Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So please tell me why Obama is still painted as an 'elite'. If anyone imo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:17 AM
Original message
So please tell me why Obama is still painted as an 'elite'. If anyone imo
can and should be painted as elite, it's not Barack Obama. I keep hearing Tweety claim OBama has been poor and he's been privileged, but Obama has never been the in the middle-class. Even with proof to the contrary (read a book, Tweety), that's the talking point, and I don't get it. What am I missing? Look up Clinton and McCain in the encyclopedia, you might see 'elite', but Obama? Is Tweets delusional or does he listen to too much of his own hype?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was just watching the same thing and can not figure that one out....
What the hell determines and elitist anyway? Cause I see nothing about Barack that is not down to plain old earth. He would be a riot to have a beer with or anything else that one chooses to do in there spare time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think Tweety is confusing manners and graciousness with
elitism, because he hasn't seen much of either in HRC. But if that's true, Tweety has some brushing up to do himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
35. That's especially odd.
Compared with *, anyone should look elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Didn't you hear? Bill Clinton told voters in WV that Obama is an elitist who thinks he's
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 08:55 AM by Skwmom
better than them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And that's how something gets started. Too bad we have so few
independent thinkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. Yeah, The Rhodes scholar millionaire ex-president
called Obama an elitist. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I just posted this in another thread, I'll copy and paste
"Matthews is saying that Obama was poor, and then rich, while there was no in between (!), which people can't relate to. And him and Joe started going off on the Harvard thing, and Mika said "well, do you honestly think that he doesn't understand things like gas prices or people struggling with their bills, Chris? Isn't it a perception problem?" And Chris said "I haven't seen any evidence that he understands it" (!). Mika started to talk about the student loans thing, which Joe and Chris drowned out with "ohhh please, he made millions of dollars last year! " (Chris also got in the "exotic lifestyle" dig about his biography). And Mika said "I just don't think someone should be punished for having gone to a good school", but Chris and Joe shut that down too. The general election has definitely begun"

I guess Matthews is ready to focus on his true love McCain, since it's GE time (though, he kind of has been saying this stuff about Obama for awhile. I don't get it. Apparently, he is out of touch because he likes orange juice. The horrors!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Matthews is distinctly uninformed about almost everything but the historical and sports
analogies he spews ad nauseum. He can't let go of Tip O'Neill as his only claim to fame and he is threatened by people of superior education. He obviously hasn't read even a sketch of Obama's biography, much less bothered to pick up his books (Brokow said last night the books should be required reading and I agree). I'll never forget the night he sputtered when he found out Rachel Maddow was a PhD and Rhodes Scholar.

I don't think Matthews is a McCain fan.. I just think he's threatened by anything or anyone usurping his dominance over the conversation he THINKS America should have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. Be careful depending too much on Obama's books for life story
I caution everyone that significant parts of Obama's compelling life story are in sharp contrast to how his family and friends describe things in various articles. After reading and hearing the personal way he presents events, how he felt and what he thought, one can easily start believing they really know him. But all of this detail, this openness, the introspection leaves the impression that this must be how things are, but it distracts you from things he leaves out, or glosses over, or describes in a way that leaves others with an overly-favorable impression.

I listen to Obama with the same radar I use with Bush, Cheney, Bill Clinton, or any other politician. Obama is superb t at that in his speeches, less so in debates. But it is his body language, the slight hesitation, seeming to avoid making eye contact, his clothes and his manners -- these all send signals that contribute to others thinking of him as efite or elitist, if not elite.

The private schools Obama attended were certainly among the elite. The only "public" school he attended was in Indonesia after his stepfather move the family to an exclusive neighborhood, home to many government and business leaders. It is unclear how much scholarships paid of the private school attended by Obama and his sister and how much was paid by the family, including his grandmother. It is the most exclusive, the most elite school in Hawaii and is rated among the top ten in the US.

Degrees from Columbia and Harvard help define one as elite. Anyone else with his background would be considered elite by most anyone. That is also true for nearly anyone likely to be elected President. Most of the Dem candidates are highly educated, and the final choice was once again between grads of Harvard and Yale.
.
Obama grew up in a solidly senior professional middle-class, even upper-middle, family. Mother has PhD, grandmother a senior VP of a Bank, absent father with graduate degree from Harvard, several siblings with PhD. This is not what most people would consider an humble background, of coming up from almost nothing to where he is today. That story is mostly BS, and the RW are busy making sure that this alternate version becomes known.

BTW Professionals in the field who examined the Food Stamp story concluded it was probably part of a child nutrition program young children of single parents who were working or full-time students and was not financial-need based.

I have been warning for months this would become a huge problem for us with Obama as our nominee. We all know how effective the RW were against Gore and Kerry, and I fear that Obama provides much for them to exploit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That, in a nutshell, is Tweety. I don't understand this 'meme'
compared to the other candidate, or compared to anyone. Obama is the one who went to great schools but had to pay off his student loans, as did his wife. Maybe Tweety doesn't 'get' it because he's too elitist? He's no doubt annoying me with this though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Its time for us to hijack the media.... Its obvious what they are doing..
We need to mass e-mail them whenever they start spouting b.s. we know is not true.. How is Joe or Mathews relevant to middle America? Do you think they know what middle America needs or wants? I think the Obama's are a true American rags to riches.. the best of what America can be and could be and should offer for everyone.

Would we really want a President without a good sound education? Would we want a President who doesn't understand the economy again? How in touch is John McCain with his 8 mansions and his billionaire heiress wife? Do you think that John McCain knows the price of gas? When is the last time he could actually drive, old fart, let alone pump his gas? When is the last time he had to worry if he had enough money to pay the bills? When was the last time he had to worry about putting his children through college? Or being a college student graduating into an economy, that even with a higher education, will be going back to live with their parents and working at a restraunt, bar, hotel, or JC Penny because there are no jobs? John McCain is elitist... and the Obama's struggled... he wrote a book, which like Michelle said, was like winning the lottery for our family.

I'm sorry, the Obama's seem the closest thing to normal and down to earth if you are comparing them to middle America or John McCain.

Its time to take back our media.. Post on their blogs on the website, e-mail them and tell them we are on to them and its not going to work this time, call into right wing radio shows constantly to tell them that they are wrong with the assertions they are making... Call the bluff. We need to steal back our country.. the media are still trying to protect themselves. They are told their talking points. They push them off as real views of middle America when we know that Kucinich's views are really closer to middle America.

Election Reform, Un-biased media, and Progress are the 3 fundalmental things that we NEED and MUST work on to get our country back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. I wonder how much Tweets and Joe pull in?....
how much Tweets made on his books, and where each of them went to school? Bashing and trashing Obama, from these actors on these soap opera shows should be a surprise to no one. It is why they make the big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it is their way of saying
"we don't really trust an intellectual to toe the line of OUR elites, the corporate elites." The only way in which he is an elite is his top-notch education, which he seems to have valued a great deal. This in contrast to someone like Bush, who went to only the best schools and managed to emerge unscathed by enlightenment.

He scares them. It's all they've got, because he is dignified and refuses to stoop to their level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Its to blunt the historical achievement of Obama's victory
Empty rhetoric that reinforces his negatives within Hillary's base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. That makes a lot of sense, especially when I think of what came out
of Buchanan's mouth. He's also claimed Obama is an 'elitist' ad nauseum. Out of his mouth, I know he has other motives, and to blunt achievements of any kind makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawSchoolLiberal Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. The talking point isn't that he's an elite...
It's that he's "perceived" as an elite. It's a fine distinction. And it's something that the media is TOTALLY overblowing (present tense of "overblown"?) right now. Best example: Buchanan still screaming "What's his problem?!?" even after he's won the nomination.

That said, I do think he has some additional work to make sure middle class people feel like they know him. As does ANY candidate who makes it in to the GE. More people have participated in the primaries than ever before, but there are still a huge number of people who are only now (or maybe during the convention) going to start paying attention. Do I think he can win without "sitting in a bar" (to quote Tweety et al)? Sure. It's him or McSame! But will it be a far easier contest, perhaps even a landslide, if he does some work to let people (middle class, lower class, upper class, hell, kindergarten class) get to know him? Yes. So he should do that. Of course, that's not exactly "news," to him, us or anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. It just makes me wonder about all those thousands of 'elites' who've
attended his rallies. Why is the m$m so clueless when so many Americans aren't? I know, they're paid to forward that meme, perception, but it's annoying. And you're right, I'm sure Obama will get right on it now that he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Saw that.
The 'punditz' throw 'elite' around a lot. I think it's because they are intimidated. Obama's 'exotic'
to them because of his mixed race; places he's lived (Hawaii, etc.) and the success he's achieved in
his life. When someone says they want a candidate they could have a beer with, I suspect they are really saying: "I want a candidate that doesn't make me uncomfortable; who hasn't had more life
experiences than me".


At any rate, it irritates me to hear 'elitist' thrown around willy-nilly. Would love to make Timmeah and Buchanan, et al explain to me just exactly what 'elitist' means to them and then make them use it in a sentence where it actually applies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Good analysis. The thing is, Timmeah and Buchanan and Tweety
are the elitists, and you're right; maybe they haven't yet figured out how to define Obama. Too bad they feel a need to do so to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. These idiots just spit out the words Hillary puts in their mouth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Because all people with darker skin
have to be paired with "the elite" - otherwise, white men and women might actually vote their class interest.

Obama looks good in a suit because he is thin. He went to Columbia and Harvard Law and educated people flocked to him for his oratory and emphasis on ideas. My working class relatives were warming to him until the media and Hillary started the "elite" drumbeat. It's nonsense.

I'd place the blame squarely on HRC and the media.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. The one person that the republican base hates is the "elitist".
So you must be an elitist if you're not the Republican candidate. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. That doesn't explain the Clintons using the term, or
does it? :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. It does to me.
'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
40. I'm not sure I understand the Republican attacks against the elites
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 12:01 PM by Mike Daniels
Given who their current president is:

The eternal fuck-up born by fate into a rich/connected family who went to private schools and an Ivy League college. Furthermore, Bush owes his entire "success", as it were, completely due to his family name and connections as opposed to any real effort on his part.

If he had been George W. Harris vs "Bush" he wouldn't have made it past the first few rounds in the primaries much less become governor or president.

The best I can tell, his whole "ah shucks" image seems to be based entirely on the "ranch" which is so obviously a transparent attempt to be folksy I can't believe people fell for it.

In short, I don't know how much more elite you can get than George W. Bush when you factor is his upbringing and past but somehow he managed to convince enough people that he was "just one of the them" and be competitive enough in the election that the results could be tweaked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's racist. If he's black and he doesn't talk like Jimmy Walker, he's uppity.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 10:16 AM by TexasObserver
Elite is a code word for UPPITY, in this instance. To the white racist, the black man cannot win. He's either not enough WHITE, or too much WHITE. If he's accomplished, educated, then he enters the uppity zone aka ELITIST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Wow. I can't accept either term. But I get your point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I don't accept the terms, either but I'm using them exemplary.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 09:54 AM by TexasObserver
The problem is white people who are racist, and I was speaking shorthand.

For those people, blacks cannot win. If they speak in the manner common among many blacks, the whites ridicule them for not being sufficiently like whites. If blacks do aspire to a good job, a good house, a nice family, a well educated mind and voice, then the racist whites find such blacks "uppity."

Such whites will not say they're racist. They won't use Uppity, because they know it's unacceptable. So they contrive "elitist." He's suppose to be a snob. This is what is underlying the entire "he's an elitist" meme. It's white racists giving voice to their disdain for a black man who is smarter, better educated, and a more capable speaker than them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Thanks for the explanation, though it's just sad. I wish there wasn't
this mindset in anyone. People with that mindset probably have problems with anyone who isn't white or straight. I think the problem is their sense of entitlement. Who crowned them better than anyone else? Judging from their outlook, I could easily discriminate against them for their ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. basically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. He IS elite. He's classier and more intelligent.
And what's the matter with that? Don't we want that in a President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. Being elite has nothing to do with having money. Why do you think everyone tries to keep up...
with the Jones'? It doesn't matter whether the Jones' live just off Central Park, in the middle class, or in a Coleman tent cooking over a sterno can down by the river; the Jones' are perpetually they who have that elitist halo about them that others forever strive to attain.

Even in Hawaii where Obama was raised, Americans hoped they were viewed as elite by Hawaiians after having colonized & developed the island into one big Naval Base...now the elites are Asian real estate moguls & industrialists.

Last year, people that drove SUV's thought of themselves as elitist, these days they actually pull over and ask us what kind of mileage we get with our Ford Focus. We've had a Focus for nearly 10 years. We are on the crest of what will be elitist tomorrow, yay!

You can't just go to a dictionary and declare certain matters untenable when you *don't* see a picture of Barack Obama next to it. Elitism, as a subject, is a bit more fluid than that. If not elusive for many more. Like the pursuit of happiness.

The Obama's are elitist to many of us even here. What is the point of attaining an ivy league education unless you are to ascend, distinguish yourself from the rabble? You can still turn around and pat some on the head but there should be no illusion. The greater of which being that by being an elitist you're somehow wrong. Try it that way. Embrace elitism.

Cause The Obama's are elitist, and conduct themselves as such. Elitism is also a frame of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Elitism is defined by the context in which it's used.
It can refer to status but also to ability:

NOUN:
pl. elite or elites

1.
1. A group or class of persons or a member of such a group or class, enjoying superior intellectual, social, or economic status: "In addition to notions of social equality there was much emphasis on the role of elites and of heroes within them" (Times Literary Supplement).
2. The best or most skilled members of a group: the football team's elite.

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/elite

We really need to add a third meaning that describes how the word is used by the right wing to tar Democrats with "elitism" for being educated or valuing education. This usage is basically anti-intellectualism, pushed by Republicans because it's easier to manipulate uninformed people.

(Ironically, the derivation of the word "elite" is from the French, so using the word "elite" is, in itself, elitist and unAmerican by any Republican measure. lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. The true French Connection/California Wine, the RW is henceforth cut off...
republicans aren't playing to the human brain. They're playing to the fight or flight reptilian brain. Where all that are required is animal cunning, and the IQ of a light switch. They'll claim proximity to the common man/woman, while selling no-bid cronies SUV's & Hummer's at 15% over cost.

It's a sweet little gig, if you don't mind a head full of cavities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I still don't 'get' why Obama is painted as such while the Clintons and McCain
get free passes. Someone upthread mentioned it's interchangeable with 'uppity'. That word wouldn't be used for Clinton/McCain. Why is Obama the only one being branded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yeah, I think it's the 'uppity' thing playing out, what's good for their goose...
will never touch my gander yada-yada stuff. Theresa Heinz Kerry is an elitist, well, she doesn't drink in our saloon so there's that; and so is Cindy McCain...wait a minute...

Lots of ketchup & beer? That's all it takes? And you & me could be elitists!? :woohoo: :patriot:

Though I do hear you on the broad brush component. They did the same thing with B. Clinton. He made low 30K's as AR Governor. I am sure he'd have preferred they stop, if ever they passed it; at elitism. He just would have started up talking about crops, cattle & watermelons till they got tired & stopped themselves.

Sadly, it's not over for Barack. They have yet to begin plowing his row. We'll be sitting through some amazing shit before too long is my guess. The primary was merely a contentious mess. It's going to get real shitty from here to there x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. They are trying to paint him as thinking he is above them. I've been hearing
Hilbots using the words "arrogant" and "elite" like this for months. Again they are targeting their "hard-working white" base. Honestly they fit in better with McCain and his crew.

If Obama is elite, then I proudly stand with him as an elitist as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yes, that's what's happening. Or 'entitled', which makes me just laugh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. Gore and Kerry were charged with being elitist as well
so I don't buy that it has anything to do with him being black and "uppity".

The Repubs are definitely working off a different definition than one in the dictionary because by most standards the Bush's and Cheney's are pretty damn elite as well if you factor in upbringing, education and income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. Because millionaire pundits and TV personalities and Beltway political strategists say so
Does anyone see the irony here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. Based on where he came from he is an elite
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 11:48 AM by seasat
One of the definitions of elite from Marriam-Webster's dictionary is "the best of a class".

Barack Obama is an African-American man with a white mother that had a father abandon his family at an early age. His mother had to get food stamps at one point. They moved around the world. His mother then passed away while he was still young and he was raised by his grandparents.

Many folks raised in that kind of family situation usually end up turning to drugs or getting into trouble with the law. The odds of his family situation were against him. Yet he went on to earn scholarships to the top schools in the country. He became a successful community organizer. He became a successful lawyer. He earned a state senate seat. He earned a US senate seat. Now, he has earned the Democratic nomination for president. He overcame enormous odds to become what he is today. That is the definition of an elite, the best of a class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. The word 'accomplished' would seem to work better for me.
But thanks for your explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. I agree but one way to respond to this kind of attack is change the definition
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 01:19 PM by seasat
The attackers are trying to define it as someone above the common folk. Yet, the term elite has many definitions. If in a repeated talking point we refer to Obama as elite because he overcame enormous odds to achieve what he has today, then we can take away their talking points.

We can also make points that we need an elite person to lead this country. When we refer to members of the military called to go on a special mission, we refer to an elite squadron. Most folks would want an elite team of doctors to operate on them. We can remind folks of what happens when we don't choose the elite person, we get Bush or bottom of the class, John McCain. IMHO, using the definition of "best in class" changes the spin by Obama's critics. It's better than having Barack Obama do tequila shots with a group of good ole boys at the local bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's baloney, because he is no more or less elite than Clinton or McCain.

All three went to college.

All three have been senators.

All three have some money.

It is a distraction. And a very poor one. The fact that it works says more about the intellect of the average citizen than it does about the people who perpetuate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
42. In this country you are called an elitist if you speak properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
46. I was listening to that...
this is why he has to keep explaining who he is because the media has been defining him when they don't know what in the hell they are talking about..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. because most Americans are unable to think critically
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 12:52 PM by depakid
and as easy prey for propagandists and their memes- no matter how contradictory they may seem.

You really have to spend time abroad to see just how far off the irrational deep end Americans are with respect to what they'll believe.

Joe Bageant describes it as a God given right to hold their opinion, no matter how ridiculous, contrary to fact or self-destructive it may be.

So- Obama is the elitist, while the Admirals' son who slacked off at WestPoint and divorced to marry an heiress is the salt of the earth.

:crazy:

Almost any Australian would see right through that shit- and ridicule anyone who tried to pull that on them. Not so in the states, and therein lies the root of many of the nations' problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. Probably because of his grandiose speaking style.
It doesn't play well with the general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC