Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Military Code Of Conduct

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ilovemesomechickens Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:43 AM
Original message
U.S. Military Code Of Conduct
Code of Conduct III
a. If I am captured I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy.
e. Such enemies have attempted to lure American POWs into accepting special favors or privileges in exchange for statements, acts or information. Unless it is essential to the life or welfare of that person or another prisoner of war or to the success of efforts to resist or escape, a POW must neither seek nor accept special favors or privileges.
f. One such privilege is called parole. Parole is a promise by a prisoner of war to a captor to fulfill certain conditions such as agreeing not to escape nor to fight again once released—in return for such favors as relief from physical bondage, improved food and living conditions or repatriation ahead of the sick, injured or longer–held prisoners.



Am I missing something? Why does McCain get so much credit for DOING WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Being a decent POW is the only thing he's ever done right.
Edited on Wed Aug-20-08 08:47 AM by TexasObserver
Assuming he did it right.

The Code of Conduct does require resistance, but they also tell you that everyone breaks, it's a just a question of when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Not true
The Code of Conduct that was in place during the Vietnam war was a little tougher then what it is today:


"b. The duty of a member of the armed forces to use all means available to resist the enemy is not lessened by the misfortune of captivity. "

So much for "but they also tell you that everyone breaks"!


"f. Recent experiences of American prisoners of war have proved that, although enemy interrogation sessions may be harsh and cruel, one can resist brutal mistreatment when the will to resist remains intact."

I guess he lost his will when he saw how serious his wounds were and he thought he was going to die!


"b. A member of the armed forces remains responsible for personal actions at all times.

c. A member of the armed forces who is captured has a continuing obligation to resist and to remain loyal to country, service, unit and fellow prisoners.

d. Upon repatriation, POWs can expect their actions to be reviewed, both as to circumstances of capture and conduct during detention. The purpose of such review is to recognize meritorious performance as well as to investigate possible misconduct. Each review will be conducted with due regard for the rights of the individual and consideration for the conditions of captivity; captivity of itself is not a condition of culpability. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, it is true. I was there. You weren't.
Edited on Wed Aug-20-08 09:11 AM by TexasObserver
So please stop trying to tell me what the military was like in 1968. Before your time.

You won't find a single soldier from that era who will tell you different. They told us "everyone breaks." If you don't know that, now is a good time to end your ignorance.

Ask Clifford. Ask Tahiti Nut. Ask anyone on this board who served in the war zone in that era.

I held Top Secret and cryto clearances. I had daily access to very sensitive, highly classified materials. Getting captured was a concern. Every one of us was taught to hold out as long as you could, but recognize that you will break under torture.

The only people that can really judge McCain on his POW days are his fellow POWs in that camp. They know whether he followed their code, and that's what really matters. I've heard some didn't care for him, and I can see how that might be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's just it
He didn't do what he was supposed to do, he gave information to the enemy in order to get medical treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovemesomechickens Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. well what i mean is
everybody talks about how grande it was that he refused to go home before other people.. but in actuality that was something required of him based on the code of conduct... so why does he get praise for doing what he was told to do ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because so many want to ignore that he DIDN'T do what he was supposed to do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Never got that either. All military personnel are held to this standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Drop this subject. Seriously, it only helps McCain if you keep on bringing it up.
It's always a bad idea to let your opponent define the terms of debate. Saying "it's not so tough to be a POW and endure torture and mutilation for two years" only makes you look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sourmilk Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Separated at birth. I wonder if Mike Judge modelled Cotton Hill on McGrumpy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovemesomechickens Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Id like to know where i said that?
my point was, why does he get so much credit for staying when he could have left when infact the code of conducts required him to stay versus others who had been there longer...

so hes a hero because he followed the rules? it just confuses me , thats all.

so maybe you shouldnt put words into peoples mouths, 'it only makes you look stupid'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC