role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
58. No to Clinton as Majority Leader
That should remain Reid or it should be Chris Dodd. She has not been in the Senate long enough and it shouldn't be given to her just as some sort of consolation prize.

And I see Daschle getting a spot somewhere in the Cabinet, not sure exactly which spot though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Yes for sure he would get a role. Where about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. I think Daschle might get Chief of Staff - few people realize how valuable he's been to Obama
Daschle, Durbin and Kerry have been behind Obama for far lomger than most are aware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Again, Daschle is not Chief of Staff, he's an advisor...
The Chief of Staff position is a delicate balancing act, the Big Names like Daschle or Axelrod wouldn't do a very good job in the bottom of a trench with a shovel. (and, who was Daschle's chief? - Pete Rouse.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Yes, Rouse saved Obama from a couple of freshman mistakes, plus, as you said,
he is his current guy and low profile to the public. He would do well there for Obama. It should be Rouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #71
80. We'll see - it's still a highly valued position and very influential.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #58
74. I think it should be either Dodd or Russ Feingold...
One of the only reasons I don't put in Russ Feingold as my recommendations for VP is that I REALLY want to see Feingold in leading our
Senate. I think he was thinking that too when congress won back the Senate and the very next day he announced that he was going to stay and fight hard in the Senate rather than run for president. Dodd would be a good choice too, but Feingold would be my first choice. I do think we need one of these two to lead us away from the Blue Dog Democrats that have been blockage for us on many issues such as stopping the war, investigating this administration, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #74
86. Feingold leading the senate would be Excellent!
I like that a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. We don't need Military Clark as a VP
should be Richardson or someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. I thought about Richardson and he was in my top 5 and still is
but I think the "judas" remark by traitor basically set him up to be hated by Hillary's people. It would be the source of hate for the Hillary supporters. We need a unity ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. If Clark 'signs up' for the ticket in the VP slot I think he'd be
a great adjunct. I have no qualms about 'loyalty' and 'agenda' - if he says he's on the team, he's on the team.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. I think either Richardson or Edwards for me...
Reaching too much to a very combative opposition that is being more selfish in their aims rather than championing a cause (and I believe Hillary is in it for Hillary) can have a lot of costs. I think there's a real danger if you put someone that the Hillary people (who don't like Obama otherwise) would like far more as VP. You basically set up Obama with a bullseye on his back ala JFK in the 60's (and perhaps even a more extreme case of that than even JFK was). He should pick someone that his constituency would also be comfortable in running the country should he be forced out by any extreme means, and not someone that gives others an incentive to try and find ways to forcefully take out Obama. Hillary's gone too far for that.

And in fact, I think making her Senate Majority Leader really isn't going to help us in the Senate much. Would MUCH rather have Russ Feingold or Chris Dodd in that position if we don't put in Russ Feingold in as VP (and that's one reason I haven't suggested him).

I think for Hillary, I'd fully get behind her going for the governorship of New York, especially now with the acting Governor of New York also being hospitalized with more health conditions too.

And if RFK, Junior doesn't want to look to the New York or Massachusetts senate seats that might open up soon (I'm HOPING the latter doesn't!), then put him in as the Secretary of the Interior. I think he'd be great for that position, and we'd get a new Kennedy going in politics which we really need right now, especially one of his stature.

As for Supreme Court nominee, my first choice would be Erwin Chemerinsky. I think he is recognized as one of the best constitutional scholars out there today, and definitely has the right perspective on it from our point of view. I think he'd be one to help really reverse the trend of the corporatist judges that are in place now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. I think Hillary has to be offered something.
I thought about NY Governor for her, but figured she would rather have a national role, but being governor of NY is a national role in some respects. She would head up one of the largest states and economies in the world. She would get her exec cred up that way, too and rehabilitate her image.

Like I said, I would prefer Dodd, Boxer, Biden as Senate Majority Leader, but figured Hillary needed a big role to placate her.

RFK could be appointed to fill her spot in the senate. Wouldn't that be awesome? Put RFK in Hillary's senate seat for NY and have Patrick Kennedy move to Mass and fill Ted's seat when he leaves. Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. If Hillary were very prominent and lead on a certain area of issues, then I'd oblige...

But for me, her big problem is that her career has all been about power, and associating with other power brokers, exactly the kind of mentality we need to find ways of minimizing/pushing out of Washington now.

If she in the coming week or two before she winds down her campaign (at least I hope she does) tries to emphasize ONE issue she's staying to help with, then I'd be inclined to reward that issue with a related cabinet position. But she isn't and even if she did at this point, I think many would correctly see it more as political opportunism rather than someone who truly believes in a certain area of need.

Edwards has done this properly as you note as either a poverty czar, or in my book as Attorney General, which he seems well suited for with the issues he's emphasized in this campaign. For Hillary to have a national cabinet position, I think that's what I'd want to see from her. Much like I would have liked to see Dianne Feinstein get out of the Senate and run for our governship here in California where she could do less national damage, I feel the same way about Hillary at this point. Governorship for both of these two would go a long way to helping them either build back up their credibility for other political positions in the future, or to retire with a good legacy to leave behind. But at this point, I think nationally these two politicians (and others too in the Senate like Mark Prior, etc.) are the kinds that we need to find creative ways of moving them away from national political power as we transition to things like public campaign financing instead of the institutionalized corporate bribery that we have in place right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
78. Kathleen Sebelius as VP and Samantha Power as
UN Ambassador and I'll be fine with the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
82. head of the EPA - Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. . . . IF he isn't Vice President, that it . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
83. Secretary of Agriculture - Jim Hightower . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
85. Clinton heading the Senate? Poor Senators! I don't think a lot of them
Edited on Thu May-22-08 04:18 AM by FrenchieCat
would be too pleased. Quite a few Senators have endorsed Barack......quite a few....meaning, many don't care for her that much.

I think that's one lousy idea.

Sorry.

The rest are OK.

What about Homeland Security? I'd put Richard Clarke in charge of that.

Put Kathleen Sebelius As Veep. Governor of Kansas who was born and lived in Ohio for 26 of her years. Her Father was Governor of Ohio in the mid-early 70s. That should bring in the seniors to the ticket in Ohio. They are all catholics.

and put Wes Clark as National Security Advisor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC