Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Palin Won't Bail and McCain Will Fail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:48 AM
Original message
Why Palin Won't Bail and McCain Will Fail
Even though there seems to be a revelation-a-minute regarding McCain's vice-presidential running-mate, I put my money on her not leaving the ticket. This was inspired by an earlier thread, and, since I'm a raving egomaniac, I decided to put my comments in a separate post. The thesis: He's stuck with her. The reason: Because they are who they are. The reason you won't see a change anytime soon is two-fold: problem one is Palin, and problem two is McCain.

Sarah Palin is currently under an ethics investigation. It's not her first. This past week I've tried to nail down what it was about her that made me so fascinated with her, what she had that both riveted and appalled me--and then I got it.

She has self-involvement without self-awareness. When she's right, she just *is*, and the Lord spake from a bush, and that was that. You look like a potential troublemaker in Sarah's big plans for Wasilla? You could be out http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/510219.html --and if you won't enforce a book ban, her eyes are on you. That's brass, right there. Does it make her look like a little tinpot dictator? Ah, well. In that little town, all she could think about was being in charge of something bigger. All I've heard about is her lowering property taxes to get businesses in, while at the expense of residents, she raised sales taxes; and hiring that lobbyist to get more Fed money to grow the town more, but not to attend to stuff that might have been useful to the residents.

Like a sewage treatment plant--vs. all the trouble she went to for a sports complex. I understand the sports comlex is nice and is used a lot, but still. Style--not substance. She ran on being a Christian, not on potholes and PTA. When she neared the end of her term, she was already angling for onward & upward. Her spot on the energy comission that got her the reputation as a reformer seems to have come about because of a, well, *snit.* She go into it with someone, they pissed her off, and she hacked their computer. I'm not sure that's exactly how it went down--but sounds like it to me.

And then she's the same way as governor--line-item vetoing stuff pretending she's against gov't waste, that the state legislature has to put back in as being necessary, while she's behind over $500 million in porkbarrel "asks" like that Bridge to Nowhere. And starting beefs with Dept heads over personnel she has issues with, like her ex-brother-in-law.

You want to try and explain, after saying you vetted her, after asking her, after her saying yes, outing her kid's personal business (did McCain even know until the last minute? Seriously.) after she causes all this hype and got all this attention at the convention--that she should step down because come to find out she "isn't a good fit?"

Oh hell no, she wouldn't. Not this one. Here's an opportunity to do some real stuff, now that they explained to her what a VP can do. She will stick this out--drop out? "Thanks, but no thanks."

The ball would be back in McCain's court. You remember him--he's the Maverick who picked her. There's a couple of things we need to square away about him. First, he's kind of needing to reestablish his Maverick cred, because the "McSame" logic just might stick. Second, I think he doesn't like any better being told what to do than Palin does. And then, he's "old school." This is a Lady's Honor he's defending. Even better than the pitiful pearl clutching over the bastards who would demean his POW experience by implying that did not give him super-executive mad skills, would be the manly interpolation of his honorable self between the evil media, and the beset-upon-by-barbarians Sarah Palin. The damsel fair should be protected, for she is Conservative GOLD. No press--just fund-raisers.

(Caribou Barbie depreciates in value when you take her out of the box--don't you know.)

If he is made to say his campaign made a mistake, it could only be if some relevation so evilly scandalous like, I dunno, some Great Northern Slope Spouse Swap scenario swarmed up from the tabloid depths with anything like plausibility attached. Or, like, if she killed a guy. That would be bad, too. Otherwise, it would be going back on his word. And word is bond, yo, when you're old school like McCain. He'd have to go through some political stages of grief:

1) Denial. "She never was part of any such scandal. She's a fine person, so stop saying that."

2) Anger: "You journalists and especially you bloggers, don't make me angry. You won't like me when I'm angry."

3) Bargaining, "Hey, maybe she and Joe Lieberman can take turns as VP--he's got enough sanctimony for two people!"

4)Depression: "People say I'm in a depression, but I say that's really just psychological."

5) Acceptance: "Now that the Secret Service have separated Sarah from my leg, and Joe Lieberman from my other leg, I am happy to announce that I am running with a card-board cut-out of Ronald Reagan, who is standing in for a Republican to be named later. May rhyme with 'bridge...' No? May rhyme with...."

6) Lather, rinse repeat: "This is an upstanding gentleman who has been supremely well-vetted and we all love the heck out of him, Newt Gingrich, everybody...." Crickets. "You can clap." Crickets. "What was it, the ex-wives or the crappy books? Help me out here...I'm running out of time! Is there a Dr. in the house?"

The McCain/Paul ticket, while weird, would get so much train-wreck gawker attention, that it would sweep into the White House just so people had the promise of a new reality show. It would only last one trm, because four years is about how long a reality show remains enjoyable. But that's politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm loving it!
You go, girl!

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks much!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with you McSame will not let her go. He does not understand that she a live grenade under
his ass that can go off in Oct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's hoping!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC