|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:09 AM Original message |
What post would you like to see Clinton have in Obama cabinet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Seconded... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaroh (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. third |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 04:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. fourthed (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. We are hopefully losing two Senators - but that does not mean we lose the Senate seats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Except that special elections will take months before those seats are filled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
3. Senator from New York. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. They should "post" on some web site to get our team elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. When the time happens, I would like to see Hillary on the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That one would sting the Republicans for decades to come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. More than that, you would have someone in their who would protect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I can think of many in the Senate that would meet the test of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubeskin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. Other: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 05:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. forget it. Put Howard Dean in as Sec of HHS. He's got the resume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agent William (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
8. A leading figure in the democratic party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Party Line (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Czar's and "Wars On"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. No one will be the new "Ted Kennedy", but there are other people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
9. Senate Majority Leader /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Too little seniority in a seniority conscious body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Health Care is going to be The Issue, and she is our best champion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm going to anti-jinx this post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
30. If Kennedy is well enough he will be that person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Party Line (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
13. This is a silly question, but I'll play... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. I'd like to see Hilary nominated to the Supreme Court... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
34. She's not qualified for that. It'll never happen. Also, she'd hate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
17. I don't want her in the cabinet. She's over quaified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Can the Prez do that? Who's the current majority leader? Would she want that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. No cabinet post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
21. HHS -- with special focus on heathcare reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
23. Hillary will stay in the senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RollWithIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
24. Senate Majority Leader.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nipper1959 (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. She is not qualified and will never be confirmed for that. Plus, it's not her style of working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Bullshit - more qualified than Clarence Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
31. Why would you post a question like this on an anti-Clinton site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
32. Health & Human Services? Not high profile enuf. How 'bout Sec of State? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
36. None. She's more important in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-01-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
39. She needs to be point person in the Senate on Health Care reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC