Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You scare them, she scares them, together you are their worst nightmare.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:40 AM
Original message
You scare them, she scares them, together you are their worst nightmare.
Note: I'm not married to the idea of a Clinton Vice-Presidency and the author of the piece quoted below was not a Clinton supporter in the primaries.

11 Reasons Hillary Should Be The VP Pick.

Her political future will be dependent on your success; therefore she has every interest in promoting your agenda. The alternative (without her on the ticket) is much more problematical. She will be a huge force in the Senate with her own base and agenda. Would you rather have her out of the tent on the Hill promoting her own ideas or in your tent promoting yours? Not even a close call.

A few other benefits of Clinton on the ticket; no one will be a more affective attack dog against McCain and the Right than Hillary. She can take the heat and defend you (something you are increasingly forced to do yourself). Every attack on McCain by Clinton will get wide coverage. No one has had more experience than Hillary on taking the Right to the wood shed and beating them to a pulp. She becomes the lightening rod, you go back to change and hope. Can any other VP choice do that? Not even close.

You will sit atop the most unified Democratic Convention since the advent of television. The picture of you and Hillary Clinton together is a nightmare for Republicans. The GOP operatives are yearning for you to pick anyone besides Clinton. You scare them, she scares them, together you are their worst nightmare.

Finally, and maybe most important of all, McCain and the Right have only one hope of defeating you Senator, and that is to make you too naïve and risky to be Commander in Chief. Your vice presidential choice must reek of experience. The argument against Clinton is she represents the past and hurts your change message. Sure the voters want change from what hasn't worked, but they embrace past success. Most voters recall the Clinton years (from a policy perspective at least) as successful. A message of change combined with a record of past success is a more comforting message than change alone. Can another VP candidate provide that level of comfort? Not even close.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/its_not_even_close_obama_shoul.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think there are going to be a lot of disappointed/angry people no matter who gets the VP nod.
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 05:47 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
I like Senator Clinton and I think (I hope) the right's attacks on her will not work this time. My only concern is that she lacks military experience and I *know* that McCain will be dropping his military credentials all over the place. That said, I think that this may be circumvented by having lots and lots of veteran surrogates. Just please...ANYONE but Nunn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. She brings nothing to the ticket.
Independents would flock away from the democratic ticket with Clinton on it.

I really never thought I'd advocate for this, but...Wes Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maureen1322 Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know what she brings,
oh yea, 18 million voters. We are the Democratic Party, not the Independent Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Those voters are going democratic anyway
We can't eschew independents and moderate republicans. That is exactly what would happen if Clinton was on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smear Talk Express Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. No.
DLC = more right-wing voodoo economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. you certainly live up to your name in this instance
DLC economic policies were the antithesis of voodoo economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Silliness. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. So, let me get this straight..
The sharp decline in the unemployment rate, and the debt being nearly, if not entirely eliminated, and a projection of future surplus was a BAD thing in the 90s. Right?

You do understand that Senator Obama and Senator Clinton are very, very close in economic policy, don't you?

Isn't it time to follow the lead of our candidate and put away the HATRED for anything spelled CLINTON?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. You put a lightning rod at a safe distance away from you.
The writer seems to think Clinton would set aside her agenda as Obama's VP. I see her having every interest in undermining him. And the media would love that, and encourage it at every turn. They never see a Clinton story that they don't like. And she would oblige them. She would suck the air out of the room in every way. Not to mention Bill in the background—or maybe not so in the background. And I've never been persuaded that being the wife of a president is the same as having experience. It's experience once-removed. No, Hillary is one lightning rod I want to see put at a safe distance away from Obama's presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Forget it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hmm. Who is this person of whom they speak?
Sounds like s/he might make an excellent presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Way too many downsides - it's not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC