Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polls, Schmolls. Why we needn't panic, but why we need to work our butt off...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:10 PM
Original message
Polls, Schmolls. Why we needn't panic, but why we need to work our butt off...
To those of you who know me, I'm a British ex-pat, grew up in the Thatcher years and had my formation of politics around the time of John Major and the rise of Tony Blair. I remember the 1992 General Election and the BBC coverage of the night.

According to exit polls, and previous opinion polls, the BBC announced minutes after polling closed, Neil Kinnock and the Labour Party had won enough seats so that if he tied up with the Liberal Democrats that he could form a government, based on an average 0.8% opinion poll lead. The end result was the opposite: John Major was able to form a majority parliament with 21 seats - no coalition needed - based on an actual 7.5% of popular vote lead. The BBC was updating its prediction reguarly and I saw it creep from hung Labour to hung Tory to Tory majority. In other words the polls were wrong by 8.3% - quite a big margin. The 1992 poll inaccuracies were apparently due to undersampling conservative voters and underassigning the "don't knows" to Labour rather than the Conservatives. Apparently Conservative voters didn't want to admit they're going to vote Conservative.

Subsequent to that, the polling organisations re-checked their methodologies, tried out different things and basically got back on track. Most polls afterwards got the election right within a percentage point or two

How does this play out here Stateside? Well, polling organisations want to be accurate. They devise schemes and statistical modelling to ensure that any biases in their samples are ironed out. The question is each time have they got it right? Are the polls skewed in our favour? Are they skewed the other way? We'll only be able to tell after the poll that actually matters: November 4th, 2008.

So the take away message here is: 1. Even if the polls show us 5-8 points ahead, treat it as if we're 5-10 points behind and work accordingly. 2. Are there hidden Republicans, not admitting who they're going to vote for? 3. Are the polls right? If the polls are wrong then why worry?

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freeforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Polls
Never mind the polls! I hope there will not be any dirty Repub tricks with the voting machines like in the past two elections. Who can forget Florida in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC