|
McCain opposes a timetable for us to get out of there. Obama favors one. Now Nouri al-Maliki, the head of the (US-backed) Iraqi government, ostensibly now freely elected (according to the Bush administration), has also spoken out in favor of a timetable for US withdrawal. Hear the radical right scream: this plays into the hands of terrrrrists! This is just what the Ayatollahs want! This is surrender! We are winning! Right, we have been winning for five years now. I've won enough, thanks. No one wins. We all lost when Cheneybush decided to lead us into this mess in the first place, and it was like a head-on car collision. No one wins. There are just the injured and the less badly injured. There are only losers. No one wins.
Our money is gone. Our prestige is gone. The lives of thousands of our people are lost. The lives of tens, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are lost. No one wins.
We will either get out of there and watch the mess, or we will stay there, and be part of the mess. Chevron and Halliburton will get some more contracts, and at the relatively small expense of a few sacrificed personnel (kidnappings, bombings, etc), but their profits come out of our pockets, and their names are mud for any future Democratic administration, and their personnel are targets for legal scrutiny in the USA and attacks abroad. No one wins.
Al-Maliki knows that there will be no internal reconciliation in Iraq as long as we maintain a large visible military presence there. He also knows that there could well be no internal reconciliation even after we leave. But if the antagonists there know that they have a chance to carve out their territorial enclaves with a relative degree of autonomy, at some point they will realize a fundamental truth of third world conflicts: empty bellies start wars, full bellies in their right minds don't, because if they do, no one wins.
It's too late to reverse the damage. We started this misbegotten horror. We have to end our involvement in it with some kind of orderly withdrawal, and we have to try our best to leave SOME kind of authority there, and cheer if it holds and makes progress, and wring our hands in despair if it doesn't. The one option that we KNOW doesn't work is the status quo. If the so-called surge has quieted things down somewhat, it only means we are BOGGED down somewhat more than we were. It also means that McCain has his justification for threatening my as yet unborn grandchildren with military service in Iraq as an enemy combatant. At some point, he will learn that until he has more Americans in Iraq than Iraqis, no one wins.
No wonder al-Maliki has endorsed the idea of a timetable, which is, coincidentally, Obama's position. He has done so because without one, we can surge until we have sent everyone over there we could find except the secretarial staff of the Kalamazoo Police Department and the admissions collectors at the entrance to Cape Cod National Seashore. No one wins.
|