|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:29 PM Original message |
Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court Justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. I want a Supreme Court Justice who passed the bar the first time. Sorry, Hillary; it's not you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I want a Supreme Court Justice who spent time as a JUDGE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. yeah, I used to think she might be a good match because I hate seeing her in politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I want a SCJ that doesn't dodge imaginary sniper fire. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. With all due respect, a lot of law students don't pass the bar the first time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. But could that be leveraged into jobs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think so too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yuck. No politicians on the Supreme Court! JEEZ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. What would you call the 5 Bush Crime Family appointees who stole Florida? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. EXACTLY! This is why we need to further shield the SCOTUS from political winds! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
30. Earl Warren was Governor of California when Eisenhower chose him as Chief Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. no experience as a judge, obama as a con law prof. is more qualified than her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. this is not a dig against her....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. not qualified. what a ludicrous idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. No FREAKING Way. Her ethics are a disaster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. she is not even remotely qualified n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hello?, Integrity and judgement are required, few are qualified. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. Her speech tonight. Classless, graceless, shameless, relentless. Pure Clinton" Andrew Sullivan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. She isn't even qualified to be head dog catcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-03-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hillary Clinton is in no way qualified for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
19. Not if I could help it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
20. Well, that'd be one way to get TV cameras in the SCOTUS. She'd insist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. Frankly, I hope Obama picks a 35 year old who can sit there for the next 50 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
23. Impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
24. bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
25. She lacks the integrity integral to that position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
26. NO! I don't want her or her husband anywhere near Political Power again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:40 AM Response to Original message |
27. Bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
29. I agree. She would make a terrific Supreme Court Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
31. But if you make her a Supreme Court Justice, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Asgaya Dihi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
32. A passion for justice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
33. That's what I've been pushing. It's much more meaningful than VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC