Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS Analysis Race Between Obama and McCain shows "Extraordinary Enthusiasm Gap"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 12:55 AM
Original message
CBS Analysis Race Between Obama and McCain shows "Extraordinary Enthusiasm Gap"



Is There An Election "Enthusiasm Gap"?





CBS News' Kathy Frankovic: If There Is One, Does It Matter?



CBS Analyst Answers both Questions with a firm yes.

50% of Obama Enthusiastic while only 16% of McCain supporters are.



http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/18/opinion/pollpositions/main4273290.shtml






The most extraordinary difference between the supporters of John McCain and Barack Obama is in what we have chosen to label “enthusiasm.”
The latest CBS News/New York Times Poll, completed on July 14, shows Obama leading McCain 48 percent to 42 percent among registered voters. That’s only six points. And more than one in three registered voters either admit that their minds aren’t completely made up, or that they are truly undecided about their preference.

But the voters who have made a choice display an “enthusiasm gap” that overwhelms differences in support.


Asked how they feel about the fact that their choice is the party’s nominee, 50 percent of Obama’s current voters say they are “enthusiastic.” Just 16 percent of McCain’s supporters say that about his candidacy. And while more than half of McCain voters are “satisfied” with McCain, 15 percent say they are “dissatisfied” or even “angry” that he is the nominee!



How important is it that their candidate wins in November? It matters more to Obama voters: 37 percent of them say an Obama victory is “extremely important” to them, compared with 24 percent of McCain voters who say so about a McCain victory. Adding in those who think a victory by the person they are voting for is “very important” but not necessarily “extremely important” 69 percent of Obama voters - but only 53 percent of McCain voters - say it matters that much.


Are voters satisfied with their options? Historically, about half of all voters will say they wish there were more choices; and this year is no different. But again, there is a party divide. Two out of three Obama supporters are satisfied; just 29 percent want more candidates in the race. But the percentages are reversed among McCain voters: 60 percent of them wish there were more options, while only 29 percent are satisfied with the choices of only McCain and Obama.



Strength of support or level of enthusiasm can sometimes make a difference in an election, as the candidate who wins is often the candidate whose supporters care most about winning.

clip

In late July, 2004, even AFTER that year’s Democratic Convention and before the Republicans met, John Kerry’s supporters were a lot less committed to their candidate than supporters of George W. Bush were committed to theirs. Sixty percent of Bush voters said they “strongly” favored their candidate; just 47 percent of Kerry’s supporters said that. There was another motivation for many Kerry voters - 28 percent said they were voting for Kerry mostly because they disliked Bush. Strength-of-support numbers pretty much stayed the same for the rest of the campaign. Even in polls taken just before the 2004 election there wasn’t much difference: 67 percent of Bush voters said they supported him strongly, compared with just 49 percent of Kerry voters. And while 37 percent of likely Republican voters said they would be “excited” by a Bush win, just 24 percent of likely Democratic voters said they would be “excited” by a Kerry victory.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. They don't seem that different, crowd-wise
Oh, wait, yeah.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you made me click to see lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. McCain-rolled!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. And CBS
needed an "analysis" of this?
Honestly!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. After 4 years of the Bush Disaster, 67% of his supporters supported him "strongly".
Amazing. I disliked bush "strongly" before he stole the 2000 election, and my opinion of him declined after that. Meanwhile, his supporters were more gung-ho than ever in 2004.

An awful lot of Americans have one or more screws loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. We were the 10%ers...and I only
got into politics in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hell, the candidates themselves show an "Extraordinary Enthusiasm Gap"
McC has none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. This explains why, this year third party candidates are good.
A recent article in Congressional quarterly concerned the effect of third party candidates on the presidential race.

Bob Barr and Ralph Nadar are generally excluded from polls between Obama and McCain, but when they are included they take about 3% each, or about 6% of the total vote.

The kicker is that thist 6% comes almost exclusively from McCain.

Therefore, this year, the existence of third party candidates on the ballot is good for Democrats.

This even includes Nadar.

I think Democrats got burned badly enough that Nadar again.

But Republicans are willing to consider third party candidates.

Therefore, yesterday, my wife and I signed a petition to help put Bob Barr on the ballot in South Dakota.


We, of course, have no intention of voting for him, but we want him on the ballot to help Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC