|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:50 PM Original message |
Today, Randi Rhodes and her guest, Jonathan Turley, asserted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. complicity can be good men (and women) sitting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Got that right.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. indifference and tacit acceptance by the 'so-called' leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. oh god. On first read I thought that said RR and her guest arrested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
busymom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I read it that way too. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. No, That's About Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sperk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. complicit as in a cop watching a rapist rape over and over again..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Selling the Iraq War? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. They did not know. They knew what Bush had previously done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Oh brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. What to Clinton's people have to do with impeaching Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Who advised the Dems in Congress on Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. One of the reasons that Clinton lost the primary is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. Silence becomes complicity, especially if crimes are committed right under your nose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Democrats in Congres have had the opportunity and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. I agree with Randi on this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. What is your evidence. Why do you agree with Randi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. Refusing to do their Constitutional duty *is* complicity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. But, what about the crimes in the Justice Department? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. "Impeachment is necessary under the circumstances." YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. Sins of omission, so to speak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. This is why they are complicit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. They have time to redeem themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. if you don`t say it`s wrong then you think it`s right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. So, Congress needs to stand up now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. They weren't saying that all of them were complicit, but rather that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoovydoo (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. I don't blame congress. I blame congressional Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-10-08 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. Many of the "old timers" are complicit. They don't want to admit it for whatever reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC