|
Edited on Sat Aug-14-04 04:42 AM by BillyBunter
He could get up there and advocate an invasion of Canada, and those people would applaud him for it.
That being said, people here are underestimating him, looking at their own wishful-thinking projections and calculations, and setting themselves up for finger pointing should things go bad. You can see it in the whiny tone of some of these posts, "Why doesnt Kerry do this?" and so on.
Fact: No incumbent president in history has lost with an economy performing like this one. Sure, this economy is nothing like it was during most of the Clinton years, but it's good enough so that, based on economic data alone, Bush would win an election ceteris paribus.
Fact: Bush is not a good speaker, and he's obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed, either. But he isn't a total moron, and he has a huge organization of people devoted to covering for his many weaknesses. Yet people here insist on acting as if he's a pushover, all Kerry has to do is this (insert asinine suggestion), and everyone can go home -- election over. Sorry, not that easy. Despite what people here say, Gore was a seasoned politician and a smart man, working with a strong economic wind at his back, but the Bush organization was able to fight him to a virtual standstill. Bush, with the massive resources he has behind him, is not a pushover, people. The sooner you get that through your heads, the better.
This is going to be a tough fight -- I hope. I hope to God -- you have no idea how much -- that Kerry pulls it out, but he has to be considered the underdog at this point. All this stupid infighting, these smirking comments about whom Kerry will pick for what cabinet post "when he wins" are a waste of time. We need to be focusing on getting Kerry and as many Democrats into office as possible -- period; enrgy spent on anything else, including childish whines because the campaign isn't being run exactly the way you think it should be, are a waste of time and energy, and help Bush in the end.
|