Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court Justice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:29 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court Justice
I know some of you have heard of this before--in the cable media or something. But I think that Hillary Clinton would make a marvelous addition to the US Supreme Court! She clearly has the brains for it, and she has a passion for justice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want a Supreme Court Justice who passed the bar the first time. Sorry, Hillary; it's not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I want a Supreme Court Justice who spent time as a JUDGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yeah, I used to think she might be a good match because I hate seeing her in politics
but really she hasn't even been a lawyer for years, much less a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I want a SCJ that doesn't dodge imaginary sniper fire. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. With all due respect, a lot of law students don't pass the bar the first time.
And yet they go on to be fine attorneys.

Sorry, but I can't use that as any reason to not consider her for the SCOTUS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. But could that be leveraged into jobs...
...for Bill and her campaign staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think so too,
but don't you have to have been a judge at some point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yuck. No politicians on the Supreme Court! JEEZ!
I am astounded at the ignorance and naivety of people who suggest shit like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What would you call the 5 Bush Crime Family appointees who stole Florida?
Or the three of them that still remain and the 2 that Chimpy replaced them with, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. EXACTLY! This is why we need to further shield the SCOTUS from political winds!
Not merely ADD to it. Just because a politician of a Democrat's choosing would do Democratic bidding doesn't make it any better for the court itself that there are politicians sitting on that bench. That is antithetical to the very idea of separation of powers, checks and balances, and all that. Keep politicians out of the court. What we see now is a direct result of ignoring that wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. Earl Warren was Governor of California when Eisenhower chose him as Chief Justice.
Warren had no judicial experience whatsoever. Warren was a politician. And I think that worked out pretty well, don't you?

We've had politicians on the Court in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marimour Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. no experience as a judge, obama as a con law prof. is more qualified than her
It would be stupid to nominate someone with no judicial experience who hasn't even practiced law lately (in decades) to the supreme ct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marimour Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. this is not a dig against her.......
I'm sure she would actually be on the side of the issues that I would want her to be, but she has to interpret the law and thats something she probably hasn't done in years. Ask any lawyer or law student, it just doesn't make sense to nominate someone who doesn't even practice over competent and experienced judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. not qualified. what a ludicrous idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. No FREAKING Way. Her ethics are a disaster.
As a future juris doctorate, I can tell you that whether what happened wrt Whitewater was illegal or not, her role was surely unethical.

She would NEVER pass through the nomination process.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. she is not even remotely qualified n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hello?, Integrity and judgement are required, few are qualified. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Her speech tonight. Classless, graceless, shameless, relentless. Pure Clinton" Andrew Sullivan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. She isn't even qualified to be head dog catcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hillary Clinton is in no way qualified for that.
Personally, I'd like to see Obama, the constitutional expert, on the court after his 8 years as president. Used to be that one's political career wasn't essentially over after holding the presidency, and if nothing else I think it's an idea worthy of consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. Not if I could help it
We already have a court packed with sadly delusional people and sure as hell don't need another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well, that'd be one way to get TV cameras in the SCOTUS. She'd insist.
:evilgrin:

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. Frankly, I hope Obama picks a 35 year old who can sit there for the next 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Impossible.
She couldn't wear pantsuits as a justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. bad idea
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 05:14 AM by bowens43
I would like a Supreme Court justice who not only understands the Constitution but also respects it. That isn't hillary. She would be a nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. She lacks the integrity integral to that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
26. NO! I don't want her or her husband anywhere near Political Power again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
29. I agree. She would make a terrific Supreme Court Justice.
On the Court, she would be a reliable vote for legalized abortion, GLBT rights, individual rights. I'd love to hear her give and take with the likes of Scalia and Alito. She's relatively young...she could be on the Court for decades. She would be a moderate...dare I say...liberal voice on the Court. If Justice Stevens decided he wanted to step down from the Court after Obama is inaugurated, I can't think of a more worthy choice than Hillary. Plus, I think she would have a relatively easy confirmation by the Senate...she is one of their own, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
31. But if you make her a Supreme Court Justice,
then she doesn't go away. And go away is all I want her to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. A passion for justice?
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 06:05 AM by Asgaya Dihi
Given the fluid logic and arguments that it's wrong to disenfranchise two States, and only after she needed them, but it's at the same time fine to override the will of all 50 States through the Supers and the pledged delegates directly resulting from our votes can defect at will as well, I see the passion but not the justice.

A passion for justice? Not that I've seen. She's skilled and knows her way around DC so could certainly be useful somewhere, perhaps in health care reform, but I don't want her anywhere near a job she can't be fired from if she behaves badly and she hasn't shown the judgment or urge for fairness in this campaign which that job requires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
33. That's what I've been pushing. It's much more meaningful than VP.
No graft available though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC