Reflections on Palin from a Christian in Wasilla

Politico links to this article:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2008159242_webwasillamom04.html

Excerpt:

I would argue that a true pro-family stance insists on far more than not aborting one's offspring. Responsible parenting acknowledges the need for individuals to take responsibility for their actions starting with the procreative act, which brings with it the potential of long-term consequences.

These consequences do not come cheap. Caring for a child is emotionally draining, expensive, and time-consuming.

Yet, it remains the Christian duty of both parents to ensure that between mother and father, provision and parental presence are available until the child achieves the maturity to make wise choices for him or herself as an adult.

A friend asked me today how I would have reacted, had one of my daughters come to me with the hard news that young Bristol brought to her parents.

After some thought, I answered that I would feel that I had failed my daughter in some way.

My friend suggested that the Palins undoubtedly feel likewise, and with this I tend to agree.

And yet, Sarah Palin actively chose to engage the national media machine rather than passing by this opportunity in favor of supporting her daughter through a physically and emotionally trying time.

I can't find any way to get around the facts: Here is a mother who chose ambition over the needs of a daughter in crisis.

And her ruthlessness with her perceived enemies also speaks to it.

The kids are all props.

I haven't seen it here. Sorry for repeating it if it ha already been posted.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/kilkenny.asp

Kilkenny says she has known Palin since 1992.

Thanks.