Based on excellent comments in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x684013The point of this ad (from MoveOn maybe) would be to pre-empt the coming attacks from more smearvet ads and a movie where POW's claim that Kerry's testimony "demoralized" them. Perhaps running just ahead of the smearvet release.
*********
(Open with scenes of Vietnam firefight)
On screen : IN 1971, TIME WAS OF THE ESSENCE
On screen: 300 AMERICAN SOLDIERS A DAY WERE DYING IN VIETNAM
Shift to archival video of Kerry speaking to congress:
Kerry: "Well, Senator, frankly it does not appeal to me if American men have to continue to die when they don't have to, particularly when it seems the Government of this country is more concerned with the legality of where men sleep than it is with the legality of where they drop bombs. (Applause on video)"
On screen: NIXON WAS STALLING
Kerry: …"I do not believe it is necessary to stall any longer. I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks…it has been stated time and time again, and was stated by Senator Vance Hartke when he returned from Paris, and it has been stated by many other officials of this Government, if the United States were to set a date for withdrawal the prisoners of war would be returned. I think this negates very clearly the argument of the President that we have to maintain a presence in Vietnam, to use as a negotiating block for the return of those prisoners. The setting of a date will accomplish that."
On screen: IN 1971, JOHN KERRY ASKED CONGRESS TO SET A DATE
On screen: TO BRING OUR SOLDIERS AND POW'S HOME
Kerry: …I think if we can talk in this legislative body about filibustering for porkbarrel programs, then we should start now to talk about filibustering for the saving of lives and of our country.
On screen: JOHN KERRY (insert a punchy line to sum up, ideas?)
Fade with applause from video while firefight continues in background.
***********
Since Kerry's dialogue comes directly from his testimony, not sure how much it can be cut short.
I left in the part about Paris, because he's certain to be attacked on his discussions there, and this puts them in the true perspective.
Any suggestions or commentary? You can tell me why this would be a really stupid ad to run? I'm not a politico, I'm more the artistic type.
Suggestions for completely different approaches welcome here.