Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Campaign "Clarifies" His Colorado Water Grab Statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:55 AM
Original message
McCain Campaign "Clarifies" His Colorado Water Grab Statement

McCain Campaign "Clarifies" His Colorado Water Grab Statement

by mcjoan

Tue Aug 19, 2008 at 06:51:18 AM PDT

They sure have to do a lot of clarifying in the McCain campaign, don't they?

McCain set off a firestorm last week when he suggested that the 86 year old agreement that allocates the scarce resource of the Colorado River among the seven states of the Colorado Basin "obviously needs to be renegotiated" because of "new realities of high growth, of greater demands on a scarcer resource," he didn't mean it should, you know, be renegotiated, really, to make sure that the high growth states of California, Nevada, and Arizona got more of that scarce resource. But that's sure how it sounded to the people of Colorado.

So here comes the McCain campaign with what he "really" meant:

Tom Kise, the McCain campaign's Colorado spokesman, said McCain was not proposing that the 2007 agreement be reopened or any immediate talks on the compact.

"He's talking about ongoing conversations, conversations that happen this year, next year, 10, 20, 30 years down the road," Kise said.

Kise said McCain knows global warming is changing water conditions in the West, and that means the states need to talk. "As long as water is going to be an issue in the West, there should be an open conversation among all parties," Kise said.

Ah, so the states need to talk, that's all he was saying. Only problem is: they have been.

Considering he's a Senator from one of those seven states in the compact, you think he'd have somewhat of a better grasp of the actual policy making on the issue in his state. See, the seven states' governors came together last year to address current changing water conditions. In fact, they came up with an agreement:

<...>

Into the middle of all this stumbles McCain, ignoring--or completely ignorant of--the fact that the seven governors (including California's, Nevada's, and Arizona's) decided that those states needed to work on how to find some of their own water, ignoring the fact that this was a complex and difficult set of negotiations.

more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. He was joking I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. These corrections seem to happen on a regular basis...
Who are we electing as our president, McCain, or the apologists who show up 24 hours later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. "the candidate doesn't speak for the campaign"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. GMTA...
We seriously need to compile a list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. check out the thread in research
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks!
Wow. That was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another McCain doesn't speak for McCain moment!
How many is this now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now this is the stuff we need to focus on and get on the DU home page
seriously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too late, that's all they have been talking about there for the last 5 days.
If you talk about water in Colorado, you had better not talk about restricting it to Coloradans.

They'll fight over water at the drop of a hat there.
McCain fucked up by even broaching this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep--I own land in Colorado. Water is issue no. 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. yup wonder how he will work the surge into that hornet's race

growing up in Washington State there was only one thing that got people upset "Californians stealing our water". Now in retrospect I wonder that they don't get angry at God for evaporation.


You practically have a Doctorate to follow water rights and know what is fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Once again: "McCain doesn't speak for the McCain campaign"
How many times do we have to tell you people?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. .
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 11:06 AM by mopinko
oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. Are there any commericals on this from the DNC yet?! If NOT the DNC is slow...they have to be quick
...and on the ball.

This is a state taker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. Can anyone from Colorado tell us if there have been ads about this there?
I'm wondering if the plan is to bring it up at the convention.

They must pounce on this. But timing is key as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The "third rail" of western politics
http://www.coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7078

Is simply the start. California Nevada and Arizona may go for it but Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico will not!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Actually he meant absolutely nothing."
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 12:04 PM by K8-EEE
It looks even more stupid to me when they take his stupid statements and interpret them as being utterly meaningless.

What is the opposite of what they say he meant? Like some opponent is going, "My friends, we should never have any conversations regarding water, not this year, next year, 10 20 30 years from now! No conversing about water issues, that's final!"

How stupid....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC