Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP and Republicans whine about not getting fair coverage!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:45 AM
Original message
AP and Republicans whine about not getting fair coverage!!
"Grumpy McGoo doesn't get the same coverage for his sleepy town halls, it's not fair! The liberal media!"

Too bad Fox talks about Obama A LOT more than McCain too, just like the AP, just like ABC News.. all conservative outlets.

Obama has to watch it though...those conservative news outlets are itching to make this election a referendum on Obama instead of Bush and are hoping to get a gaffe or make a phony controversy.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080720/ap_en_tv/ap_on_tv_obama_s_trip


Television news' royalty will fly in to meet Barack Obama during this week's overseas trip: CBS chief anchor Katie Couric in Jordan on Tuesday, ABC's Charles Gibson in Israel on Wednesday and NBC's Brian Williams in Germany on Thursday.

The anchor blessing defines the trip as a Major Event and — much like a "Saturday Night Live" skit in February that depicted a press corps fawning over Obama — raises anew the issue of fairness in campaign coverage.

The news media have devoted significantly more attention to the Democrat since Hillary Rodham Clinton suspended her campaign and left a two-person contest for the presidency between Obama and Republican John McCain, according to research conducted by the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

News executives say there are reasons for the disparity, such as the continuing story about whether Clinton's and Obama's supporters can reconcile. They even partly blame McCain. By criticizing Obama for a lack of foreign policy experience, McCain raised the stakes for Obama's trip, "especially if he winds up going into two war zones," said Paul Friedman, senior vice president of CBS News.

Obama has traveled to Afghanistan and is expected to go to Iraq. He is also scheduled to visit Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England. Network anchors stayed home during McCain's recent foreign excursions.

"The question really needs to be posed: Is this type of coverage fair?" said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va. "This is nothing but a political stunt."

Talk show host Rush Limbaugh said none of this should be a surprise.

"My prediction is that the coverage of Obama on this trip will be oriented toward countering the notion he has no idea what he is talking about on foreign policy and defense issues and instead will prop him up as a qualified statesman," Limbaugh told The Associated Press. "McCain, on the other hand, is a known quantity on these issues and his position does not excite nor fit the mainstream media's narrative on Iraq and Afghanistan, so they simply ignore it and him."

Along with newsworthiness, the question of fairness was discussed within ABC News before it was agreed Gibson would travel, said Jon Banner, executive producer of "World News." Also, if one network anchor decides to hit the road for a big event, chances are the others will follow.

"We have already been in discussions with the McCain campaign to try to afford them the same or a similar opportunity," Banner said. "We have gone to great lengths to be fair and provide equal time to both campaigns."

Shortly after Obama clinched the Democratic nomination, Gibson flew to Miami for a McCain interview, he said.

For each of the weeks between June 9 and July 13, Obama had a much more significant media presence. The Project for Excellence in Journalism evaluates more than 300 political stories each week in newspapers, magazines and television to measure whether each candidate is talked about in more than 25 percent of the stories.

Every week, Obama played an important role in more than two-thirds of the stories. For July 7-13, for example, Obama was a significant presence in 77 percent of the stories, while McCain was in 48 percent, the PEJ said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Then look for another AP hit-piece against Obama in the next few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. People are finding its taste for the Truth, the Promise, the Optimism that is Obama
Edited on Mon Jul-21-08 01:55 AM by opihimoimoi
McCain and the Pubs are outdated and tired...its the same old thing...

Lie Cheat Steal to get elected then...vote self interest and not for the WHOLE...

People sense the Sincerity, the Hope, the Sharing/Caring Personality that many yearn for in our Leaders.....

McLame is Old Hat

Obama is new approaches and new Vision....in Leadership...Brains is better than Beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fair coverage would be apocalyptic.
Actual fair coverage would quickly result in blatant violence against, and old fashioned tarring and feathering of many republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey! Mc Same is elderly like me, so I kinda like him!
Let's all bust out of the nursing homes tomorrow at 1 PM!
I'll be the old woman, wearing the homemade t-shirt that says:

"John McCain called his wife a cunt".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. 'Scuse me, please, but McLame is boring. And stupid. And embarrassing to himself.
So more coverage would have damaged his campaign anyway.

So fuck off, mclame lovers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They need to get more McSame coverage
His reversals, lies, insane rantings, threats, gaffes, and "blue screens" should be will documented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Way more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. The funniest thing about this...
well there's two things funny. First is the media is crying about its own coverage. Welcome to bizzaro world.

And second if they gave ,csame the same amount of coverage they gave obama this race would be over. They purposely ducked covering mcsame last week as much as they can as he was one huge gaffe after another. Pretty much a normal week for him but they now damn well if they cover it this thing is over.

Should be a fun few months. Constant attempts to tear obama down followed by a constant stream of whining about all the coverage he gets. And the funniest thing is we will be bitching about their coverage right along with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC