Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain needs to weigh in on the Bush-Bolton fallout.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:04 PM
Original message
McCain needs to weigh in on the Bush-Bolton fallout.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:06 PM by ProSense

Bush says he ‘doesn’t consider Bolton credible,’ laments spending ‘political capital’ on him.

The New York Times reports that President Bush recently held an off-the-record meeting with conservative writers. During the meeting, Council on Foreign Relations fellow Max Boot asked Bush why he had diverted from the priorities of his first term. “That’s ridiculous,” Bush said. Boot then read from a Wall Street Journal op-ed by war hawk John Bolton in which Bolton said Bush’s presidency is “in total intellectual collapse.” Bush then lashed out at Bolton:

Bush grew more agitated at the mention of his own former senior diplomat. “Let me just say from the outset that I don’t consider Bolton credible,” the president said bitterly. Bush had brought Bolton into the top ranks of his administration, fought for Senate confirmation and, when lawmakers balked, defied critics to give the hawkish aide a recess appointment. “I spent political capital for him,” Bush said, and look what he got in return.

Matthew Yglesias notes, “Of course Bush is right, Bolton isn’t a credible thinker on national security issues. But Bolton is also right — the inherent unworkability of the Bush doctrine has persuaded Bush to substantially abandon it in the waning days of his administration.”


McCain Wants Bolton Confirmed Quickly :

"I would say that this is an argument to get John Bolton confirmed as our U.N. ambassador," McCain said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "He's smart, he's tough, he will respond to these guys. And he could talk back to these two-bit dictators who have the airfare to New York."


On edit, another instance calling McCain's judgment into question.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about that "ass clown" Micheal Bolton
For those who will get the "office space" reference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. First there josh bolton to consider..
Josh Bolton & Harriet Miers Above the Law
23
"2008
From Glenn Greenwald:

Back in July of last year — more than six months ago — the Senate and House Judiciary Committees were investigating the U.S. attorneys scandal and, as part of that investigation, they issued subpoenas to current Bush Chief of Staff Josh Bolton and former White House counsel Harriet Miers, “compelling” them to appear before the Committee to answer questions. While some Bush officials testified but cited “executive privilege” as a grounds for refusing to answer specific questions, both Miers and Bolton simply refused to show up at all — literally just ignored the subpoena as though it were an invitation.

He goes on to point out the fact that congress is doing nothing to enforce their subpoena and probably never will."

http://fearofignorance.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/josh-bolton-harriet-miers-above-the-law/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're both right..each of their accusations concerning the
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:42 PM by zidzi
other is dead on! Remember all the crap we took from bolton and how we furiously posted "What an Idiot!"

We were right. Yeah, the coporatemedia won't be asking mccain about this and he'll choose to ignore it 'cause it shows what an Idiot he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, and
they both say something about McBush's judgment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It was so blatantly Wrong but the corporatemedia once again
was carrying water for bush while tap dancing furiously.

And they want to give us 4 more years. Wake up and smell the blood, AMerica!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC