Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor Bill Richardson has by far, the most diversely impressive resume of them all, BY FAR!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:33 AM
Original message
Governor Bill Richardson has by far, the most diversely impressive resume of them all, BY FAR!!
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 02:35 AM by Douglas Carpenter
I am not necessarily advocating for Gov. Richardson for the V.P. position. There are other valuable candidates worth considering.

I have also wondered if there is some strategic problem with having a Hispanic V.P. nominee on the same ticket with the first African-American major party presidential candidate. I don't know the answer to this question. But I am sure some strategist would suggest that this could weaken the ability to working-class white voters to identify with the ticket. (His mother was born in Spain, his father was an Anglo-American banker, born in Los Angeles but working and living in Mexico City where Gov. Richardson spent most his childhood.) On the other hand he could help swing New Mexico into the Democratic column and his presence on the ticket could help insure a higher Latino voter turnout.

But just take a look at his C.V. -- Very impressive indeed!



14 years in the U.S. House of Representatives with a specialized interest in foreign affairs

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

U.S. Secretary of Energy

And of course the current Governor of New Mexico

And his life story is compelling as well:



From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Richardson

Bill Richardson was born at the Huntington Memorial Hospital in Pasadena, California to María Luisa López-Collada Márquez (born in Asturias, Spain 1914) and William Blaine Richardson Jr. (1891–1972), a banker who lived and worked in Mexico City for decades. It was his mother who largely took care of him during his youth. He has a younger sister, Vesta. Just before Richardson was born, his mother was sent to California, where her husband's sister lived, to give birth because, as Richardson explained, "My father had a complex about not having been born in the United States."<2> Three of his four grandparents were Mexican citizens, and he identifies himself as Hispanic.<2> Richardson, a U.S. citizen by birthright, was raised during his childhood in Mexico City. At age 13, Richardson's parents sent him to Massachusetts to attend a Boston-area preparatory school, Middlesex School in Concord, Massachusetts, where he played baseball as a pitcher. He entered Tufts University in 1966 where he continued to play baseball.

He earned a Bachelor's degree at Tufts in 1970, majoring in French and political science and was a brother and president of Delta Tau Delta. He went on to earn a master's degree in international affairs from Tufts University Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy in 1971. While still in high school, he met his future wife, Barbara Flavin. They married in 1972 and have no children.

After college, Richardson worked for Republican Congressman Bradford Morse from Massachusetts. He was later a staff member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Richardson worked on congressional relations for the Henry Kissinger State Department during the Nixon Administration. In 1978, he moved to Santa Fe and ran for Congress in 1980 as a Democrat, losing narrowly to longtime 1st District congressman and future United States Secretary of the Interior Manuel Lujan (R). Two years later, Richardson was elected to New Mexico's newly created third district, taking in most of the northern part of the state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. But....
He can't be vetted. All kinds of extramarital shenanigans.

In theory, he's great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have not come across any of that from any credible independent source -- just some hear say
And Bill Clinton was President, remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You could be right, I just don't know what the risk/reward looks like.
And this, I suppose is why there are teams set up to go through everything like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Every candidate has some negatives going for them
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 06:50 AM by Douglas Carpenter
and of course some positives as well.

Sen. Biden is viewed as an extremely competent and experienced Senator, especially on matters relating to national security and foreign affairs. But the fact is, Sen. Biden represents a small Northeastern urban safe Democratic state.

Sen. Webb has a very impressive C.V. as well as representing a very important swing state and he seems to possess appeal to white working class voters, but some of his unguarded language mostly from the distant past, although some fairly recent - creates some concerns also.

Most of the other popular names mentioned have little or no foreign policy experience and relatively limited experience in national scene politics also, even domestically.

The perfect candidate would have an impressive foreign policy/national security background with a number of years in both legislative and executive roles. The perfect candidate would come from an important swing state and have particular appeal in small towns, outer suburbs and mid size cities especially among working class voters. The perfect candidate would be a popular elected official with regional appeal and is from either the South or the Southwest or the West or the Mid West or an important border state that is also an important swing state.

Then on top of all of that the perfect candidate would be an upstanding family person who has no potentially embarrassing baggage that could attract negative attention.

Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be even one perfect candidate.

Those with impressive resumes and years of experience usually have a bit too much baggage or come from the wrong part of the country. Those who come from the right part of the country and are upstanding family people without baggage tend to be lacking the long impressive record of experience, especially experience in foreign policy and national security.

Wes Clark seems to come awfully close. However, he has never held elected office - and that would have to be considered a minus too. In the aftermath of September 11, electing a General had a strong psychological appeal even if they never held elected office. I think the psychological dynamics are different now.

So, one way or the other, we unfortunately will have to settle for a less than perfect candidate whoever it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Google Richardson and sexual harassment
I think he was accused of it. Not proven of course, but he was accused and that could be bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Close friends of mine who are close to NM government tell me
he has many bad things in his closet. These are very good people with no ax to grind and they tell me he is not a nice man. Very unfortunate because he does have a great resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. He used the word "maricon" (which means "f*ggot") on Imus. No thanks.
He thinks being gay is a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Lord, he really said that - maricon??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. ...and this is news to you? He has, the best resume of any of the Prez candidates this cycle...
by a wide margin.

You clearly didn't examine all the candidates all that closely when the primary season began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. no, it is not news to me
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 06:43 AM by Douglas Carpenter
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. one more kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's also polarizing to Hillary supporters, another minority, a bad debater...
a weak attack dog, and has skeletons in his closet.

Next pleas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC