Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biased AP story (quoting Rush Limbaugh!) asks if media is "playing fair" in campaign coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:12 AM
Original message
Biased AP story (quoting Rush Limbaugh!) asks if media is "playing fair" in campaign coverage
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iIHbNjxgyh98CZcVL1vYRM6JBVNQD9220LG85

Is media playing fair in campaign coverage?
By DAVID BAUDER

-snip-

For each of the weeks between June 9 and July 13, Obama had a much more significant media presence. The Project for Excellence in Journalism evaluates more than 300 political stories each week in newspapers, magazines and television to measure whether each candidate is talked about in more than 25 percent of the stories.

Every week, Obama played an important role in more than two-thirds of the stories. For July 7-13, for example, Obama was a significant presence in 77 percent of the stories while McCain was in 48 percent, the PEJ said.

Sure, there are some weeks Obama's going to make more news, said Tom Rosenstiel, the project's director.

But every week?

"No matter how understandable it is given the newness of the candidate and the historical nature of Obama's candidacy, in the end it's probably not fair to McCain," he said.

-snip-



More at the link, much more interesting stuff than I can quote.

This is more AP bias, some of their most blatant editorializing-as-news so far, and now they're taking aim at other news organizations.

I'm checking PEJ's website

http://journalism.org/

and don't see any new article on the media supposedly not playing fair, so it looks as though Bauder contacted PEJ's director and pushed him until they got one comment that the greater number of stories on Obama is "probably not fair to McCain."

This AP story left out all mention of PEJ's article on how "Obama Rumors Get More Press Coverage" -- a situation where the greater number of stories isn't in Obama's favor.

Bauder quotes not only Rush Limbaugh (yes, just the "authority" to turn to for discussing whether the media is fair) but Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., with his comment about Obama's trip being just a "publicity stunt."

Paragraphs near the end of the AP article dismiss Obama as an "attractive commodity" for the media and suggest that with the "attention gap" supposedly being created, "it could leave the nation electing a president while the media is paying attention to someone else." Translation: McCain is the only real candidate, the one who'll be elected, while the press revels in an "infatuation" with this "attractive commodity" offered by the Democrats.

The final paragraphs have comments from the president of NBC News, saying it's funny this is now an issue when the media has been accused of being too cozy with McCain.

But overall, this is a hit piece, incredibly biased against Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're also biased for Britney Spears over Eric Clapton...

Yes, the media is terribly biased... They *really* show it in their music coverage.

A search request in the Associated Press archives for "Britney Spears" returns 1580 hits.

A search request in those same archives for "Eric Clapton" returns only 2 hits.

The AP is clearly saying that Britney Spears is 790 times better of a musician than Eric Clapton.

Those pop-leaning, musically biased scumbags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. CBS News ran the exact same story. I smell an RNC talking points memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting! Was about to post this same article, with essentially your same analysis,
....though yours is a paragraph or two more thorough than what I'd contemplated, since I'm still pissed about what an obvious con job the piece is.

Basically, Repubbies whining about how little there is worth covering, McCain-wise, especially this week.

So these snarky little hatchet jobs are the best they can do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wonder what Olbermann could say about this?
I haven't been terribly fond of KO in recent months because of his Clinton-bashing, but I would like to see him do a special commentary on the bias in the AP's complaint about bias. Or maybe he could just name them "worst people in the world."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I also had to work to forgive Olbermann for his Clinton-bashing...

What helped me get over it was the realization that his program only lasts an hour, so naturally he was forced to gloss over a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's no such thing as fair!
Amazing how the gop is so quick to utter that phrase when some little person's down on his luck. But let one conservative get his undies in a bunch they're quick as hell to start whining about fairness. They just love to play the victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I agree. They need to devote more time to McCain.
They need to cover his gaffs and flip-flops, and expose his abysmal stupidity for the whole world to see.

There are PLENTY of good stories they can cover about McCain. They just don't want the public to see who McCain really is, so they keep him OUT of the limelight in order to protect him from himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. The New York Times started this ridiculous story early last week.
All of the articles focus on the number of minutes of exposure the candidates got.

NONE of the articles talk about the tenor of the coverage. How many months of coverage has the media spent on Obama's former pastor? And what miniscule percentage of the coverage on John McCain doesn't focus on the story that he's a "straight-talkin' America lovin' maverick"?

This is just more bullshit piled on top of bullshit from the fucking shitty American piece of crap media. The whole lot of them should be rounded up and sent to Guantanamo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is the narrative McCain is trying to push
And he's very adept at handling the press and getting his way. Last week, after McCain's joke about shipping cigarettes to Iran to give them cancer, I looked closely at the video. Who was there? Karen Tumulty of Time, laughing heartily as she wrote on her note pad. Just like Bush's WMD (are they under here?) jokes. They get the guffaws from the press corps while we get ridiculous coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Corporate Media Whores and the rethugs have been saying this election is all about Obama
Edited on Mon Jul-21-08 03:13 AM by Cali_Democrat
and not about McCain. They say McCain is a known quantity and Obama is an unknown.

They have been trying to put the spotlight on Obama and paint him as "exotic."

When they see that it's failing they say that there is bias in favor of Obama because all the media stories are about him even though the majority are negative.

The media tends to show "concern" for Obama and McCain gets a free ride. Just imagine if Obama had made some of the gaffes McCain has recently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC