Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama picks Clinton for VP now, he makes himself look weak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:25 PM
Original message
If Obama picks Clinton for VP now, he makes himself look weak

It will appear that Hillary is calling the shots.


If he picks Clinton... then he ironically helps the argument that he is NOT the stronger candidate.



She has put him into a box where the ONLY way that he can look like a strong leader is to NOT pick her.


Picking her makes him look like a wuss. It emasculates him.



She gave him a lose-lose choice:

A. Don't pick her... look strong... but piss off her supporters
B. pick her... look weak... but placate her supporters.



He has to bite the bullet and go with "A". She gave him two bad choices, so he might as well pick the one that doesn't figuratively cut his nuts off.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. He would be doing business with a blackmailer. Who would
want a running mate that would do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. You read my mind. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Exactly right.
He can't cave in to extortion. He can't let her force her way onto the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Speaking personally, I say PISS AWAY.
Fuck her "supporters" if they aren't willing to get over her to vote for the best ticket in November. FUCK THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stagecoach Donating Member (468 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. The GOP would love it
They'd use that as a talking point. I can hear it now, "if he can be bullied by Hillary into selecting her as a VP, what's to stop leaders of terrorist nations from bullying him?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I saw Rove float that line today on Faux.
If Hillary wants to help the ticket I hope she doesn't try and strong arm herself, Lanny, Ickies, Bill, and the DLC onto the ticket. Plays right back into the 'weak' story line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Agreed, and I have been pushing it for a while
She blew it tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lets see what happens over the next two months.
A lot can change. No one will remember her speech at the end of July.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wrote him and told him that.
It would look wimpy, like she'd whine and he would cave. Not a good message of strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. He cannot afford a VP he can't trust.
It ALWAYS becomes a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You got it. JFK and LBJ is a prime example of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lmbradford Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agree
It would be a HUGE mistake....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wellif you go with the line of thinking that
The clintons believe that he needs HER to win, but that she doesn't want to be V.P., this would be the "best" strategy for going about that mission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. He would not simply LOOK weak, he actually would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. On come on now. Hell if obama wants to win in november he
will offer the vp to hrc. everyone talking about the clintons being finished. just stop and think for a moment. Hrc controls the fate of one Barach Hussein Obama.That my friends is power and since you all say the clintons have been about power, this is it.

Ben David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. By picking her, he would show weakness now. A November win, if it happened
would leave him as an emasculated President before he was sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. Hillary would be a backstabbing fifth columnist in Obama's campaign. Worst possible choice.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 12:27 AM by AdHocSolver
Obama needs "new" Democrats, independents, and moderate Republicans to vote for him more importantly than the votes of vindictive Hillary supporters.

If (shudder) Clinton were the VP candidate, Obama would lose more votes in the first group than he would gain from the second group.

Whether VP candidate or not, she has already indicated that she will work against Obama and for McCain, so that she can run against McCain in 2012.

She displays extreme foolishness since, whether McCain wins in 2008 or not (most likely not), McCain will NOT be the Republican candidate in 2012. The Republican candidate in 2012 will be more formidable than McCain, and the Democrats will need a much more competent candidate to win than Hillary has shown herself to be in the current campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. as somebody said on TV (she would be his Cheney)
He doesn't need another Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetblond Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Very Sad article by Andrew Sullivan
Very sad article by Andrew Sullivan

The speech tonight was a remarkable one for a candidate who has lost the nomination, though not remarkable for a Clinton. It was an assertion that she had won the nomination and a refusal to concede anything to her opponent. Classless, graceless, shameless, relentless. Pure Clinton.

Her narcissism requires that she deprive her opponent of a night, or a second, of gratification or attention. And she has now won, in her Bush-like version of reality, 18 million votes. Her invitation for her supporters to email their suggestions to her website is pure theater, a way of keeping herself in the spotlight and maneuvering her delegates to demand a second spot on the ticket. The way she is now doing this - by an implicit threat, backed by McCain, to claim that Obama is an illegitimate nominee if she does not get her way - is designed to humiliate the nominee sufficiently to wound him enough to lose the election.

Either way, she is clearly intent on getting Obama defeated this fall if she is not offered the vice-presidency. And if she gets the veep nod, the way she has gotten it will allow her to argue that a November loss was not her loss. It was his. And she will run again in 2012.

She will not go away. The Clintons will never go away. And they will do all they can to cripple any Democrat who tries to replace them. In the tent or out of it, it is always about them. And they are no longer rivals to Obama; they are threats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree with you Daemon. He's in a pickle thanks to HRC.
Let's see how he gets out of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. He needs to call her bluff - NO VP
He doesn't need her mind games on his ticket. He has the coattails and the donors; she's millions in debt from lack of support.

Sensible Dems will vote Dem and he'll get crossover. He needs to keep her influence out of his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. but if he did -
would you vote for him and her?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'd seriously have to think about it. Everything I've come to believe about him would be proved
false.


I think he'd lose more votes than he'd gain.


Nobody votes for a candidate that shows weakness. This move would show EXTREME weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. i think his supporters
on DU are living in a very sheltered world. There is a very narrow stripe of people that feel as yall do. The rest of the people in this country, don't feel that way at all. And I think they outnumber the Hillary "haters".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. It's not even so much Hillary..... He won't be able to govern with Bill there....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Alot of his supporters outside DU feel the same way. Stop and ask a few. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. some, of course
but not all.

And certainly not all of the undecideds.

If we (democrats all) continue to behave to badly and trash our own, then what do you think the independents will make of that? DO you think it will encourage them to vote DEM or Republican or not at all in disgust?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. He can't move quickly to pick her now even if he wanted her
For the reason you gave, at the very least he now would have to put her through all of the paces along with anyone else on his short list, and keep her waiting well into July. And the more she pushed the more she would propell herself lower on that short list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. her as veep is likely the only chance he has of possibly winning*
letting irrational childish hate ruin that chance would be a real shame




*(gore is the other alternative)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I disagree.... but even if you're right.... it cripples his ability to govern....
...

Which is the point of become President, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. nah, they can always 'banish' the veep when they need to
just let her pretend to fix the health care system like bill did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Nobody successfully "banishes" the Clintons..... and yes, I used the plural
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I disagree strongly
The only thing that would make the majority of republicans happily vote for McCain at this point would be coting against Hillary. Without her, he'll pick up a lot of crossover on charisma alone.

Plus everything everybody else has mentioned upthread: weakness, inability to trust, distraction, and that she is almost the antithesis of his core message (changing politics). He stands to lose more with her on the ticket than without.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. One of the abiding mysteries of this campaign
has been how many people take seriously the idea that Obama would even think of choosing Hillary as his running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muleboy303 Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hill as VP = Bill as Senator from NY
Hillary #2 seems to be the preoccupying question of the evening, especially as her campaign operatives asserted her being "open" to it this afternoon, and her evening speech contained "no decisions tonight".

Only one problem, well actually two. A winning ticket with Hillary as #2 would open up a U.S. Senate seat from New York, and having one Clinton as VP while another is in the Senate... well, let's just say that is a recipe for "DRAMA".
(and whointhehell wants more of that? ... besides the media, wall street, israel etc. and Harriett Christian)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. Trust me on this folks. Obama is no dummy
He holds all the cards. He knows having her around would be a disaster to his chances. He is being gracious and magnanimous in victory. No way he seriously considers her for VP.

I wouldn't be totally surprised if he picked another woman as VP -- one who isn't insane.

But I think the chances are greater that he will pick a white man with military creds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armani Toomer Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. Polls show Edwards is the better VP
Survey USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Earlier today I was thinking a cabinet position other than VP would be fine for her
But now I'm not so sure. Her speech tonight just seemed to contain too many thinly-veiled threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yes. You've got that right.
It would be all too obvious to everyone why he picked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. 100% right Kick & Rec. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
39. Have to Agree with That
she could've had it by playing differently, but that's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
41. I totally agree with your argument
wish I could have said it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexanDem Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
43. You are so right! If he picks her, placates her base but alienates his own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC