Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Skipping the trip to the hospital was boneheaded screw-up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:07 PM
Original message
Skipping the trip to the hospital was boneheaded screw-up.
Until this blunder the talking head shows would have been all good for the campaign. Now the story is that Obama refused to visit troops because he couldn't take his camera crews. How this was going to be spun was easy to predict but the Obama campaign blundered right into it. That tremendous speech and reception yesterday has become the thing he was doing before he snubbed our fighting heroes.

Smooth move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You're just digging yourself into a hole.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. I've got a suggestion for everyone that responds to a possible troll
I don't know if the person you responded to was a troll. But it would be nice for those of us that come across deleted (scrubbed) messages that responders would also include the number of postings shown for that person at the bottom of their response. It would give us an idea as to whether the poster might possibly be a troll or a some sort of plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. You mean show their post count?
Not sure that would signify. Recent banned trolls include people with posts counts in the tens of thousands. Over 100,000 in one case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The OP posted the deleted reply. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I think that would possibly be a violation of DU rules.
Do not publicly accuse another member of this message board of being a disruptor, conservative, Republican, FReeper, or troll, or do not otherwise imply they are not welcome on Democratic Underground. If you think someone is a disruptor, click the "Alert" link below their post to let the moderators know.

Do not draw negative attention to the fact that someone is new, has a low post count, or recently became a member of Democratic Underground. Do not insinuate that because someone is new, they are a troll or disruptor.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules_detailed.html

Just alert on any posts that you suspect and let the admins and mods make the call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Listen Genius...
Edited on Fri Jul-25-08 04:21 PM by bunnies
He was on that leg of the trip using campaign finances. THAT was the problem. What part of it dont you get?

editing because clearly youre confused: Department of Defense rules prohibit political campaigning on military bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. BTW, not just ANYBODY is allowed on military installations. I know, I lived
on quite a few. So, you're talking out of your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF are you talking about.. the Pentagon told him he couldn't go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice try.
Debunked repeatedly.

And for your next act...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Your concern overwhelms me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. EPIC FAIL. Look around DU before you start spewing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Um, except the Pentagon has confirmed the Obama campaign's account of the situation.
That they informed the campaign that this would be viewed as a campaign event, which the campaign wanted to avoid. It wasn't only the press that couldn't accompany him, none of his campaign staff would have been allowed either.

Oh, and FYI, he called injured soldiers at Landstuhl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Speaking of bonehead screw ups...
You just fucked up. Big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. i guess you didn't hear Donna Brazille on this,
she was on cnn a few minutes ago.
and said this was nothing but bluster on the mccain campaign's part and explained that there are certain protocols and rules to follow whether it's a congressional visit or a campaing one, etc etc., and there is nothing the Obama camp did that was wrong, so shut the fuck up about it already.

well, she didn't add the last part but one day she will, she will. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. You really screwed up in your OP. Try reading the facts first.
Smooth move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think the opposite is true- it would have appeared exploitative
and personally, had I been an injured soldier, that's EXACTLY how I'd feel. Politically exploited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama did the right thing and made the right move
They would have skewered him for using wounded vets for a campaign trip. Not only was it a smooth move it was the right move. The pentagon verified that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why would you write this?
It has been made clear that the pentagon wouldn't allow the visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wrong on too many levels.
Haven't heard a word about it on teevee.

Have read plenty of posts here debunking it.

It's not even close to a gaff, and to have going would have been the blunder. He phoned them instead.

No idea why anyone would deliberately, actually, type out the subject line and copy in your post without having a second thought like, "what will this accomplish?".

Or, maybe you had some purpose in mind.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Try paying attention.
The Pentagon told him not to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. You lose. Obama did what was appropriate under the circumstances--
Edited on Fri Jul-25-08 04:26 PM by wienerdoggie
and also was correct in following the rules. And, he gets credit for WANTING and PLANNING to go, in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. care to comment on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. The wingers in the Pentagon & State Dept wouldn't allow him to go
The McCain campaign is being supervised by the WH. They are inviolation of the Hatch Act for the 1000th time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Is this a boneheaded thread? Or is it a blundered thread?
I get confused sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. don't you have a bridge to be attending to? I think there may be some Billy goats headed that way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. I assume by now you've gotten the correct info on this.
Thanks for your concern, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. You should have stuck with your earlier analysis of
the Obama campaign and the Daily Brainwashing from MediaCorp:

"Yet if Obama happens to ba in the same town as someone who says some really strange stuff, Obama is forced to apologize for it.

Keep swinging Barack."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. This doesn't come off like your OP is trying to be very constructive
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. IMHO it was a big misunderstanding between campaign & Pentagon
Edited on Fri Jul-25-08 04:37 PM by RamboLiberal
Sen. Barack Obama's campaign staff and the Pentagon are putting forth different versions of what happened before Obama cancelled a planned Friday morning visit to the Ramstein air base in Germany.

The Obama campaign has suggested the Pentagon interfered with its decision to visit U.S. troops at the Ramstein and Landstuhl U.S. military bases in Germany -- something the Pentagon denied Friday.

-----

But on Wednesday, Gibbs said, Gration received new information from the Pentagon, saying that this visit would be viewed as a campaign stop.

He said the Pentagon said Obama could visit wounded troops from Illinois in his capacity as a senator, but that was it. Gration dealt with the legislative affairs office within the office of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.

"He could go as a United States senator, but it was pretty clear from the guidance that we received from the Pentagon that the trip would be viewed as a campaign stop," Gibbs told reporters Friday. "Given the information that we had received, Senator Obama made the decision that we were not gonna have wounded men and women become involved in a campaign event or what would be perceived as a campaign event."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5449455&page=1

BERLIN,GERMANY) UPDATE, 1:30pm ET Barack Obama spent the morning working in his room at Berlin's Adelon Hotel after the campaign canceled a planned visit to Ramstein Airbase and Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. Late last night, the campaign canceled the planned troop visit because they said they did not want to politicize the meeting.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell told CBS News today, "The senator is more than welcome to visit any military facility, he always has been and always will be, as a senator."

"The Pentagon was willing to accomodate the fact they were on a campaign trip," Morrell added, saying that the Pentagon would have kept the campaign staff and traveling press outside while Obama was inside visiting the troops.

"It was their decision to cancel the visit," Morrell said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/07/25/politics/fromtheroad/entry4292302.shtml

But the wingnuts are going to run with it. Obama camp needs to get out there and explain it was a big misunderstanding and let someone do a huge mea culpa.

Perhaps Obama needs to ditch the cameras and quietly fly back with a small press contigent and visit the hospital before flying back to U.S.

Yeah, IMHO a rare misstep by campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. Do try to do SOME research
for example: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6540740&mesg_id=6540740

McCaint agrees that you caint go to military bases while on the stump. Unless of course he is attacking Obama, and then you can.

Who's the bonehead now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thank you for your concern.
I hope you don't lose sleep over the boneheaded screw-up. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Being such a major supporter of Obama that you are, your concern is touching and surely heartfelt.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. who gives a fuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. Ummm, styersc ?
By now you've realized that you bought into the right wing spin. Want to apologize and make it better?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
37. this is by far the single most best post i have ever seen on DU...
well...if the OP can post some inane and, beyond that, rw bullshit, i can, too...can't i?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. It still doesn't top Seabiscuit's post about Indiana being a blowout for HC with 2% in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm curious. Is the combination of desperation and lameness physically painful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC