Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Half of Democrats Say Putting Hillary's Name in Nomination Will Help Unify Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:18 AM
Original message
Half of Democrats Say Putting Hillary's Name in Nomination Will Help Unify Party
Edited on Fri Aug-15-08 10:19 AM by Hope And Change

Half of Democrats Say Putting Hillary's Name in Nomination Will Help Unify Party


Friday, August 15, 2008

One third of voters nationwide (33%) agree with Barack Obama that allowing Senator Hillary Clinton’s name to also be placed in nomination at the Democratic National Convention will “help us celebrate this defining moment in our history and bring the party together in a strong united fashion." But slightly more (40%) believe it will hurt party unity.

Among Democrats, 48% say the move will help on the unity front while 28% disagree. Among unaffiliated voters, 43% say the move will hurt while 27% hold the opposite view.

Clinton quit the race for the Democratic presidential nomination on June 7 after Obama had secured enough delegates largely through the primary process to be the party's nominee.

In a statement yesterday, Clinton said, “With every voice heard and the party strongly united, we will elect Senator Obama president of the United States.” But 24% of Democrats say it’s at least Somewhat Likely that Clinton herself will end up as the Democratic standard bearer. That figure includes 11% who say it’s Very Likely Clinton will be the nominee.

Overall, 49% of voters have a favorable opinion of the former first lady, and an identical number (49%) hold an unfavorable view of her. Those figures are slightly less positive than reviews for either Barack Obama or John McCain. Seventy percent (70%) of Democrats have a favorable opinion of Clinton. Just 45% of African-Americans feel that way, however, while 52% offer a negative assessment.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/half_of_democrats_say_putting_hillary_s_name_in_nomination_will_help_unify_party">Full article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. and how many voted for her? Oh yes about 48%, prob the same people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess my age is showing, but I remember when lots of names
were put in nomination. It made for excitement.

I think it's a good thing for Hillary's supporters to have their time in the limelight. This nomination will make it easier for Hillary to convince her supporters to work as hard as they can for Obama.

Nominating Hillary is also a counter argument to McCain's silly idea that Dems believe Obama is "The One."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only 48% believe it's a good move

That's what the title should say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Or the title could say that only 28 perecent think it is bad because that was in the article as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. If the Clinton-voters find it unifying, then it's unifying. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL, too true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. The title of your post is hilarious!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Slant Of This Type of Article / Poll / etc Is So Frustrating
Convention watchers should expect the names of the other candidates to be placed in roll call as a formality.

It's not that having Clinton's name in roll call is unifying, it's that keeping it from happening would be divisive, and the experts know it. Yet, it's played like this is something unusual and Clinton is cutting in on Obama's face time and oh-those-dreadful-PUMAS-are-so-annoying-but-humor-them-we-must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC