Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton adviser: She never pushed for convention compromise (& will cast her vote for Obama)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:46 PM
Original message
Clinton adviser: She never pushed for convention compromise (& will cast her vote for Obama)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/14/clinton-adviser-she-never-pushed-for-covention-compromise/

Clinton adviser: She never pushed for covention compromise
Posted: 06:05 PM ET

From CNN Senior Political Correspondent Candy Crowley


(CNN) — A source close to Hillary Clinton insists the former presidential contender never pushed Barack Obama’s campaign to allow her supporters to place her name into nomination at the Democratic convention, and approached his team only when her camp grew “worried” over news that rising resentment among her most loyal supporters might lead to chaos in Denver.

The source describes negotiations between the Clinton and Obama campaigns as “collaborative and friendly” since she suspended her presidential run. But the source said recent talks had been focused on the logistics of campaigning for Obama.

“When was over, we sat back and waited to see what would happen,” says the Clinton adviser. “But the voices grew louder about what could come down at the convention, all those kinds of realities started to take place, the reality of what outside groups had in mind, the rumblings.

“More and more groups started to pop up. So we said ‘We are worried we are not going to be able to control it, that it might ruin the convention. What should we do about it?’”

The Obama campaign responded that Clinton’s name should be placed into nomination, says the aide. The source says that Clinton’s own suggestion at a recent fundraiser that putting her name in nomination might be “cathartic” for her supporters was merely a hypothetical response to a question.

The explanation comes amidst some complaints within the party that the Clinton camp has been out of line in its “demands.” Clinton’s supporters have also come under increasing criticism – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told one interviewer this week that the loyalists had been “less than gracious.”

Clinton herself is sending a letter to her superdelegates Thursday relating the decision, and the importance of unifying behind Obama while at the same time honoring everyone who participated.

The Clinton adviser said Clinton will cast her vote for Obama at the convention, and urge her supporters to do the same. Asked how Clinton, a superdelegate, would record her vote for Obama, the adviser said the actual details had yet to be worked out. It is also not clear whether the vote on Clinton’s nomination will be a voice vote or an electronic one, an option that has been raised in discussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have no problem with HRC being nominated. It allows her supporters
to cheer and get it out of their system and it allows her to then go to the podium and call for his nomination to be made by "acclamation." We then unite and go on and beat McCain in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I don't have anything to get out of my system
I'm a loyal Clinton supporter.

As soon as she conceded and threw her support to Obama, I became an Obama supporter.

If HRC's name is placed in nomination, that's fine by me. If it isn't, that's fine as well.

My support for Obama is unconditional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. She must be stopped! She's only voting for Obama to hurt him.
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:50 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
She's the most unpopular person in America. Her vote for Obama will only drag him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's all a trick
DON'T TRUST HER!!! :sarcasm: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes - I'm very pleased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well.....Clinton advisers have been proven to be lying sacks of shit in the past,
what makes me think they've been rehabbed???

** This is NOT a criticism of Hillary, just her Mark Penn Clones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Clinton smearers are silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Relax.
Don't start another fight by arguing over who should and shouldn't be apologetic.

Christ almighty everyone on this board has apologizing to do for one thing or another.

Hillary is going to do the right thing. That is what is important.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Apologies are not necessary
Getting a clue and calming the fuck down, however, is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yes they are, according to Kerry2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Will you cut it out? Do you have to demand an apology on every thread?
You are pushing for a tombstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Very sad that this is being done in this thread and the locked one.
This is time for us to celebrate, not demand apologies.

Once that starts, we'll all be demanding apologies, bringing up all kinds of stuff that is best forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Thank you, JenniferZ. I didn't know that one had been locked. Well deserved.
I find it hard to believe that the drivel went on as long as it did. The OP over there is out of control, demanding apologies all over DU.

Like I said, it looks like a tombstone wish. We don't need that crap.

All the best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Um...lets see....
"The Clinton smearers are silent".....Ok, Which of those words are you reading as "I demand an apology"? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. It relates directly to another post that demanded an apology
and that thread was locked. That's all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. She has been holding fundraisers with these groups.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2461

Watch the video...she wanted them to have a catharsis.

Meanwhile they are all still saying Dean threw the primary.

She has seen their ads smearing Dean, yet she has another fundraiser with them in the Hamptons this month.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. The truth isn't recognized by some even if it is in her own words.
Clinton's incessant drive to redefine what a win is, switching up the agreement on Michigan and Florida, dismissing caucuses, invoking racism and assassination, her kitchen sink strategy, and offering up a plethora of excuses for her loss was aided and abetted by the MSM who were very compliant in pretending the race was tied when it was over by 3/5/08.

Thanks for posting that video, mf. It was truly enlightening, well for those that have their eyes open at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. They changed the rules from delegate count to popular vote...
They lied, and they kept on about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Why don't you trust Obama?
He made the decision.

Are you uncomfortable with his judgement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Yes, because as long as it is said that Dean threw the primaries...
there will be no peace. Yet not a single leader is speaking out for the party chairman. No one. Not one.

No one at DU seems appalled that they are still claiming the primary was unfair.

I trust Obama, I don't trust the others involved.

I tried to point out stuff but my post got locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. "No one at DU seems appalled"?!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. If true then all's forgiven and ...
God bless her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Trust, but verify."
That being said, if this is how it eventually plays out at the DNC, I will take back all of the bad things about her avec plaisir!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. hypothetical my AS----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. The Clinton camp (McAuliffe and Wolfson) were on TV talking about a roll call vote...
... before the primaries were even over. I don't know why they think folks forget these things.

This roll call idea may have come from the Barack camp during the recent negotiations, but it was first brought up by the Clinton campaign during the primaries... and then continually pushed by the bitter-enders after Hillary conceded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Classy move!
Well done, Hillary!

BRAVO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ahhhh, Nancy.................
And to think that I was ecstatic when she became Speaker. Now, I just wish the @$#%&*% woman would STFU!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Why? Do you disagree with this account of things?
Please enlighten me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I don't like her.
The whole campaign she was against Hillary. I don't give a rat's tail end about her personal feelings on the candidates, but as Speaker she should have at least pretended to be neutral. Aside from the fact that she hasn't turned out be a particularly good Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. This source says otherwise
The "source"? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our third quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC