Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Comment was tasteless to the point of disqualification.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:48 PM
Original message
The Comment was tasteless to the point of disqualification.
Even if her motives were pure as the driven snow, she simply should have had better tact than to make an assassination reference. Any point she was trying to make has been drowned out, rightly or not, and she should have *known* this before she opened her mouth.

Bye Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agree. She is not now acceptable as a candidate for the office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even if you give her the benefit of the doubt, it shows poor judgment
We do not need poor judgment representing us in government.

Oh, and I don't give her the benefit of the doubt. She's a lawyer, for crying out loud. Attorneys choose words carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It should especially disqualify her as the default candidate if something did happen to our nominee
I don't understand why she assumes Obama's delegates would go to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC