Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem Strategy and Strategists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:08 AM
Original message
Dem Strategy and Strategists
Edited on Sat Aug-14-04 09:55 AM by Dover
Kerry’s Consigliere

For the legendary strategist Bob Shrum, a lifetime in Democratic politics comes down to John Kerry and a final shot at the White House.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200405/lizza


Powerlines - reclaiming Patriotism

...But Kerry’s speech was just as striking for what it did not do, or even attempt. He offered no overarching vision of what he’d seek to do as president. In part, that’s a reflection on Kerry, who’s led discreet and commendable battles in his years as a legislator — against arctic drilling and exposing Iran-Contra — but never identified himself with a cause or ideology in the manner of, say, his Massachusetts colleague Ted Kennedy. In part, that’s a reflection on Kerry’s consigliere, Robert Shrum, a veteran campaign consultant whose candidates haven’t often had a single unifying theme to their message.

Then again, the domestic platforms of virtually every Democratic presidential candidate this year were very similar, with the exceptions of Joe Lieberman on the right and Dennis Kucinich on the left. All, including Lieberman and Kucinich, proposed, as their top-dollar item, greatly expanding health insurance, and Kerry did make clear that this was his foremost domestic priority. (Also like the other candidates, he vowed to pay for this program by rolling back tax cuts on Americans making more than $200,000 a year.) His program is actually crafted to avoid the kinds of political attack that crippled both Clinton’s program and any suggestion of single-payer, through the miracle of not really creating any new program. Instead, he has the government assume the cost of catastrophic illnesses that employers and employees now cover in the form of higher premiums and deductibles and co-pays. He expands Medicaid to benefit more poor people, and he authorizes the government to bargain with drug companies to bring down costs. No great vision there, but it would go a long way to making health care more affordable for the already-insured and more attainable for the uninsured.
...cont'd

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/37/powerlines-meyerson.php


Kerry's captain in the war of words,
Shrum known for populist message


By Brian C. Mooney, Globe Staff | April 17, 2004

President George W. Bush's reelection campaign long ago assembled a media team of 10 firms to shape and promote his message. By contrast, with the abrupt departure early this month of Jim Margolis, Senator John F. Kerry's campaign now has a single ad-making firm.

The Kerry campaign says it may add creative talent, but at this point all the eggs are in one basket -- Shrum, Devine & Donilon. Margolis's exit means the influence of consultant Robert M. Shrum is only likely to increase at the headquarters of the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Acknowledged as one of the great wordsmiths of American politics, Shrum, 60, still writes with pad and pen in the laptop age. Many of the candidates for whom he has toiled have been charmed by his urbanity and intellect. Some campaign aides, however, have felt wounded or stepped on by him over the years.

Besides his reputation as a fierce inside player who requires primacy in campaign councils, the most frequent criticism of Shrum is that too many of his candidates run some version of the same populist campaign. They are always fighters, usually against powerful, impersonal forces that are holding down working people...cont'd

http://tinyurl.com/6n9q8

or

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/kerry/articles/2004/04/17/kerrys_captain_in_thewar_of_words/


Stategists Invite Clinton to Bolster Kerry

...Harold Ickes, the senior political strategist in the Kerry team, contacted Mr Clinton this month to discuss ways in which the former president's political skills can be used in the coming months.

It has been agreed that he will make a leading speech at the Democratic Convention in Boston at the end of July, despite the fears of some Democrats that Mr Clinton could upstage the presumptive nominee.

"There will be members of the Kerry staff and the advisory council who will say that Kerry may be overshadowed by Clinton speaking," said Mr Ickes. "But I think that at the convention, as much as Democrats love Bill Clinton, they are going to be very much focused on their nominee and they will give him a huge send off."

The former New York governor, Mario Cuomo, still an influential figure in Democrat politics, has also advised Mr Kerry to exploit the Clinton factor.

"Whatever you can do to use Bill and Hillary, big time, use them. The sun that makes your plants grow and makes everybody strong and gives life to the world is so big that when it shows up everybody tends to notice it. So what? What do you get from the sun? You get nourishment. You get life."

Sen Kerry's foreign policy team is staffed largely by luminaries from the Clinton administration, including Madeleine Albright, Samuel Berger, William Perry and Richard Holbrooke. The Clintons have also offered frequent advice on campaign strategy and tactics. It was at Mr Clinton's instigation that a "war room" was set up at the Kerry campaign headquarters, designed for rapid response to Republican attacks......cont'd

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/05/30/wkerry30.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/05/30/ixworld.html


Building a Political Echo..marketing the buzz

...That the Bush campaign is more methodical in adapting marketing concepts such as influentials to politics does not surprise Michael Harrison. He is the editor of Talkers magazine, which covers talk radio. "The Republicans have always been more organized and more visionary in taking advantage of new media," Harrison said. What is striking about this year's politics is the way in which e-mail and Web sites have entered the mainstream at both ends of the ideological spectrum, and help promote the buzz that any new product, whether car or candidate, needs to be successful. "Every housewife has an e-mail," he said. "We're not talking about geeks and technoheads."...cont'd

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19040-2004May11.html


Kerry Campaign Hires MoveOn.org Strategist

Posted April 8, 2004

John Kerry's campaign has hired Zach Exley, a top strategist at MoveOn.org, to run the presidential hopeful's Internet operations, according to a report in the New York Post. The Bush administration has accused MoveOn.org and other controversial "527" groups of spending supposedly outlawed "soft money" on attack ads against the president.

http://www.insightmag.com/news/2004/04/13/Politics/Kerry.Campaign.Hires.Moveon.org.Strategist-655619.shtml

Strategists want to tell Kerry's story

Kerry strategist Tad Devine discusses the presidential campaign.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-25-newsmakers-sunday_x.htm


Race Dogged by Terror Fight

August 2, 2004

BOWLING GREEN, Ohio, Aug. 1 - John Kerry was supposed to spend Sunday traveling through small-town Ohio and Michigan, going to church and talking at rallies. But by afternoon, his campaign was also searching northern Ohio for a secure telephone line so Mr. Kerry could squeeze in a briefing on an issue that was overtaking the day: the terrorist threat announced in Washington.

Three days after he accepted the Democratic presidential nomination, Mr. Kerry, along with President Bush, received a bracing reminder about how the fear of another terrorist attack on American soil had shaped the contest and about how the most pivotal thing that could happen between now and Election Day was beyond the control of either campaign....cont'd

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/02/politics/campaign/02campaign.html?ex=1092628800&en=a4589d5752f650e5&ei=5070&hp


White House Jumped Gun on Politically-Timed Terror Alert

....The FBI and local police still haven't determined whether the surveillance was performed by a single person or several people, and the FBI has not yet identified anyone involved in the surveillance, the White House official said Thursday, adding that the detailed reconnaissance indicated "an awful lot of time and energy put into it."

The surveillance records had been accessed for unknown purposes this spring, months later than authorities had previously disclosed, the official said. The government had said earlier that some files had been reviewed as recently as January.

But some within the Department of Homeland Security questioned the timing of the terror alerts, issued immediately after the Democratic National Convention closed in Boston and succesfully diverting attention from the official launch of Senator John Kerry's campaign for President.

"We had the information before the convention and we didn't announce it," one DHS agent grumbles. "We had the information during the convention and didn't announcement. Nothing changed but we dropped the alert bomb right after the convention. If I were a Democrat, I'd be suspicious."

Another administration official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, claims the White House still would have issued the terror alerts even if it had known at the time that the surveillance documents did not point to an imminent operation...cont'd

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_5024.shtml








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shrum has lost every time he has tried to play the game. Why
people keep using him is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not exactly.....
From the article, Kerry's captain in thewar of words
April 17, 2004



..Shrum's clients win much more often than they lose, but like other top-tier consultants, he's had high-profile campaigns that were stinkers. In 1992, presidential candidate Bob Kerrey publicly disowned his TV ads.

..snip..


Joe Trippi, who managed Dean's campaign, worked for Shrum in the mid-1980s and later on the 1988 Gephardt campaign. Trippi calls Shrum ''brilliant, with great instincts, but stubborn when he thinks he's right." Trippi is sympathetic when the subject comes up about Shrum's failure to help elect a president.

''If you start in 1972, there have been something like 58 Democrats who have run for president, and only two have won," Trippi said. ''It's not like we've been electing a hell of a lot of presidents from our party lately."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Conservative Media...
Edited on Sat Aug-14-04 10:03 AM by Dover

...To conservative media experts with whom Insight spoke, Kerry's reference to "networks that provide a single point of view" was a coded reference to Fox News. And they warn that Kerry's chilling comments are a threat to bring back the Fairness Doctrine and apply it not only to radio but to cable-TV programming. (The Kerry campaign refused response to Insight's queries on this issue as well.) Experienced conservative broadcasters say they know all too well that, because of the cost of compliance with demands by liberals for response time, the Fairness Doctrine as utilized by liberals in the sixties acted as a barrier to popular conservative programming, allowing the establishment liberal bias of the network media to dominate the airwaves. But conservatives aren't the only ones with this point of view. In his book, The Good Guys, the Bad Guys and the First Amendment, liberal former CBS News president Fred Friendly documented how the Democratic Party organized campaigns in the 1960s to harass conservative radio personalities with the Fairness Doctrine. He calls the doctrine a violation of the First Amendment.

Although some conservatives initially opposed the Reagan administration's repeal of the policy in 1987, thinking the liberal electronic media would shut out their voices even more effectively, cable TV and the newly freed markets of the airwaves responded to public demand with conservative commentators such as G. Gordon Liddy, Limbaugh and Hannity, providing a counterbalance to the establishment liberal media. When Democrats tried to bring back the Fairness Doctrine in the early years of the Clinton administration, the conservatives led their millions of listeners in a successful letter-writing campaign.

But now, because of a recent congressional rollback of proposed FCC regulations regarding media ownership, some liberals and Democrats feel emboldened, says political strategist Jeffrey Bell, a principal in the lobbying firm Capital City Partners. Even some conservatives, such as Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center, joined in the fight against the FCC's proposal to lift the ownership caps for broadcast networks. The FCC wanted to raise the percentage of the American audience a network could reach through the stations it owned from 35 percent to 45 percent. In a compromise, Congress fixed the cap at 39 percent as liberals clearly expressed their intention to stop conservative Fox News from getting more powerful. Kerry said in the interview with the Hollywood Reporter that he is "against the FCC decision" to allow expansion of markets. Many opponents of the FCC proposal to raise the cap to 45 percent are calling their successful attempt to stop it a "first step," with the next steps including restoration of the Fairness Doctrine to eliminate the conservative commentators. "I do think they lament the rise in conservative talk radio, and they want to get back to a time when, if somebody said something conservative on the air, you had to provide equal time, which made it impossible to have that kind of programming," Bell says.

Now, Bell adds, Kerry's words in the Hollywood Reporter, which make clear he "certainly does" want to bring back the Fairness Doctrine to drive conservatives off the air, may be just the thing to get Bush's base riled. "If people think that government reregulation is going to close down their options to listen to talk radio or cable, then I think they're not going to be very favorable to Mr. Kerry's point there," he says. "The Democrats' base is motivated. Things like this could make the Republican base just as motivated, if he's trying to take away people's ability to listen to the type of broadcast they want to."...cont'd

http://www.insightmag.com/news/2004/07/19/Politics/Kerry.Embodies.New.Left.Ideals-695871.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hi Dover
per DU copyright rules please no more than 4 paragraphs of copyright material with a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ll
Edited on Sat Aug-14-04 10:13 AM by Dover
,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. From FOX to NPR the media is being grossly unfair to Kerry.
It is getting worse all the time. And undermining what tenuous foundations our democracy has left. Bush and Cheney are constantly getting at minimum a pass, while Kerry is relentlessly put on the defensive. Just last night on Washington Week all the "journalists" agreed on what a masterful stroke Cheney's "sensitive" speech was. There was no explanation of how Cheney had taken Kerry's words totally out of context. Nor how both Bush and Cheney had used exactly the same word themselves. Only admiration of how "effective" this attack was.

I notice that "reporters" are now routinely quoting and characterizing Kerry's words, while Cheney and Bush are shown actually delivering their own words. Surely there must some insistence by the Dems that if you show Bush delivering his own words the same courtesy must be extended to Kerry. The Dems just have to wake up and smell the damn coffee!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "" ? Well put. I completely agree! And furthermore....
""" ...""".."......!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC