Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LTTE: Sarah Palin's belief in creationism and how it impacts the local economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:05 AM
Original message
LTTE: Sarah Palin's belief in creationism and how it impacts the local economy
In the Alaska governor's race, Palin has said that she would favor evolution taught alongside creationism. Why does this matter to Bucks County?

The theory of evolution is a critical foundation for the study of modern genetics and disease transmission. If evolution is fallacious, then the basis for advances in genomics and drug development to counter changes (mutations) in bacteria or viral diseases (think reformulations of the flu shot) is also flawed. The Bucks County economy is highly dependent on the science that enables the pharmaceutical industry to continually develop new drugs. Understanding the basis for how diseases change is critical towards administering public health and controlling disease transmission. Teaching the next generation unscientific nostrums will deprive the pharmaceutical industry of its next-generation workforce and lead to a demise in our competitiveness in the global pharmaceutical market.

In a broader sense, this equivocation about evolution is an assault on our capabilities to look at the world around us, study the facts, and organize them rationally. No doubt that should Palin become elected, she will govern with similar appeals to irrationality.

Unlike Wasilla, Alaska, with a high school graduation of 58%, Bucks County with a college graduation rate of 87% has the intelligence not to elect an official that refuses to believe in science.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. 58%! They all *flunked* science, I bet! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilmywoodNCparalegal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you! That's what ultimately the teaching of creationism
even if alongside evolution and accepted scientific theories would lead to... a denial of science and scientific progress. How can the US competently compete in the sciences and engineering without an understanding of the basis of scientific thought over the past 200 years?

I was on vacation a couple of weeks ago in LA and I visited Griffith Observatory. While enthralled by its exhibits, I was thinking to myself that if creationists were to make laws, in the long run places such as Griffith would be closed down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC