Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

While Excoriating Edwards For Cheating, FOX News Overlooks McCain’s Cheating Past

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 02:16 AM
Original message
While Excoriating Edwards For Cheating, FOX News Overlooks McCain’s Cheating Past
Hannity & Colmes devoted its entire program last night (8/8/08) to John Edwards’ affair, probably with the same kind of relish that has not been seen since the Monica Lewinsky days. Certainly there was nothing similar in the coverage of the sex scandals of Republicans Larry Craig, David Vitter or Vito Fosella. In fact, don't recall any coverage of either Fosella or Vitter. Sean Hannity waxed sanctimoniously about Edwards, “It’s a character issue... If you cheat on your wife, are you gonna be honest with your country?” Yet neither he nor anyone else questioned whether John McCain could be honest with his country, given his history of cheating on his first wife after she had been gravely injured. And Hannity helped fundraise for another adulterating presidential candidate, Rudy Giuliani. With video.

The video below contains excerpts from a three-part panel discussion that included two Republicans, one of the authors of the National Enquirer article and Kirsten Powers as the lone Democrat.

The video begins with a segment from Part 2, in which Hannity dripped with showy admiration for Elizabeth Edwards. But no sooner had he finished his display of sensitivity than he began to criticize her and directly contravene her request that the public avoid voyeurism. Hannity said, “(Elizabeth Edwards) did take a shot at the Enquirer... She’s gotta know he’s running for president. She’s gotta know he’s a contender for vice president or was. So I honestly applaud the Enquirer.” As opposed to dishonestly applauding Elizabeth Edwards? If you know Hannity, you have to wonder.

Powers made a good point, which was to question whether or not the affair is really germane to Edwards’ political life. When Hannity expressed doubt, Powers cited other presidential cheaters: FDR and JFK. Funny how she did not mention McCain. As Cenk, of Young Turks, notes, Edwards' adultery is very similar to McCain's.

http://www.newshounds.us/2008/08/09/while_excoriating_edwards_for_cheating_fox_news_overlooks_mccains_cheating_past.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. How true, that...sickening isn't it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. How about Rudi 9/11
and his three wives. He was far worse than Edwards or Clinton. Took his mistress to Gracie Mansion while his wife and kids still lived there., used taxpayer money to visit his mistress in the Hamptons etc, etc. A total sleaze who never apologized for his behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Operative word: PAST. So---do you want both stories, or neither?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC