Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Want Obama to win? Hold the media accountable. Now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:33 PM
Original message
Want Obama to win? Hold the media accountable. Now.
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 01:34 PM by AZBlue
From MoveOn:

This week, two right-wing books came out about Barack Obama. One is written by Jerome Corsi, co-author of Unfit For Command—the 2004 book that launched the "Swift Boat" smear. The other is published by a right-wing publisher who describes the book's "goal" as the same as Unfit for Command—to spur negative coverage of the Democratic nominee and tarnish his image.1

Already, the authors are making the rounds on TV shows. And already, media watchdog group Media Matters has found pages and pages of factual inaccuracies in these books. But just like in 2004, if the media parrot baseless right-wing smears over and over again, it won't matter whether the books are true—the damage will be done.

Can you contact one of the major news networks today? Tell them The Case Against Barack Obama and Obama Nation are not legitimate journalism—they're a smear campaign based on falsehoods. Authors whose sole goal is to smear Barack Obama should not be given on-air coverage (and if the authors are already booked, their inaccuracies must be exposed).

You can find email information for one of the major networks http://www.moveon.org/contact_tool/?p_id=105&id=13406-7646285-KPQEyix&t=3">here on our website.


Other MoveOn members will get contact information for other networks, so together we can cover everyone. The more polite and thoughtful our emails are, the more effective they will be.

There are already some positive signs that our message is getting through. In an interview with one of the right-wing authors, MSNBC's Contessa Brewer said a Media Matters report found "some eight, nine, ten pages of factual errors," and asked, "f they are going through, and they are finding all of these factual errors in your book, why should we give you the credibility?"2

We need to keep the pressure on so everyone at the major news networks understands that the public wants them—needs them—to play that strong watchdog role. Here is a sampling of the many errors found by Media Matters in the two books:

Sampling from The Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi—co-author of Unfit for Command:
  • Troops in Afghanistan: To paint Obama as weak on security, Corsi claims Obama supports "de-escalating" troops from Afghanistan. In fact, while Obama does support ending the war in Iraq, Obama has been calling for an increase of U.S. troops in Afghanistan since at least 2006.3 This is a policy John McCain long opposed before recently agreeing with Obama.4
  • Killing newborn babies: Discussing his book on FOX, Corsi claimed, "Even if a child was born, said the woman still had the right to kill the child in an abortion." He repeated this claim on numerous Sean Hannity shows. This claim is blatantly ridiculous. No politician, Obama included, holds that position. Corsi was referring to a fabricated claim that choice opponents made about a piece of legislation in the Illinois Senate.5
  • Obama's sister: Corsi casts doubt on Obama's description of his past by saying Obama's autobiography "devotes the entire second chapter...to his time in Indonesia, but remarkably, he makes no reference to Maya's birth." In fact, in the chapter discussing his time in Indonesia, Obama specifically writes about "the birth of my sister, Maya."6
  • Obama's campaign blogger: Corsi writes of Obama campaign blogger Sam Graham-Felsen, "After leaving Harvard, Graham-Felsen published an article in an avowedly socialist magazine." In fact, the article was published in well-respected progressive magazine The Nation. It was later reprinted by the Socialist Viewpoint—and CBSNews.com! The link Corsi uses as a citation clearly says that the article was reprinted from another publication.7

Sampling from The Case Against Barack Obama, by David Freddoso:
  • Fighting terrorists in Pakistan: To diminish Obama's stance against terrorism, Freddoso claims that it was only a "slip of the tongue" when Obama said in a major foreign policy speech that America must be able to go after Bin Laden, even if Pakistan wouldn't. In fact, Obama's prepared remarks and the excerpts that Obama's campaign emailed to reporters prior to the actual speech included this line: "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."8
  • Meeting with foreign leaders: Freddoso claims that Sen. Joe Biden, who is highly respected on foreign policy, was "against Obama" when it came to meeting with foreign leaders. In fact, in the ABC interview cited by Freddoso, Biden was agree'ing with Obama's position.9
  • Ethics reform: Freddoso cites a book by a Chicago journalist to characterize ethics legislation Obama passed in Illinois as "relatively harmless" and to claim the bill merely made Obama "look like a reformer." In fact, the Chicago journalist said pushing the bill "was a tough assignment for a new lawmaker, since he was essentially sponsoring legislation that would strip away long-held privileges and perks from his colleagues," and that the bill "essentially lifted Illinois, a state with a deep history of illicit, pay-to-play politics, into the modern world when it came to ethics restrictions."10

Plenty of other factual inaccuracies are posted on MediaMatters.org — and more come out by the day. We need to make sure news organizations don't legitimize right-wing smears.

Can you contact one of the major news networks today? Tell them The Case Against Barack Obama and Obama Nation are not legitimate journalism—they're a smear campaign based on falsehoods. Authors whose sole goal is to smear Barack Obama should not be given on-air coverage (and if the authors are already booked, their inaccuracies must be exposed).

You can find email information for one of the major networks http://www.moveon.org/contact_tool/?p_id=105&id=13406-7646285-KPQEyix&t=3">here on our website.


Thanks for all you do to hold the media accountable.

–Adam G., Justin, Anna, Noah, and the rest of the team


Sources:
1. "First Obama attack book in the works," Politico, June 23, 2008
2. "Citing Media Matters report on Obama Nation falsehoods, MSNBC's Brewer asked Corsi: '(W)hy should we give you the credibility?'" Media Matters, August 5, 2008
3. "Unfit for Publication: Corsi's The Obama Nation filled with falsehoods," Media Matters, August 4, 2008
4. "Did Obama Force McCain To Flip-Flop On Afghanistan?" Huffington Post, July 15, 2008
5. "On three Hannity programs, Corsi offered another falsehood: Obama supports abortion '(a)fter a child's born,'" Media Matters, August 2, 2008
6. "Unfit for Publication: Corsi's The Obama Nation filled with falsehoods," Media Matters, August 4, 2008
7. Ibid.
8. "Citations in Freddoso's anti-Obama book rife with misinformation," Media Matters, August 5, 2008
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Too important to not kick - again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. an hour and THREE responses????? this is the MOST important
aspect of the entire campaign

at least make the effort to contact the major news hoors

I'm not watching this cable crap anymore, so I'll rely on what I see here. one of the reasons is that I saw Fredoso THREE times in three hours yesterday morning....once on CNN and twice on MSNBC

let's GO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:46 PM
Original message
It is disappointing that many would rather fight over the Clintons or VP choices.
I'd rather focus on getting Obama in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. amen....what a joke
they can turn off the computer and jerk it in the shower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. The corporate media is OUT OF CONTROL
We have the tools to create our own media on the web and need to keep hammering back. The stooges on your TV and radio will continue to do what they do for their corporate masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think we need to respond to the M$M too.
The internet is a vital tool, but not one that everyone has access to or uses for their news source. After all, you have to look for news online and many in this country aren't that proactive. They only get their news between songs on the radio or in commercial breaks during "Survivor." We need to stay on top of the corrupt media and call them out when they lie, even by omission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's like stopping a flood, but it's absolutely necessary to try. they don't
listen, and when they do, they denigrate the very idea that they could possibly have done anything beyond the pale, ala Milbank.

btw, I just deleted TWENTY EIGHT threads from the first page of this forum, dealing either with VP candidates or Hillary

twenty eight

can't wait to see how many pop up on the newly arranged one.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. There's probably nothing else to read in GDP now, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. They're coming off as racists, always knocking Obama the way they do.
It is no longer subjective or covert either.
It's right out in the open.

McCain is a doddering, stuttering old fuck, who can't even read prepared statements, like the one about 4 dollar a gas at the Sturgis biker rally. He looked like Homer's dad, stuttering and repeating his words, and stammering trying to spit out his smart-ass line about the cost of gas.

But, Obama, well, hell, he's not tested.
He's not experienced.
He's got a lot to learn in the White House!
He's qualified, according to the Constitution - geezus that was the stupidest fucking answer Bubba could have ever given!!!!

And that's from our side!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yes, they will.
I've been trying to alert people to this fact for years, but so far it's done very little good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yep
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you so much for this.
We need to focus here and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Want Obama to win? - Keep an eye on Diebold machines...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes, but keeping the media in line now will make it that much harder to cheat in Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. kkkkkkkk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm kicking this myself
Because I think it's important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. The parroting and aiding the smear groups
is one reason why I don't watch any cable news (and don't go to their sites) since the 2004 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Want Obama to win? Hold the media accountable. Now.
One word.... RATINGS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's a good word! And I have another good one:
advertisers!

Let's get them where they live: the bank account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC