|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:16 AM Original message |
Hilliary winning the popular vote is a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. Gosh, a dishonest clinton, what a surprise... /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. There is no popular vote count. Simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. Gosh, a dishonest Obamanoid, what a surprise. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. How can she claim a popular vote and discount the caucuses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I thought she was all about counting the votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. Then how, pray tell, is she counting the caucus states? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Deleted message |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
4. Why is it a lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Michigan should not count.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. LOL - I just kicked your ass in scrabble! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. If you don't count the caucuses it is a bold faced lie. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jespwrs (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. If you haven't gotten it by now, you ain't gonna get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Wow... the height of delusion. You realize that those vote 'he never got in Michigan' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heather MC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Don't forget the 30,000 write in votes the basically got tossed in the trash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCaliDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Oh those Michigan votes Hillary herself said "don't account for anything". Those votes she added... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gabeana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. How is this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
6. she ran a vile, dishonest, nasty campaign. Good riddance to her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
7. this is why she has zero credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
8. This isn't really unprecedented, Reagan won the popular vote in 1968 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. Lie or not, there is no fair way to count em for all 50 states, BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
14. according to Chuck Todd (don't blame me, just the messenger) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. Plus, she is not leading 18 million people by the nose..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jespwrs (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
18. Here's an example of the fallacy of this "popular vote" crap with regard to caucuses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Exactly, its totally made up BS. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Welcome to DU, jespwrs! Thanks for the excellent link. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jespwrs (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:24 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Your welcome, thanks for the welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
27. Her whole campaign is a lie. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jespwrs (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-04-08 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
29. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC