From their moronic, filthy, lying, bullshit, pussy-ass cowardly pro-torture response letter (only a fucking hookum-spookum dillweed fist-fucker would put all caps in a written latter):
And that’s why we are so concerned about the comments you made AFTER you came home from Vietnam. You accused your fellow veterans of terrible atrocities – and, to this day, you have never apologized. Even last night, you claimed to be proud of your post-war condemnation of our actions.http://georgewbush.com/KerryMediaCenter/Read.aspx?ID=3364And yet, when the torture at Abu Ghraib was uncovered, Bush* had this to say:
Their treatment does not reflect the nature of the American people. That's not the way we do things in America. I didn't like it one bit.http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/01/iraq/main615053.shtmlIsn't that the same as the condemnation Kerry had for abuses in Viet Nam during his 1971 Senate testimony?
They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htmlThey can't have it both ways. They are either for torture or against it. The Bush* campaign is flip-flopping on the issue of torture. They can't say that they are against it when the shocking photos first come out and people are unsettled, and now say they are pro-torture months later.