Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I finally realized one reason why this latest Hillary stunt is not sitting right with me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:31 PM
Original message
I finally realized one reason why this latest Hillary stunt is not sitting right with me.
It reminded me of Bush's claim to "having political capital and going to spend it". It seems as if her holding her voters/delegates hostage and not supporting Obama was very similar to that idiot's claim. It backfired when she found her capital was disappearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a mandate from the people.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Um, it didn't disappear. It's called the popular vote.
She had more ballots cast for her than he did. All he's got is the absurd delegate hoo-ha of this year. Which you know you wouldn't have if not for 1) Edwards and 2) your pathetic attempts to kill the votes in two states.

She was elected to the Senate twice, you know, and she was the only Democratic candidate other than him to stay afloat this long. That did happen. Her support did not come out of thin air.

Respect is a dead word here, though, so forget it if I expected you to know that.

I repeat: the runner-up candidate quite often does get the VP nod. That's how many others have done it.

Why on Earth wouldn't she at least hope to have a chance to be VP? It makes sense and you know it.

It's called building a coalition.

Then again, DU Obama people hate Clinton so much, they don't want the woman to continue breathing air, for pity's sake.

It's a party, not a cult. Try to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. While a nice story, it happens to be a lie.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:40 PM by SoonerPride
She didn't get more votes than he did, unless you live in a country with 46 states.

She lost.

Period.

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 18,107,710 48.1% 18,046,007 47.9% Obama +61,703 +0.2%
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. How long are you going to stand on your soapbox and pontificate?
You say you are in favor of more civility, but all you do is chastise and whine. Hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The popular vote meme is a lie.
Try to remember that.

Two threads I've reas so far and you make this false claim in both of them. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 18,107,710 48.1% 18,046,007 47.9% Obama +61,703 +0.2%
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:43 PM by SoonerPride
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

Yes, it is a lie.

We have more than 46 states.

She lost.

Anyone who says she got more votes is a disruptor looking for trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thanks. As an Obama supporter I am glad to have some ammunition
DOn't have many friends who support HIlary, but I need the facts tot tlak them out of their reverie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. That's correct (If you don't count MI and FL voters)...
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 08:21 PM by guruoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. What would the estimate for Tx be?
Nah, you probably don't see the relevance of the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Time for you to stop being a pain in the ass and move on.
And, get your facts straight. Hillary did not win the popular. Also, "the absurd delegate hoo-ha of this year," is what Hillary needed, and did not get, to win. Period.

We don't hate Hillary, we hate what she turned into during her camp pain.

You sound you have an over-abundance of hate, sour grapes or whatever you want to call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I'm taking bets on you getting tombstoned. STFU with your shit
I mean really. I am so sick of it. Hillary got more popular votes toward the end because OBAMA HAD ALREADY WON it was all over but the crying. So he focused on critically important states for not only primary but the general.

You crack me up. You just can't admit they ALL AGREED TO THE SAME DAMN RULES!!!

your ass is gone in a week based on your stupid tone.

you're the one drinking the koolaid and sacrificing yourself for your cult leader, HillBill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think you're got something there.
It struck me the same way; put me in mind of Bush saying he'd been given a "mandate" by those supporters who'd voted for him.

How truly sad, though. Hill had one last hand to play last night, and she chose to hold 'em when she should have folded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards is doing the same thing.
It is my understanding it is a show of presence at the Convention...just tradition and part of the ceremony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Edwards endorse Obama. So will Hillary, just not shen she should have.
And only after a major intervention, as if she was a coke addict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Edwards dropped out of the race and then endorsed Obama.
How is that the same thing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. The issue of discussion was suspending a campaign....
Edwards also suspended his campaign...Hillary has suspended her campaign.....this is the same process.

Edwards did not endorse Obama until 3 months after he suspended his campaign by the way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't see any mention of suspending campaigns in the OP or in the post I replied to...
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 12:55 PM by cui bono
but I did think that Edwards had dropped out. He suspended?

And I'm aware of when Edwards endorsed. I didn't understand how he could hold out for so long after so many statements he had made made it clear who he leaned towards, but the timing ended up working out rather well.

So it's not the same situation, as Edwards didn't give a stump speech the night his rival became the presumptive nominee, which is the "stunt" the OP mentioned and was the issue of the discussion.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's even worse than that...
She may have gotten almost 18 million votes, but that never meant that she has 18 million voters for the general election.

Most people automatically go with the nominee. That takes care of most of her 18 million votes right there. And she has no control over the voters anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think we'll soon be finding out why she waited that extra day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. In her speech last night, she actually said,
"...stay the course." I almost choked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. The street value of that 18mil is falling faster than an H2 driven off the lot.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 08:58 PM by cottonseed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC