Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Obama Returns, He Needs One on Each Arm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:20 AM
Original message
When Obama Returns, He Needs One on Each Arm
Suggestion to the Obama campaign to avoid a trap McCain is trying to pull on Obama.

When he returns from this trip, he needs to have a sit-down, Q & A press conference (shirtsleeves rolled up, collar open) with Hagel and Reed sitting next to him. It not only gives depth but, more importantly, it gives McCain a target he can't hit.

Reportedly, McCain wants to force Obama to admit that the surge is a huge success, and, thus McCain was correct and had to force Obama to go to the region to figure it out because Obama's such "a inexperienced child", blah, blah. Obama maintains that the surge was only one part of it--the other two being the Iraqi forces and "peace" between waring religious factions (which is probably 90% of it anyway!). If Hagel and Reed say the same, then once again McCain is out in La-La Land all by himself. This also deflects the vampires from screeching that Obama is "playing president"---he would be just one of three guys who went, looked, listened and made intelligent observations. In a word--DO NOT put Obama out there by himself or the winger media whores are going to do McCain's bidding and make these labels stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently he already said the surge wasn't working
just a few minutes ago in his live press conference. I didn't see it, but there's a thread about it in this forum. Good suggestions though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sense - I just read that
Yeeees! Just saw it on the thread about his press conference. As usual, the goddamn press ignored Reed and Hagel and want to just focus on him so they can do the "aren't you trying to play president" or "admit, you little bastard, that McCain was right about the surge"!! That's why I'd like to see them all sitting side by side and tossing questions around so the media can't ignore the other two bolstering Obama's obserations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. He brought up the paid for Sunni stand down and the Shi'ite cease fire
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 10:13 AM by crankychatter
as primary co-contributing factors, possibly more significant than the "surge" itself

then he addressed solutions to the Bush fuck-ups, Sunni amnesty and employment issues, incorporation into the power base of the Central Government, sharing the windfall from increased oil prices to the various provinces, for economic development... all that

It's been a source of frustration for me to watch our elected Dems avoid more specific criticism of Bush's management and their responsibility to informing the public and their constituents

All the focus has been "the surge," and "is it working," without any reference to the complexities on the ground

Gobama

edited to add: He also mentioned the Shi'ah ethnic cleansing in the city of Baghdad... man they NEVER talk about it.

I love that guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. cranky - I agree
Our Dems could do a better job of dispensing info - but, alas the goddamn media wouldn't cover it. When you watch something like the BBC news, what a contrast in information dispensing. They would NEVER handle anything as serious as this war with nothing but reiterating talking points, and "Hollywood" type sensational headlines. They actually dig and report. I learned more from them in one broadcast than the whole 5 years of spew coming from this propaganda machine called "American journalism". Somebody should invade and liberate US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC