Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:43 PM
Original message
Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., issued a statement in support of the House's update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, but said he would try to strip a provision granting immunity to telecommunication companies when the bill comes to a vote in the Senate next week.

(snip)

Obama said there is "little doubt" that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, "has abused authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders."

"Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.

" does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses."


(snip)

Last February, when an earlier version of the FISA bill came to a vote, Obama voted for an amendment to strip the telecom immunity provision from the bill. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) voted in favor of keeping immunity for the telecoms.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/21/politics/horserace/entry4200105.shtml



Not agreeing with his stance on this bill and/or contacting him to let him know you don't agree and trying to persuade him to vote differently is understandable, reasonable and justifiable. Saying you will not support him any longer financially or refusing to work for his election in any way because of his stance on this is incomprehensible, senseless, counterproductive and indefensible.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting ..
I'm pretty mad at him right now; I'm going to take a timeout.

This is a pretty neat statement; if he votes for the bill, and then if his effort to take the provision out, via an amendment fails, then the net result will be one vote closer to passage of an odious bill. That won't make me happy, and I sent him an email expressing my displeasure. It does make me happier, however, that he has promised to keep a close eye on the program. There is no doubt in my mind, given that he was a ConLaw instructor at a prestigious university, in tandem with his apparently sincere expression of high regard for our Constitution, that he will be a far better monitor than any Rethuglican or NeoCon.

I will, of course, vote for him in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And that's a very logical viewpoint.
His stance on FISA is going to make a lot of people angry - and we all know we can not expect to agree with everything any politician does. However, we must never forget the most important thing of all: Dem control of the White House and Congress come January 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't call the main numbers The mailboxes are full. Here are other numbers
Illinois — Barack Obama, (202) 224-2854

ring... ring...

"Your call has been forwarded to an automatic voice messaging system. The mailbox belonging to... Barack Obama... is full. Goodbye."


Chicago Office (312) 886-3506

Hello, you have reached Senator Barack Obama's Chicago office. Our office hours are from 8:30am to 5:30pm. If you have reached this message during normal business hours it is due to the heavy volume of calls that we are receiving. Please leave your name, number and a brief message. Thank you and have a good day... This voice mailbox is full, please try again later.


Springfield Office
(217) 492-5089

Thank you for calling the office of US Senator Barack Obama ..... finally got through to voicemail so I left a message again.





Washington D.C. Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-2854 - MAILBOX FULL
(202) 228-4260 fax
(202 228-1404 TDD
Email our office

Chicago Office
John C. Kluczynski Federal Office Building
230 South Dearborn St.
Suite 3900 (39th floor)
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312) 886-3506 - MAILBOX FULL
(312) 886-3514 fax
Toll free: (866) 445-2520
(for IL residents only)

Springfield Office
607 East Adams Street
Springfield, Illinois 62701
(217) 492-5089
(217) 492-5099 fax

Marion Office
701 North Court Street
Marion, Illinois 62959
(618) 997-2402
(618) 997-2850 fax

Moline Office
1911 52nd Avenue
Moline, Illinois 61265
(309)736-1217
(309)736-1233 fax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Will you be working as viligently to ensure his win in November?
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 11:03 PM by AZBlue
Will you be donating to his campaign? Volunteering?
I do hope the answer is yes to all the above.
And thanks for the contact info! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. AZBlue I have worked my butt off for that man
ignoring certain core principles of mine because this country is in such grave state and too many people don't have lifeboats. I've also donated the extremely painful amount of $4,600 to Barack and fought with my own mother over him.

Right now, I'm taking a small breather from cheerleading until I see the FISA vote but I certainly intend to stick to my original plan of voting for him and encouraging others to do the same. How enthusiastically my passionate self can do that is up to how much Obama can reinvigorate my belief that the change he represents is more than just not being Bush or McCain.

I sincerely hope to be back in the saddle before the week is up and thank people like you for keeping a more positive outlook. We can't afford not to stomp their asses in November. I have a feeling I'll feel like I'm on more solid ground next week.

I guess my answer to all the above is yes :) I'd just like to be as enthusiastic as I normally am. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Very fair!
Very extremely absolutely fair! :D

I hope it all works out well - I don't know if he can get the immunity out of the bill, but I do hope he does whatever he can. And, I have faith in him that he will continue to work for what's right once he's president.

Glad to have you on his team - you're an articulate, smart and principled person - and obviously fair! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you. My heart still has faith, it's just my head messing with me now
Thanks for the compliments, I'm not sure I deserve them on a board where there are so many great supporters. And these principles? I wish I could sell them back to the devil ;)

When Obama's sworn in I want to beam with pride and spend an exhuberant 8 years watching our country better itself and knowing less people will hurt as a result of our hard work. I started reading "Dreams of My Father" and believe Obama is an extremely decent man with great intention. Maybe I need to get off the net for a week and finish reading it. Or better yet, finally read "The Audacity of Hope".

I'm glad we're all a team. In this confusing moment, I'm very grateful to more positive Obama supporters and also grateful to the vast majority of former Clinton supporters here who have tempered their criticism by directing it at Congress in general and not Obama or his original supporters.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I just started Audacity!
Don't know how I put it down to log online! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think that's why I'm afraid to start it just yet ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I would also contact the campaign
I'm sure his US Senate office would be glad to hear from you, but normally they give first priority to call from their own constitutes.

This goes without saying, but you should also be contacting your own US Senator if you feel strongly about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. BS
It isn't coming out folks. He also sold us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You're talking like he already voted.
A little premature. Or perhaps you don't understand what past tense means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Maybe you can't read
Obama Supports FISA Legislation, Angering Left
By Paul Kane
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) today announced his support for a sweeping intelligence surveillance law that has been heavily denounced by the liberal activists who have fueled the financial engines of his presidential campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Have you called his office?
he hasn't voted yet you know. Of course if you just want to piss and moan that's understandable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope he succeeds!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama campaign says they will support FISA Fillabuster - so STFU to the hysterical criers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Ummm, not really.
If you read the text from the link, it refers to Obama's support of Dodd's filibuster LAST YEAR, not what his intentions are now. Amato (the author) says, "So far we’re only getting silence. I contacted the campaign and I’m waiting for a quote." This was as of Friday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You keep posting this and getting peoples' hopes up -- and it's misleading.
NOBODY has talked about a filibuster on this vote, including Dodd, Feingold, etc.

The reference you -- and MoveOn keep pointing to is a statement he made about Dodd's February filibuster.

We're just going to have to wait and see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Perspective
This election is not about a sweeping change to progressive government. It is not a clear undoing of all bad policy and wrong institutional and political directions reaching back into the nation's long record of flaws and devolution instead of revolution. It is not lead by a stark revolutionary type but instead by someone who will continue to skate with some degree of assurance over shaky surface of democracy.

He is an honest and decent and enlightened public servant. The long decades of deception and institutions that one becomes immersed in by joining has brought some gratuitous and unnecessary sincere remarks about the passe nature of unions, the intention to take all the dangerous proven ills of the system and promise to use them more wisely, less divisively(from renegade tyranny to benevolent despot models?). Given the state of national corruption and brainwashing this maybe the pragamtically biggest step the nation as a whole can make forward, but it can only be a beginning.

The dangers will not go away. FISA itself and the fear games of bipolar authoritative manipulation wear unnecessarily bad to begin with. McGovern to some extent had promised to face some of them boldly, whether or not that was a significant part of his demise. Now that all the crap has been metathesized deliberately by Bush in breathtaking ugliness and supreme Revelation, it has won a beach head because no one "dares" the connection the depth and the radical nature of the problem. We have had radical application of bad policy. radical solutions are not even permitted yet to be imagined- though WE do.

I applaud the baby steps and the inauguration of just people and the excitement and commitment of so many citizens. We will have great work but no room or justification for relaxed self-satisfaction or defensiveness about mistakes and inadequacy or ease in dealing with the persistence of the unindicted media and GOP crime machine. We should not be divided by disappointment or discouraged by shortcoming that we should all of us know full well were it not for natural sentiment and loyalty to party leadership.

The party leadership in essence is scarily inadequate, harshly divided on how to deal with clear threats and shortcomings of a criminal overthrow of our democracy and means of promulgating information. We certainly know the blue dogs, whatever, have a disastrous politically stupid approach to their own enemies that has no bearing on anything but the ignorance of the population segment that they supposedly represent. We know that new progressives are swallowed up into the well meaning impotence of their forerunners. Everyone has a long way to go and a see-saw with the dictatorship and war headed GOP is not an acceptable element in the development of the party into something better- into plain old survival of humanity.

Obama is not going to become a monster, hypocrite or destroyer every time an unsurprising but dismaying show of the general characters mix of party leadership comes up. he will not just wave a wand and save the day. He will open doors to the possible and the best possible must be democratic, populist, progressive and heroically compassionate idealistic. That will then be OUR responsibility, a weighty one that must measure cheap impotent flames against whitewashing dangerous shortcomings. We will feel some of the weight of the presidency itself on our ranting shoulders for a change and it won't be pure or easy. It will demand we put up or shut up.

There are people for whom the door to dictatorship has been revealed and who want to make an enormous amount of fame and money and basically want to lord it over the suffering of humanity who won't be so innocently discouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC