Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here are the Blue Dogs who wrote Pelosi the letter in Jan. supporting FISA immunity.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:03 PM
Original message
Here are the Blue Dogs who wrote Pelosi the letter in Jan. supporting FISA immunity.
I do not know their stance now. I hope all the calls and letters might have made a difference, but we need to keep an eye on the ones who wrote Pelosi in January of this year.

Blue Dog Democrats May Give Bush Victory on Spying

In a January letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, 21 Blue Dog Coalition members made it known they supported granting immunity to the telecoms, and urged Pelosi to move quickly to pass the Senate version of the bill. (The 21 members who signed the letter are listed below.)

Members of the Blue Dog Coalition were integral in the passage of the highly controversial Protect America Act (PAA), a Republican-backed bill that greatly expanded spy powers in August 2007. The PAA was allowed to expire in February in the face of stark warnings from the Bush administration.

Spokespersons for Speaker Pelosi and for the Blue Dog Coalition failed to return numerous requests for comment on the situation.

ACLU lobbyist Michelle Richardson told Truthout she is concerned that House Democrats may try the same tactic they used to pass the PAA. "One possibility is that by splitting the bill in half and dangling the immunity provision in front of Republicans, Democrats could get a better spy bill passed. The other possibility is that they want a repeat of August 2007, where they put up two bad bills, and let the Blue Dogs off the leash so they could vote how they wanted, while a majority of Democrats could cry victim and claim they voted against immunity," Richardson said.


Here are the Blue Dogs who signed the January letter to Pelosi.

Blue Dog Members Pushing for Telecom Immunity

Congressman Joe Baca (D-California) http://www.house.gov/baca/

Congressman John Barrow (D-Georgia) http://barrow.house.gov/

Congresswoman Melissa Bean (D-Illinois) http://www.house.gov/bean/

Congressman Marion Berry (D-Arkansas) http://www.house.gov/berry/

Congressman Dan Boren (D-Oklahoma) http://www.house.gov/boren/

Congressman Leonard L. Boswell (D-Iowa) http://boswell.house.gov/

Congressman Allen Boyd (D-Florida) http://www.house.gov/boyd/

Congressman Christopher Carney (D-Pennsylvania) http://carney.house.gov/

Congressman Jim Cooper (D-Tennessee) http://www.cooper.house.gov/

Congressman Robert E. Cramer (D-Alabama) http://cramer.house.gov/HoR/AL05/

Congressman Lincoln Davis (D-Tennessee) http://www.house.gov/lincolndavis/

Congressman Brad Ellsworth (D-Indiana) http://www.ellsworth.house.gov/

Congressman Tim Holden (D-Pennsylvania) http://www.holden.house.gov/

Congressman Jim Matheson, (D-Utah) http://www.house.gov/matheson/

Congressman Charlie Melancon (D-Louisiana) http://www.melancon.house.gov/

Congressman Dennis Moore (D-Kansas) http://www.moore.house.gov/

Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D-North Dakota) http://www.pomeroy.house.gov/

Congressman Mike Ross (D-Arkansas) http://ross.house.gov/

Congressman Heath Shuler (D-North Carolina) http://shuler.house.gov/

Congressman Zack Space (D-Ohio) http://space.house.gov/

Congressman John Tanner (D-Tennessee) http://www.house.gov/tanner/

Blue Dog Coalition web site http://www.house.gov/ross/BlueDogs/


I do not know their stance now. I believe a few have changed their minds. Maybe.

This has been a secretive procedure, hard for bloggers to keep up with...a bill being rushed to a vote supposedly tomorrow.

There needs to be no rush. They could wait for a new president to bring it up again....but they are not doing that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. whose side are these people on?
Congressmen = joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remember that if we didn't have those Blue Dog Democrats the Rethugs would still control the House.
If you subtracted those 21 Blue Dogs from the Democratic majority in the House it would no longer be a majority. The Blue Dogs are wrong on some issues to be sure, but given the alternative I'm glad that they are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Republicans appear to control the House and the Senate
I am sorry but that is what it looks like right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. At least we have some committee chairpersons with subpoena power...
to try to do some investigations. When the Rethugs had official control of Congress of course they were complicit with the Bush Administrations' crimes.

Hopefully, we will increase our majorities enough in November so that there will no longer be any question about who really runs things on Capitol Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. and all that's accomplished is to showcase how ineffectual the dems are..
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 11:27 AM by frylock
how are those subpoenas coming? can anyone account for the whereabouts of harriet meiers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. And that subpoena power is a mighty power indeed...just ask Josh Bolton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. well then that makes it perfectly acceptable..
we need people who go to bat on the big stuff like this, not repubs in dem clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yes, there has to be a time to stand up for what is right.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. No surprise to see Bean's name.
Looks like it's time for me to make another call...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Notice that only Space, and Baca come from traditional blue states
although I bet money that are from Red districts. The others are from red states and their support of FISA is all about staying in office/politics rather than principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Huh? IL isn't a traditionally blue state?
Bean's district has traditionally been red, but has trended purple in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC