Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wag the Election: GE/MSNBC Crowned John McCain on the Night of the Iowa Caucuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:45 PM
Original message
Wag the Election: GE/MSNBC Crowned John McCain on the Night of the Iowa Caucuses
I. BUCHANAN: I can’t tell you what I am going to do. Because MSNBC doesn’t allow us to endorse as you know, David. From MSNBC Super Tuesday Preview Coverage February 4, 2008

Pardon me while I crawl around on the floor and search for my ass, which I just laughed off.

There, that is better. What Pat Buchanan meant to say is MSNBC doesn’t allow us to endorse any candidates except Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama. As I will show later, the pundits at the GE owned 24 hours news network have been stumping for these two guys since the night of the Iowa caucuses (and McCain did not even win in Iowa). Buchanan can not stand McCain who is soft on immigration and hard on foreign intervention, so he has been about as happy as a hemophiliac at a knife throwers convention.

Now, exactly why would General Electric want McCain to be the Republican nominee? That is easy. The old retired military men that now work for the nation’s defense industry just love the man who spent Viet Nam in a box for his country. General Electric is a military contractor, too. Also, unlike other Republicans, John McCain of Arizona believes in immigration reform of the type that pleases big manufacturers like GE---keep ‘em here, working for those low, low wages that keep U.S. business profits sky high! By now everyone has noticed that while CNN and Lou Dobbs do specials about immigration, MSNBC does specials about prisoners and pedophiles. That is because GE does not want Americans to think that immigrants are scary. I don’t want Americans to think that immigrants are scary, either. But General Electric’s motives are different than mine. Finally, and perhaps most important of all, GE makes over $10 billion a year from selling nuclear reactors to other countries. It desperately wants to start building them again in the U.S. There have been no new nukes started since around the time of Chernobyl. Under John McCain that would likely change. He and bunch of military types believe that nuclear energy is the key to U.S. freedom from oil dependence. The last time I checked, there were over a dozen pending applications for new nuclear plant start ups on file at the NRC. The oil dominated Bush administration may be ambivalent. The “I don’t mind if we stockpile nuclear waste for one hundred thousand years and I hope you don’t mind either” John McCain administration is prepared to rubber stamp those proposals.

Why would General Electric want Barrack Obama to be the Republican nominee? Depends upon whom you ask at MSNBC. They all have different reasons. For the corporate bosses, if a Democrat has to win, he is better than the alternatives, Clinton and Edwards. Edwards just said no to nuclear energy during the debates. Clinton was agnostic . She wants solutions to spent fuel storage and safety issues. In other words, she wants fusion. Obama said that he supports the use of nuclear energy as a way to cut greenhouse gas emissions, i.e. he belongs to the “nukes are green “ school that proponents of nuclear energy espouse. His voting and donor history also suggest strongly that he is more open minded on the subject than his Democratic opponents, making him a better risk, just in case this really is going to be a Democratic year.

However, from what I read in the transcripts at MSNBC, GE intends to install John McCain in the White House.

II. MATTHEWS: I know that, but there are so many big state Republican parties not to be heard from yet who will want to choose McCain over Huckabee Night of the Iowa Caucuses , Huckabee has just won.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22505399/

The very first contest of the 2008 presidential season and the folks from GE can not wait to proclaim McCain the winner of the Republican primary even though Huckabee just won the Iowa caucuses. We hear a detailed discussion about how Huckabee’s win shuts out Thompson, Romney and leaves only McCain as a viable candidate (Gulianni is declared toast). Note that Huckabee’s win does not make Huckabee a viable candidate . Matthews starts off the festivities with Huckabee bashing, making fun of his foreign policy gaffes, etc. Tweety is one of the GE conspirators in the know.

This would not be so sinister, except that anyone with an ounce of sense recognized that the Republicans had only two candidates in their crowded field who had a snow ball’s chance in hell of surviving the general election. Only one of them was supposed to have a chance of surviving the Republican Primary, too. That was Rudi Giuliani. Unfortunately, the most powerful woman of the 2008 presidential election season took him out. No, I am not talking about Hillary Clinton or Donna Brazile. I am referring to Judith Regan. As soon as the other media giants discovered that Rudi planned to make his FCC favor News Corp above all the others, they went to work undermining the former mayor’s chances. They made him unelectable.

With the Mayor of 9/11 out of the picture, Democrats appeared to be in good shape. The only other Republican who could put up a fight in the general election was John McCain----and conservatives hated him because of his immigration stance. Evangelicals hated him because he was not god fearing. Bush was mad at him, because they had been opponents. He was too broke to run ads. How could he ever get nominated?

Having a major news network in his pocket sure helped.

BROKAW: This is good news for John McCain in New Hampshire, who can now go head-to-head against Mitt Romney and call him damaged goods.
Snip
BROKAW: It seems to me, Chris, that if you’re handicapping all of this, this is very good news for John McCain, because it put a big hole in the expectations and hopes of Mitt Romney in Iowa. And now we’ve got just five days to go in New Hampshire. That’s where the race starts fresh tomorrow morning.


You are getting this, right? John McCain won Iowa We only thought that Huckabee won, because we are too dumb to understand the real significance of the vote. “The Maverick” had the nomination sewn up way back in early January.

Tom Brokaw is always in the know. Indeed, when you see Tom Brokaw appear on the set at MSNBC, it usually means that the corporate masters at GE have some special propaganda they need to send out to America. Don’t forget that Tom Brokaw lead the charge to war against Iraq.

On to New Hampshire.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22574559/

Tom Ridge is invited onto the show in order to praise John McCain, as in “the Mac is back!” Note, McCain still has not won anything yet and is still broke and most conservatives still despise him.

RIDGE: Keith, I think that‘s a good question. I dare say one of the reasons that I‘m so loyal and so many of us are and believe in John is that rarely has he said one thing and then another day said it in a different way or said another thing. I mean, one of the things about our friend John McCain is he‘s a traditional, consistent conservative. He‘s been known to break with his party from time to time, but he‘s never been known to break his word. What he says he believes in.
And on top of that, I think one of the most appealing qualities that people are beginning to understand, it‘s not just his courage and his candor, but that Oklahoma meeting among Republicans and Democrats the other day, where they talked about someone reaching across the aisle, we need bipartisan politics. John‘s got a proven record in that regard.


We get to hear Matthews call McCain a maverick. Tucker Carlson calls him an elder statesman . The cast talks about all the dirty tricks Romney has pulled.

MATTHEWS: Well, the wild thing about McCain is, although he‘s a great military man who has served this country and that is obviously a patriot in all the great ways you can be a patriot, both in public service and in his military career, in his sacrifice, he‘s not popular among the regular Republicans, the people that go to meetings and organize the Republican Party victories.
MATTHEWS: Who does that leave? It leaves the media, and it leaves people who like mavericks.
I think, in New Hampshire, there are a lot of Republicans who like mavericks. They like Pat Buchanan. They like going against the grain. His challenge will be to go against the grain nationally if he wins tonight. That‘s a hard one. It‘s always going to be hard to be a successful maverick.


They key word there is “maverick.” Note that the polls in New Hampshire are still open at this point and will not close for almost another hour. MSNBC often pulls stunts like this. Staging “election night coverage” designed to fuck with the vote while people are voting is one of their specialties. Whether it is a bogus primary day poll about Obama being 20 points ahead in California
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/140

or Nora O’Donnell suggesting that Republicans cross over to mess with the Democratic Wisconsin primary to bring about a “Convention in Chaos”
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/149

GE has come up with a whole new class of Nixonian Dirty Tricks. Maybe because Pat Buchanan, the author of Nixon’s dirty tricks works there.

When MSNBC finally calls the New Hampshire race for McCain, the cast could not be happier. Kelly O’Donnell is ecstatic. They talk about how this is a new start. McCain will win because he is the national security candidate. Only Olbermann remains unconvinced, citing exit polls that show that even Republicans are concerned about the economy, not McCain’s strong suit. Brokaw steps back in—with some help from David Gregory.

BROKAW: John McCain‘s victory last summer, as much as I‘ve admired John for his personal courage, I thought his campaign was over. Here he wins New Hampshire and goes on from here.
Snip
DAVID GREGORY, NBC NEWS: Keith, yes, it‘s an amazing part of this story, but I want to talk a little bit about John McCain.
I‘ve been talking to some top Republicans who say, undisputedly now, he has got a clear path, in their estimation, to the nomination. They call him a front-runner at this point and they point to the margin between McCain and Romney.


Who are these “top Republicans” that you hear people like Gregory and later Fineman refer to? The CEOs of General Electric? Retired military men? Karl Rove? Officials at the RNC? Boy, I would love to know.

Keith Olbermann criticizes McCain’s speech and Matthews jumps in to defend him.

MATTHEWS: And McCain does that over and over again, guys. Over and over again this guy has a hard time. He has a hard time with his own party. He has a hard time in losing in South Carolina after his family was in many ways ridiculed and I think abused in that campaign primary in South Carolina in 2000. And he came back and he came back and tried to make friends with the cultural right. He tried to make friends with the president. He tried to win. He lost the campaign fight in many ways several months ago and he kept coming back. And he found a new strength, at his age, as well as taking those barbs for being old. And he took it and he keeps going.
And I think that‘s a special kind of courage, guys. And he made one mistake. He used a prepared speech tonight. But we can - can‘t we all put that in perspective? Obviously he read the speech, thought it was pretty good and decided to read it. That was a mistake.


Ah, if only he was so tolerant of Democrats.

Next we move on to South Carolina’s Republican Primary

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22786061/

Recall that last time, after one win in New Hampshire, highly placed Republicans who were not named had been quoted as saying that John McCain was the “front-runner” with a clear path to the nomination. Keeping this in mind, we will do what MSNBC did and completely ignore the fact that there was a Republican caucus that day in Nevada that Mitt Romney won. Because hell, Nevada is right next to Utah, and there are just too damn many Mormons out there.

When South Carolina is called for John McCain, Matthews again predicts victory for McCain---citing an unlikely source.

MATTHEWS: Well, he has to finish off Romney and then take on Giuliani. I was just looking at the international betting odds and how they have moved. It’s done in Ireland, of course. There is no sports betting for politics in Vegas anymore. It’s interesting that McCain is now better than 50/50 odd to win the presidential nomination of the Republican Party and Romney is 1 in 4. Hillary is 1 to 2 shot right now. She is an overwhelming favorite.


Finally, Florida and a contest with Rudi, whom all the networks except Fox now hate with a passion. If McCain can beat him, then he really is the man.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22919148/

TOM BROKAW, NBC NEWS ANCHOR: We’ve been talking repeatedly here and on other nights about how John McCain has demonstrated what a tough warrior he is. He’s not the perfect conservative in the eyes of a lot of people, but they find him authentic.


Poor old Pat Buchanan. General Electric won’t let him endorse anyone, but they trot out Tom Brokaw to call John McCain (the candidate who picks his opinions based upon which way the wind is blowing) “authentic” and a “maverick”. I think that MSNBC is one of the circles of Hell that Dante forgot to write about and Pat "the Lord of Lies" Buchanan is being forced to serve out his sentence for aiding Nixon by working for GE.

Tonight is Giuliani bashing night. Fineman comes on and says if McCain wins by even a vote he will be rolling in money according to his Republican friends in California. Are these the same high ranking Republicans that Gregory was talking to? Lots of defense contractors are Republican. Lots of them live on the west coast. Who is giving money to John McCain right now? General Electric is like the world’s second largest employer. It could probably bankroll a presidential candidate just through its own employee’s contributions.

MATTHEWS: There’s one problem. And that’s the Republican Party. And they reject John McCain like tissue rejection of a foreign object. They don’t like him. He’s a maverick. It’s not just evangelicals. It’s the people who work in the trenches, campaign after campaign. They don’t like mavericks. The media likes mavericks. Democrats like mavericks. Republicans aren’t mavericks. John McCain is a maverick.


You hear that, Republicans? Tweety just called you a bunch of sissies who are too scared to vote for a real man like McCain. What are you going to do about it?

Joe Scarborough, who claims not to like McCain even calls him a “maverick” three times.

When John McCain is declared the winner of Florida and news arrives that Giuliani is going to endorse him, everyone celebrates.

GREGORY: But, as one top Republican said to me earlier today, you are seeing a consolidation behind John McCain, on not national security, on a kind of authenticity.


Who the hell is this “top Republican”?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23011406/

Super Tuesday Preview Coverage

Nora O’Donnell is outraged. She does not "endorse" John McCain. She just adores him.

N. O’DONNELL: Rachel Maddow, I have to talk to you about what is this war going on in the Republican Party where essentially a number of the talk show radio hosts on—are essentially trying to run this viral campaign if you will to get McCain out of this race saying he is not a true conservative.


This is the episode where Pat Buchanan will reveal that MSNBC does not allow its pundits to endorse candidates. Such sweet irony.

This takes me up to the journal I wrote months ago about MSNBC’s atrocious Monster Super Tuesday Election Night coverage:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/140

In which I noted that everyone was calling McCain a “maverick” in much the same way that the president’s cabinet in Idiocracy say’s “Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.”. Were they getting bonuses for saying it? And late in the evening this is how I described Tom Brokaw’s little chat:

Eventually, Tom Brokaw comes on to offer the Republican Party some sage advice. They must not go to their convention without a designated nominee. This will be a terrible thing for their party (and presumably for the country). They must nominate McCain and make the country love him. Brokaw reminds Republicans of 1968 and what happened when Humphrey was the default nominee at the Chicago convention. He warns Republicans that McCain could be their Humphrey that helps them elect a Democratic Nixon (either Hillary or Obama) if they do not rally around him now. Everybody listens quietly while he speaks. This is what “fair and balanced” journalism is all about.



More to come about MSNBC's scripted election night propaganda in my next journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never a truer expose' has been written here in D.U.!
If I did not know better, I'd accuse you of using a crystal ball.

However, the whole thing was painfully obvious to me as well ... from the beginning... and I didn't even crack out the tarot deck.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. kicky wicky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dont think it is a complete MSNBC thing
I think Matthews, Abrams, and KO will all be Obama supporters, though you wont know it from Tweety's coverage. And that is there entire 7-10 lineup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I lost you...
at the point where you said Giuliani had a snowball's chance in hell at surviving the general election. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Terminally wrong
Edited on Thu May-22-08 08:45 PM by anigbrowl
Guiliani was frozen out by MSNBC...even though he pursued a strategy of not bothering with the early contests and planning to make landfall in Florida, while saying 9/11 a lot. Nobody but the evangelicals liked Huckabee. Conservatives loved Fred Thompson but he seemed to lack interest in actually expending any effort to get anywhere. None of the conservatives were behind Romney (too much of a Robot, too wealthy) until it becomes obvious that McCain is going to win and they stage a last desperate rally around him. Immigration-bashers complained that none of the candidates reflect their views but none of them actually sent money or votes for Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter.

You should try monitoring some Republican or mixed forums in your spare time. McCain won because everyone knew who he was and it brought him votes from independents in open primaries. The rest of the GOP were too busy infighting to settle on a candidate. Your conspiracy theory is largely bunk. Conservatives mainly watch Fox, not MSNBC, and if any of the GOP candidates had properly defined themselves early on they'd have had a support base to present a serious challenge to McCain. Instead most of their base spent last winter making fun of the Democratic candidates and dissing each others' picks.

All through last year they were expecting to be campaigning against Hillary Clinton; until recently they believed that the Clintons had mythical political powers and that the Dem race would really be a beauty contest to see who would be her VP. When I told my conservative friends last August that I was in or Obama they hooted with laughter. They had spent the last 8 years working up their attacks on Hillary Clinton and assumed that they'd be able to repeat the Bush/Rove election calculus. The hard core bush voters assumed before the primaries started that it was going to be Rudy v. Hillary.

But then Huckabee upset the apple cart in Iowa. Mitt Romney suddenly looked like a tool because everyone knew he was spending a lot of his own money and had seen he wasn't much good at retail politics, and Rudy Guiliani was too into himself to go anywhere that might involve getting dirt on his shoes, so he just bounced up and down the east coast prattling about 9/11 and riding a segway (his Dukakis moment...I spread that picture far and wide, sending it to every Republican I knew). He had to be practically dragged to New Hampshire and was plainly uncomfortable there.

Rudy's failure had nothing to do with MSNBC or GE; he just had no clue how to campaign outside New York. The conservatives were devastated when his campaign imploded in Florida, but they'd already fatally wounded both Huckabee and Romney in the belief that they were clearing the stage for Rudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC