Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Reverses Gore Endorsement, Awarding it to McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 06:45 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Reverses Gore Endorsement, Awarding it to McCain
by Jake Maccoby and Jordan Zakarin

Mere moments after formally announcing his backing for Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama in an email to supporters, former Vice President Al Gore’s endorsement was blocked and reversed by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, handing the Nobel Prize winner’s full throated support to Republican nominee John McCain.

Writing for the majority, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that regardless of who Gore intended to support, a strict constructionist reading of his statement made it clear that, from a legal standpoint, his endorsement must be awarded to the GOP candidate.

“It is plainly obvious, by reading Section One, Clause Four of Article Two, that the framers, Jefferson, Madison and Hamilton, were firm in their resolve, that in the 2008 Presidential election, 219 years after ratification, former Vice President Gore, who the constitution also stipulated must lose the 2000 Presidential election regardless of the voters’ wishes, would be required to hand his endorsement and considerable public influence to John McCain, who was himself one of the original framers of Constitution,” Scalia wrote.

Seconds after the ruling, Charlie Black, a spokesman for the McCain campaign, said that “Senator McCain is gratified and humbled by the support of Vice President Gore, and he urges the American people to unite behind him for the good of the nation.”

Black also called any possible attempts by Gore to challenge the ruling “extremely divisive,” stating that “any type of debate or divergence would be extremely dangerous in the face of the impending election this November.”>>>>>snip

http://reallyseriousnews.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/supreme-court-reverses-gore-endorsement-awarding-it-to-mccain/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very funny
Thanks for sharing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. HeeHee (n/t).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Had me going for a moment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did Rehnquist return from the dead and O'Connor filled in for someone vacationing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. NOT AGAIN!
Dammit! What the hell is WRONG with them :angry:


This is EXACTLY why we need Obama as our next president. So we can stop this court from making more stupid and assinine rulings like these!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Supreme Court just overturned your opinion too
In a 7-2 decision they ruled Musicblind's opinion on DU
will know be reversed to support John McCain's point of view.


:) :sarcasm: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. What? That's not? What? .... Okay, I am fuming
Edited on Wed Jun-18-08 08:49 AM by musicblind
With all of the SERIOUS issues this court could be spending time on... Gay marriage for one! But NO, they are waisting time over turning my and Al Gore's personal opinion regarding who should win the election this November? This court has got to be stopped before they over turn Obama's opinion of who should win the election this November as well. That would be a disaster, and patently unfair.
:wtf:
What is this court coming to?
What is the world coming to?



I blame video games for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gets my vote for post of the week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC