Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should every candidate for the nomination open their records?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:32 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should every candidate for the nomination open their records?
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 12:34 PM by Padraig18
For purposes of this question, 'records' covers all constituent correspondence, intra-office memos, 'work product' from staff meetings and the like, NOT merely matters that are 'recorded' puiblicly in the Congressional Record, it's state or local equivalent.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just as I suspected.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. One candidate should open all his records, and his Daddy's too
And that candidate would be a certain simian son of a bitch named Bush Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Well, since you put it THAT way, no."
9-8 vs. 'Yes, unconditionally.' :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it is an individual and not a "public person" and it is "personal
correspondence" the name would be "blacked out." This is truely no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're quite sure about that?
I'd like to see reference to the pertinent VT law that says that that would in fact occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Eveneing shift kick
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC