Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: Your bullet point says Palin is 'under state investigation' yet you haven't mentioned it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:55 AM
Original message
MSNBC: Your bullet point says Palin is 'under state investigation' yet you haven't mentioned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. CNBC Mentioned It
And some of the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's more from the Chicago Tribune's swamppolitics blog, who thought this would disqualify her
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/07/mccainpalin_ticket_hits_iceber.html

But now Palin is also caught up in a probe of her official conduct that probably nixes whatever long-shot chance she had to be on the McCain ticket. After all, she's only been a governor for two years.

Questions have arisen over whether Palin used her office to try and fire her ex brother-in-law from a state trooper's position. Palin asserts the charge is untrue but the Alaska Senate this week approved the hiring of an independent investigator to look into the charges.

Palin can take comfort in not having been implicated in the federal corruption investigation that has led to the indictment and conviction of some Alaskan politicians, like Sen. Ted Stevens who was indicted earlier this week.

Palin has another problem. After Alaska's public-safety commissioner Walt Monegan was fired (Monegan has said he felt pressure to dropkick the trooper) Palin replaced him with the former police chief of the city of Kenai. But he quit after it became known that he received a reprimand after sexual harassment allegations were filed against him in his former post.

At the very least, that incident raises some questions about Palin as a chief executive and might take some of the thrill away for some women who might otherwise be excited about seeing her on the ticket.

Thus, a McCain-Palin ticket doesn't appear to be in the cards.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. IMO, that deserves its own thread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I saw this and other bloggers echoing the same thing earlier. Needs its own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. So in other words, she challenged "the club" up there only to become part of it
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:59 PM by mvd
Sounds like a good ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep...only can only imagine if she was a Dem.....
and Obama picked her as hi running mate....I can hear the entire MSM saying...."this was Obama first important decision and he chooses someone involved in a scandal who can be impeached"...they would also say "this shows his inexperience and not ready for the job"....this would be repeated over and over all around the MSM media today but a POW makes the pick and so it is okay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. and they keep mentioning how she will be under scrutiny
but say that this means people will "find out that she has a child with downs syndrome!" , and I guess this doesn't mean mentioning that she is under investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Chuckie Todd just said the trooper was 'beating her sister' so she may get a pass on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Chuckie better have PROOF or that's SLANDER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You can bet 'Chuckie T' got this info directly from the McCain Camp and dutifully repeated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The cop admitted it. He also fired a taser at a 12 year old...
the 12 year old asked him to do it but I would still think that's unethical/illegal on some level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. that's not a reason to summarily fire the trooper
the trooper must be disciplined and publicly charged with assault. OR it effectively never happened. That argument holds no water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. That's not going to matter to most people
They'll feel the cop should have been fired and the guy that was let go just wasn't doing in job by not firing the cop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC