|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:02 PM Original message |
Can we all now agree that Harold Ickes is a disgrace to the party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. He was trying to make a mockery of the process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
66. The Hillary campaign believes in what it is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Oh Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's fighting the wrong fight, at the wrong time, with the wrong people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
68. How Is It That Ignored Is ALWAYS At The Top Of So Many Posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #68 |
75. What does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. He seemed fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I can't wait for your cookie (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Second that, I'm throwing a party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. I want to be part of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #29 |
64. YEP - I'm there.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
73. Me and you both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:50 AM Response to Reply #9 |
74. can you pm me when it happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Obama would never have fought to the ugly end like this if the math were reversed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Hillary's crew are a bunch of wrinkled old white men who are racists to boot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Your "crew" was a disgrace to the Democratic party...I was embarrassed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Maturity advice from a Clinton supporter. You lack credentials.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Name names, Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Clinton supporters don't obsess over Obama's folks???? Really??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. you still here? God, I will be glad when you get your pizza. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
51. I wouldn't have thought that the garbage he spewed was "fine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
62. Would you provide some evidence about how mature and restrained the Clinton supporters have been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
69. Uh.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. Can We Have A List of The Electeds Supporting Hillary Now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
30. HolyWarJoe's been backing McCain since November. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. No, Joe ran as an independent against Lamont. He lost his SD status then. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #33 |
60. That's not clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
72. Here's Wikipedia's list of superdelegates indicating whom they've endorsed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. His hypocrisy was too thick to even cut with a knife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. And there's the word I've been looking for: CORRUPT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. When is opposing the awarding of delegates to someone who was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Q: Since when are 'delegates' awarded? A: When they're not elected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. It appeasr there is now an anti-Democracy wing of the Democratic Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. It's called the DLC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. You can't honestly say it would be fair to give HRC the whole MI delegation, can you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. No.. not at all. I think they should have gone 73-55 with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Why would that make any difference? And why sweat four more Obama delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I guess that is exactly my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ekwhite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. The point is, she wanted 73-55 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. Oh, I see what you're saying. Well, probably she'll decide in the end that it's not worth it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. I actually agree with you on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's hard to buy his argument about honoring all the voters, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. hell, he wasn't concerned about any MI or FL voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. It was esp. sickening when the Chair had finally quieted the screamers, then Ickes deliberately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. You really don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. This wasn't an attack on ALL THINGS Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I'm not saying you are attacking anyone here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'll say, what an EMBARASSMENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
14. he's a fucking jerk with really bad hair! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. another guy that outlived his usefulness by 20 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. Is Harold Ickles Working On Any Other Campaigns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. Actually, he "reserved the right" to take to credentials committee. But his 'tude was.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaiilonfong (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. Ickes is a DINOSAUR and DLC HACK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FightingIrish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
27. Power is addictive and we saw a power junkie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
71. DING DING DING We have a winner!!! Exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
28. that was quite a performance he put in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. Disagree, he was representing his candidate as best he could, which was his right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #35 |
63. Why was the MI decision overkill? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. and so is Hi-liar-y |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
39. It's outrageous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
40. Agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. I think we can agree that he represents his candidate perfectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I agree with that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #41 |
58. Yes he did. The fake outrage, the self righteousness, the victim hood, the intellectual dishonesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
44. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
46. A disgraceful presentation with his obvious affirmative action and hijacked tags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
47. Not as big of a disgrace as Hillary is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
48. yes. I never liked him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
49. The day she drops is the day his paycheck stops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
50. He is worse than that. He's up their with Bush and his cronies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
53. Clearly, this proves that Ickes doesn't care if we win in November. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
56. Yes we can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
59. Yes, definitely. He's a jerk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
67. Agree 100%. K & R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
76. No, we can't agree on that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
77. YES, WE CAN!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
78. No.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
79. No, he's a loyal Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecdab (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
80. His time has come and gone - he disgraces himself and Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC