Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, Colin Powell for VP, yes or no (and why).

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:07 PM
Original message
Poll question: OK, Colin Powell for VP, yes or no (and why).
I think he is VERY qualified to be Obama's VP.

What say you.

http://news.uns.purdue.edu/images/+2006/powell-colin.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Obama chooses him, I'll support it. That's pretty much how I'll feel about anybody--
I assume Obama would want that person for some important reason, and even if I don't agree, it certainly wouldn't upset me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Any repug for vp would be a deal breaker for me...when I vote
for a dem I want a dem, not a repug for vp that might become president...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. Well, that is certainly your right. Myself, I take a very broad view of
what makes good, effective, patriotic public officials or leaders. Looking back through history, it turns out they weren't all Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's a war criminal?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He RESIGNED because he REALIZED Booshe fucked him over.
He is a hero in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. He's not a hero because he NEVER spoke out.
Resigning because you weren't happy is one thing. Allowing the public to assume various things is another. But he NEVER stood up against the Bush admin and fight for the people and for that he is NO hero. He's just another polluter and just as them for not preventing further destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Agree --
He should have resigned before he furthered Bushco's fiction about WMD and Saddam.

This wasn't a relatively minor political thing. This country and the world trusted him, and he betrayed us all.

NO to VP or any post in the administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. We did trust him. We all said he was the sane one out of the crew...
He betrayed us all on the most monumental level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yep. A lot of us wanted to like and trust him and he betrayed that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. yep. I think he was a reason some senators voted for IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
65. He'd have to make good before I'd vote for him.
He'd have to seriously speak out against * and the GOP and change parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. If he DID resign, he did it three years after he sat in on torture making policy
meetings in 2002. Not to mention, he was instrumental in taking us to war.

Heros usually don't let things go that far. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. He is no hero,he is a traitor,plain and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. No he didn't. He resigned because they forced him out when they were done with him.
He's no hero. He knowingly lied to start a war, promoted that war as long as they would let him, then retired to live in luxury. When he decided he wanted more cash, and that he maybe wanted to improve his reputation a little, he began speaking out against Bush, claiming that he was tricked into lying before the UN.

He wasn't tricked. He gave information he knew was false, and lied about it even when he was supposedly "coming clean." What's more, that's a pattern for him, starting with Mai Lai in Viet Nam and continuing through his days under Reagan.

I'll give him some credit. He was smarter than the average Bush cronie. He had more of a conscience. He probably at least feels guilty over what he did. But he proved he was willing to lie us into war and slaughter millions of innocent civilians for his own advancement. Twice. He gets no credit for that from me.

He's not a contender for VP. If he were, I'd be looking at other candidates. But I'm sure he's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He and Tenet lost a war to Cheney and Rumsfeld. That's about it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. He lied ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. No. He "resigned" at the request of the White House in Nov 2004. He was fired.
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 05:33 PM by Garbo 2004
(Per Powell's biography written with his cooperation.) Powell didn't resign in protest before he prostituted his "credibility" arguing for the war to Congress and the world based on lies. And he didn't resign in protest in 2003 or earlier in 2004 when the excuses and lies for war had all unraveled.

No, Powell only resigned when the Bush White House informed him it wanted to make a change and wanted his letter of resignation. Nothing "heroic" or principled about Powell's resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
70. You have veen here since 2002 and you...
still think he's a HERO?????

Looks like someone hasn't been paying attention enough....just unfuckingbeleiveable. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
78. He resigned 2 years too late. He should have resigned BEFORE the UN presentation.
Come on. He lied to the UN, knew he was lying, and resigned when he realized he lied for nothing. Is that what we want for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
84. HE KNEW HE WAS LYING AT THE TIME.
NO EXCUSES FOR WAR CRIMINALS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
122. No War Criminals for Veep.
No pukes either. Most pukes are would be war criminals, had they the chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. He already sold his soul and never fought out against the
Bush admin or spoke out against them. He just left and went and did his own thing as he allowed Bush to misle the American people and run the US into a deficit which has ruined our economy and riddled our infrastructure worthless (which has led to the deaths of the citizenry). He can't be salvaged and I wouldn't think of having him share even the same air as Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Any reason why you think he's qualified?
Becasue all I can think of is republican sell -out at the United Nations.

Even Colin Powel regrets that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not unless he comes out with
a tell all book before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. No - he's a traitor, and choosing a Rep. veep would put Obama in danger...
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 03:13 PM by polichick
...of being assassinated (or MORE danger, I should say).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're kidding, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. The My Lai massacre and the bogus UN Iraq report.
Anyone who continues to push the idea of him on the ticket after knowing about those events is highly suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. "Highly suspect"?
Kindly put your bible, torch, and pitchfork down and step away from the computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
105. I'm sorry you are apparently uninformed about Powell's history.
Go look up his role in the My Lai cover-up and the bullshit he sold to the UN.

Then tell me with a straight face he should be on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. He tried to block the My Lai investigations. That's true.
Powell could have been a great man and he flunked every moral test as far as I can tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
114. I haven't heard a single Powell promoter credibly defend his role in My Lai.
I used to have respect for him, too, back when I was too young to vote and didn't know any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm in the minority here but I respect Colin and would welcome him as a VP.
For many reasons...

...not the least of which is his reference to the "fucking crazies" he was saddled with in the Booosh Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. You respect what he did at the UN with his little vial? UGH! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Cute.
But way fucked up.

Bye.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. What do you mean it's fucked up?
He took us to war....that's what he did. And he did it with a little vial at the UN. He's a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. But he's a Republican hawk. Yeah for the new politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. He's not really a big hawk. He doesn't seem to love war for the sake of war--
he wouldn't have come up with his "Powell Doctrine" otherwise. But he did allow himself to be used for a hawk war agenda, and he knows it. I won't hold it against him if he's willing to redeem himself and work for the RIGHT administration. Not sure about VP, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Worse than an honest hawk, he's a whore.
I don't understand how anyone can trust him with anything again. He's been at it for years. How can anyone not hold this against him?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. In my opinion, he's a good little general--and that's what he was doing
when he was a Chimpster team member--following orders. That's what most military men are trained to do, which is why they make dubious choices for civilian leadership positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. My grandfather was a general. He knew the difference between a lawful order
and a war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Well, I'm not sure that Powell did, at the time. It's very hard to see
how he DIDN'T know that the administration was trumping up a false case for war (and using his rep as a trustworthy figure to sell it)--but I don't know for sure how much he was privy to--Rumsfeld and Cheney marginalized him almost as soon as he took the SoS position. He needs to come out and fess up to the whole thing and his role in it, IMO--that would go a long way toward repairing his reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Long before that, he tried to block any investigation of My Lai.
Comprehensive article on Powell, and this was his response to the letter informing Command that a massacre had taken place:

Powell's Response

The letter's troubling allegations were not well received at Americal headquarters.

Major Powell undertook the assignment to review Glen's letter, but did so without questioning Glen or assigning anyone else to talk with him. Powell simply accepted a claim from Glen's superior officer that Glen was not close enough to the front lines to know what he was writing about, an assertion Glen denies.

After that cursory investigation, Powell drafted a response on Dec. 13, 1968. He admitted to no pattern of wrongdoing. Powell claimed that U.S. soldiers in Vietnam were taught to treat Vietnamese courteously and respectfully. The Americal troops also had gone through an hour-long course on how to treat prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions, Powell noted.

"There may be isolated cases of mistreatment of civilians and POWs," Powell wrote in 1968. But "this by no means reflects the general attitude throughout the Division." Indeed, Powell's memo faulted Glen for not complaining earlier and for failing to be more specific in his letter.



http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Political/Collin%20Powell_Legend.html

Powell is a pig and he's been one for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yes, I've heard about the allegations of a My Lai coverup.
I'm not sure it's been conclusively proven, though. The article you excerpt above sounds more like a mid-level officer who didn't want to believe that a big, ugly problem developed on his watch or in his beloved Army, rather than a deliberate deceiver. It's hard to be a fair judge of his actions through hindsight and history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. He tried to tank the whistleblower. If you can put lipstick on that,
more power to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Not trying to put lipstick on it, just trying to be fair without having heard
all sides of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. I Remember Way Back During Viet Nam... And sfexpat 2000 You Are CORRECT!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
64. State Dept had its own intel shop whose findings contradicted administration's claims re: much of
the WMD crap. Powell ignored his own dept's findings to trumpet the Administration's case for war to Congress and the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
74. Awww, SNAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. Oh good grief. "If he's willing to redeem himself" indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
85. You always tell the truth "bye"?
Fucking coward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
129. I agree, but I think he may not be the smartest VP choice and I hate to say why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. No for too many reasons
But the number on reason is he lost all credibility lying for the regime to get us into a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. He lied to us about WMD's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Who do you think GAVE him that information???
Bill Clinton???

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
72. His own State INR (and others) contradicted the WMD claims Powell publically supported.
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 06:57 PM by Garbo 2004
For example, State Dept knew the aluminum tubes were not suitable for nuclear purposes long before Powell supported claims to Congress and later the UN that they were "evidence" of an Iraqi nuke program.

2001, before Sept 11: Powell says Iraq no threat, no WMD programs, containment has worked.

October 2001: State Department begins planning the post-Saddam Hussein transition in Iraq, the "Future of Iraq Project." http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB198/index.htm

Fall 2002: Powell presented the bogus Niger yellowcake claims (already had been debunked by State INR and others) and aluminum tubes (also previously debunked by State INR, DOE, IAEA) as proof of Iraq's nuke program in briefings to Congress before the IWR vote.

2003: Powell's dog and pony show at the UN. Refrains from using the yellowcake claims, but does present the previously debunked aluminum tube claims as evidence of an Iraqi nuke program.

Powell knew the way the wind was blowing and fronted for the Administration. He wasn't naive or operating in an information vacuum, he was on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Uh, knowingly sitting at the UN and lying his ass off about WMD
Who could trust him again. He should have resigned in protest to save any integrity he had. Ask Colonel Wilkerson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. NO: 1) He's damaged goods. 2) Need racial balance on the ticket. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not on the ticket but
if he wants to come clean about the Bush WH and lend support to Democrats by way of exposing the Rethugs he's welcome aboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. No. He should have spoken out...
...to the public before Iraq. He could have made the difference. But he stayed quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama/Cheney! Go Cheney! Bricka bracka firecracker sis boom bah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
104. Good one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. He KNEW the PNAC case for war was bullshit, and he lied to the UN anyway.
The bastard is guilty of treason. And his son is a piece of shit as well. You can thank Mikey Powell the next time you hear a 30 year old classic rock song bleeped on the radio. Or even a TV show like The Waltons.... yes, even the god damned WALTONS - now censored in reruns because old grandpa said "hell" or "god damn" or something else that Mikey Powell found "indecent". I've even seen the words "Jesus Christ" censored from an episode of Jerry Springer. And not even in the context of "taking the Lord's name in vain", but from an actual minister reading from the Bible!

This is madness and fuck these Repuke pieces of shit who made it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. WOW, can-o-worms, color me surprised


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
36. I say you're DainBramaged.
Powell is a disgusting liar. i don't know about you, but i'm about fed up with disgusting fucking liars in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
41. An endorsement I'd accept...VP? HELL NO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
World Citizen Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
44. IF
If he turns whistleblower out of sincere conscience, THEN maybe he is qualified to dodge a jail term. Thats as far as it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticjohn Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. No! He had his chance to be the ONLY Republican I might have voted for in 2000!
He threw away that chance, and proved to be quite the loyal general, not at all like Ike!

He could have saved us trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, by being President who would have been the FIRST Black President, in 2000, better than Bush, heck maybe better than Gore!

He had his chance... it's OVER for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Powell has zero credibility since his performance at the U.N.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
48. I like Powell but I think he's a bad choice for VP
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 04:07 PM by jzodda
First off what can he deliver? He's not going to increase the black vote anymore then already. He can't bring a state. The repubs mostly hate him and view him as a traitor and a liberal republican so he's not going to help there either. So he brings no new voters in and at the same time "if" he became president we can't forget he is still a republican, even if he's to the left of most republicans.

I don't mind if Obama asked him into the cabinet. National Security adviser or Defense secretary. I see he's less then popular around here and that's to be expected but he has gone into great detail about the regret he has for his involvement in the Iraq fiasco, especially the UN speech and I forgive him.

He has expressed admiration for Obama and that's a good thing. Powell is still well regarded overall by the mainstream and his public support could help with independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
52. he lied for Bush on WMDS
blatant lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
54. "Cause he still hasn't turned states evidence on these assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
59. Re Powell
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 05:12 PM by SOS
Endorsement? Yes
VP? No

Powell supported the invasion of Iraq.
One of Obama's core strengths is his early opposition to the Iraq fiasco.
Obama will not pick someone who undermines his message of sound judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
60. self delete dupe
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 05:11 PM by SOS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
61. No. Among other things, he's a Republican.
Obama needs to pick a Democrat so a Democratic VP will be in line to run in 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
63. If he switches parties . He was always about a 52-48 R-D.
If he announced that he was becoming a Democrat because he believed that the Repugs foreign policy stance is weakening America and making less safe, then... HELL YES...


I can't support an R on the ticket. But if he switched then I would be all for him.

This would also establish our party as the one that is more capable of keeping Americans safe.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #63
76. But Powell was instrumental in supporting/promulgating a policy that made us less safe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
66. Can somebody direct me to Democratic Underground?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. I am sitting here totally stunned...
To have that proposed on DU? Now, after everything we know? Unfuckingbelievable. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #66
107. Everytime I come here
People are pushing Republicans who should be in jail as candidates over and above good, non criminal Democrats. I was under the impression that promoting Republicans over Democrats was very much against the rules here.
The people promoting Republicans and defending them here are not Democrats in my book at all.

Powell or any other Republican on the ticket and I pass on that ticket. I do not vote for Republicans or other known criminals, ever, period. It will not happen. Because, you see, I am a DEMOCRAT.
I think those pushing these Republicans should be banned from DU. Period. Democratic. Underground. My. Ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #66
117. If I find it I'll give you directiosn
this is bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
67. HELL no. He's a spineless traitor, oh. ... .. . AND HE'S A REPUBLICAN
Jeesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
68. I voted you are brain damaged.
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 06:07 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
I mean really now, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU THINKING????? And those posters who are agreeing with you -- to have that sentiment come out of any DUers mouth -- i just can't fucking believe it. :wow:

THE MAN KNOWINGLY WENT BEFORE THE UN AND GAVE "EVIDENCE" HE KNEW TO BE BULLSHIT TO HELP BUSH PUSH FOR AN ILLEGAL WAR. HAVE YOU FUCKING LOST YOUR GODDAMNED MIND???

And yes I am yelling. :mad: :mad:

Insane, just fucking insane -- invite a war crimial to be part of an Obama administration.

I have truly heard it all now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
71. Interesting results on your poll
A couple of days ago there was a poll with all the usual suspects, and Powell did stunningly better than anybody else among Independents and pretty much just as well as Hillary.

Long story short, Powell is MUCH more acceptable to rank and file Democrats and Independents than he is on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
73. He went in front of the fucking UN and repeated that bullshit about
yellowcake and WMDs when even he knew it was bullshit. Haven't you heard the joke "What does Mrs. Powell say before Colin leaves for work every morning? 'Don't forget to take your spine out, dear'!" Powelll is possibly the worst of all, because he knew better.

Vice-President!? I'd rather see him in an orange jumpsuit right next to Cheney and Rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
75. Republican? Check. Baldfaced Liar? Check. War Criminal? Check.
He's a perfect match for the candidate of hope and change.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
77. no for all of the blatantly obvious reasons. this is not going to happen, nor should it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
79. He showed bad judgement, no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
80. Hell-to-the-NO!
No way. Nope. Sorry. :puke: :mad:


Powell's a sell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
81. Please step away from the bong
No repukes on the ticket. Maybe a couple in cabinet posts would be ok. But that's my limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #81
86. Don't insult the herb like that! The rest of us who partake don't support WAR CRIMINALS.
I cannot FUCKING believe someone is proposing this on DU!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
82. WOW, so, what do you all do if he becomes VP, quit the Democratic party?
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 08:13 PM by DainBramaged


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #82
90. And the odds of that happening? Where do you even get the idea that it's a likely, viable or
desirable possibility? What's with the Colin Powell fan club/apologists here?

So what is the basis for your support of Powell? You ask people to provide reasons for their views and yet you provide none. None that are factual, that is.

Again, to counter your previous claims in this thread:

1. Powell didn't resign from the Bush Administration in protest: according to his own biography written with his cooperation, his resignation was requested by the White House after the Nov 2004 election. The "resignation" story released in Nov 2004 was a face saving fiction agreed upon by both Powell and the Administration. But Powell is an honorable man.

2. Powell within a year and a half went from asserting that Saddam had no WMD programs, posed no threat to his neighbors or the US, to having a State Dept project for rebuilding Iraq after Saddam's overthrow (while the Administration claimed it had no plans for Iraq) and making the case for war (WMD's) to Congress, in spite of various intel/scientific assessments (including his own State Dept's) that the Administration's WMD claims were bogus. He wasn't uninformed, he wasn't deprived of info as to the true nature of Iraq's WMD's. He knew the Bush Administration intended to invade Iraq and supported and faciliated it with his briefings to Congress, his presentation to the UN, and his other public statements and appearances. But Powell is an honorable man.

Strange how for some Powell is teflon coated. He's been around and involved in Repub dirty work for decades but seemingly never manages to get publically splattered while the people he works for, and whose bidding he did, are reviled. Weinberger gets indicted for his role in Iran Contra; Powell's his special aide but fortunately Weinberger's pardon prevents further investigation and info from going public, including Powell's involvement, knowledge of Iran Contra and whether he lied to Congress. Powell's a great PR image guy. Cheney comes off like the creepy lying crook he is. But Powell presents himself as reasonable and personable and credible....who better to rely on to sell a war based on lies to Congress and the American people? And then he distances himself from it as if he were a mere innocent bystander. And some people evidently buy it, facts to the contrary.

Poor Colin, he just happens to be nearby when there's Repub dirty work to be done and he does it. But Powell is an honorable man....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Did I say I belong to his fan club, NO, did I apologize for him, NO
I posted a FUCKING POLL, AND YOU ASSUME JUST TO MAKE YOURSELF APPEAR INTELLIGENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. But...but...in post #3 you said Powell was a "hero!"
And in post 21, you weren't at all suggesting that Powell simply was given erroneous WMD info and blamelessly, unknowingly promulgated it? No one could possibly infer that from your response to the poster who said he lied about WMD?

I responded directly to those posts with factual information that refuted them. I didn't simply "assume" anything from your poll.

OK, you're not a fan or apologist for Powell. He's just a hero in your book. Or so you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #82
102. When a Republican ends up on a Democratic ticket, it stops being the Democratic party
How hard is that to understand? I wouldn't be leaving the Democratic party, the Democratic party would be leaving me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
83. Uh, NO, because he's a FUCKING WAR CRIMINAL WHO HELPED LIE US INTO WAR?
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 08:36 PM by Zhade
Wow. I can't believe any decent person would support that criminal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
87. Are you NUTS!
The 'good soldier' who covered up My Lai!
The 'good soldier" who knew damn well that he was lying at the UN, who didn't regign when he should have if there was any integrity in his little finger!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. It is a legitimate question, and no I'm not nuts
Christ on a popsicle stick, stupider questions have been asked on DU about Britney's crotch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
88. Answer: NO ... Reason: HE'S A FUCKING REPUBLICAN!
That takes care of it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
92. He's a repug (albeit a nice one), and this is still Amerikkka
no offense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
93. are you fucking kidding me?!
this shit is getting absolutely ridiculous. Since when did people decide it was cool to start fucking pushing Bush cabinet war criminals as VP choices when there are plenty of DEMOCRATS to choose from?! :grr:

It's the usual suspects trolling this shit all over DU. We see you, and we're paying attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
94.  I really dislike this guy. He was the ONLY repub to fool me into thinking he cared.
He's a liar and cheat like the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
95. What a sickening idea....Bush made Powell his "bitch" and you want us to make him vp?
Oh hell no. No way. no time. That filth needs to retire now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #95
99. (sigh) I ASKED a poll question dumbass, I am not running for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. Since you are calling people names
I'd like to point out that you are a liar. Your first posting after the OP said:
He's a hero in my book.

So your promotional objectives are clear. You did not just ask a question. You asked a question and then used that to promote a Republican war criminal and liar on a Democratic website, you promote this Bushie over and above the large field of quailfied Democrats.

Calling people names for not accepting your love of Powell on DU? Takes some nerve and some serious lack of reason, insight and basic intelligence. Dumbass indeed. You can not even stand behind your own statements. Colin Powell, liar and Bushie, is a hero in your book who should be vice President. You said it. You posted it. You quaver and lash out when called on it, but you said it,you posted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #99
119. (sigh) Apparently, fuckhead, the vast majority of DUers agree with me, not you on Colon Powell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
96. No no no no no no no and no! He had his chance to put his country before his party at the UN
did not, he enabled the war.

Hell no to Colin Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
98. No, he is not even remotely under consideration.
That alone makes all questions of debating the pros and cons completely pointless.

This would be just as silly as asking if we support Johnny Depp or RFK jr. for Vice President. Colin Powell is no more under consideration and it is no more likely that he will be the Vice Presidential nominee than either of them. In fact it is no more likely that Colin Powell, Johnny Depp or RFK Jr. will be the Vice Presidential nominee than I will be.

Why not debate something more relevant and more possible like, "should the color of U.S. dollar bills be changed to fluorescent orange?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
100. Are we out of Qualified DEMOCRATS?
:wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
101. Voted 'no.'
Powell's address to the United Nations in support of Dubya's assertion that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, including wpms in mobile labs, was unconscionable, IMO.

Either he is not bright enough to examine the nature of evidence in support of the claim or he knew it was a lie and gave the presentation anyway.

Not an attractive performance in public service or global husbandry. Shame on him.

We have a list of excellent Democrats a mile long who can help Obama get elected and then help him govern. We'll take Powell's endorsement if it comes but we don't need him otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
103. No. He's a Republican, which means that ticket loses my vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
106. There are thousands of Democratic politicians who could be better VPs.
Than that Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
108. Almost as many people think I'm Bramaged as want him as VP
Oh well, didn't hurt to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
110. just as soon as he turns up those mobile weapon labs then I am ok with him
Still waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
111. NO, unless he switches parties.
A repub is a repub. Period. Yes, I'm partisan. Why else would I be on this site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. Even then - NO with this one
He helped start this war. I don't care if he was just 'doing his job'. If he knew what he was doing was wrong he should have resigned and spoke out.

Instead thousands of our soldiers and even more Iraqi Civilians are dead because of those lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
112. Military VP should be Wes Clark; Powell's been a Bush family enabler for decades now...
Powell played no small part in getting the U.S. into Iraq. In the run-up to that invasion, Powell was showing slides of satellite photos that (allegedly) depicted this and that.

If there's any interest on the part of the Obama camp to make their VP candidate a person with a strong military background, look no further than Wes Clark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
113. THIS IS A BULLSHIT POOL - WE SHOULD NOT BE ADVOCATING REPUKE VPS
Especially ones who carried the Bush lies to the UN to help get the Iraq war.

Oh he's qualified? Bullshit my ass!


He isn't even qualified to shine Obama's shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
116. Far too cowardly. No way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
118. Don't forget guyz, Gore did choose Lieberman as his VP. - meaning
that it wouldn't be the first time a mistake was made, but with Obama I feel it there's no room for this sort of bad judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. Yes, but back then Lieberman wasn't an Independent. He would never make the ticket now. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #124
126. Lieberman supported NOT recounting Dade county (a Democratic Fl. County in 2000)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #126
127. Ah, but he was already on the ticket at that time, no? He showed his true colors even then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #118
125. LIEBERMAN WAS A DEMOCRAT AND THERE WAS NO WAR IN IRAQ
Meaning that Lieberman wasn't quite the douchebag he is today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
120. One of the architects of Iraq? Fuck, no.
He's the kind of mess I want Obama to clean up. I sure as hell don't want to hand him the keys to Cheney's man-sized safe.

We should be indicting Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
121. Mai Lai? Iraq? Unethical liar!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
123. NO REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TICKET - CAPICHE? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #123
128. Totally agree. Powell chose to serve Bush/Cheney instead of his country.
He's out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC