Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC drops Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews from anchor chair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:40 PM
Original message
MSNBC drops Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews from anchor chair
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:11 PM by yourguide
MSNBC drops Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews from anchor chair... David Gregory will anchor news coverage of the coming debates and election night.... Developing...

From sludge report. WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!?!?!?!?!

http://www.drudgereport.com/


Confirmed via NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/business/media/08msnbc.html&OQ=_rQ3D2Q26refQ3DbusinessQ26orefQ3Dslogin&OP=127f0c6dQ2F2KQ60h2a.Q26pY..tQ2B2Q2BQ5EQ5EG2Q5Ex2Q5EG2hopQ22JQ60pp2Q5DQ60aQ22Q5B2Q5EGQ5DpJhQ26O0tQ5D9


CALL MSNBC NOW: 1 212 664 4444


The woman answering the phone is a B*TCH!

Also:

letters@msnbc.com
viewerservices@msnbc.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. HIT HARD BACK ON THIS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatscott15 Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. WHAT - This Can't be true
Probably just another Drudge lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akangel2008 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. They'll run Kaite Couric. This is brilliant!!!
So she can hammer the pants off Palin without coming across as mean. This is actually a great move!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
80. Katie Couric works for CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akangel2008 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #80
87. *sheepish grin* my bad I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. David Fucking Gregory?!?! Are you kidding me, that republican shill
Why not just turn it over to Pat Buchanon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. This cannot be true , what is wrong with these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Who is on the board of directors of MSNBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. We forget so quickly that David Gregory was one of the few who was asking the
hard-hitting questions when Scott McClellen was the press secretary.

Of course, none of that matters since he's somehow an asshole conservative.

:sarcasm:

Lay off of Gregory. He's more objective than most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Yeah, we also remember him after that dancing on stage with Karl Rove.
Yeah -- Karl Rove.

He's sold his soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. Gregory argued with the press secretary
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:24 PM by creeksneakers2
but it was all for show. Gregory's reports were very pro-Bush. Bush even sexually humiliated Gregory in front of the rest of the reporters and the viewing public. Gregory sat there and took it. Nobody ever complained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. You got that one right...
It was all for show...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
82. That was THEN: he's since sold his soul to the devil ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
72. Dancing backup for 'M.C. Rove' apparently pays off big time.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wrong fucking forum....and already posted one minute ago..
There's a KO forum.

This is General Discussion-Presidential.

And, there's another post here on the same news item.

Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I don't think it was inappropriate to post this here. Is there perhaps
an argument forum where you should have posted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. No, but I propose we get one....
Some of the members, veterans, are tearin' each other apart over Palin, the polls, everything else.

Not much room in here for KO shockers, there is a forum for it, after all.

And, BTW, I didn't "post".

I replied to a post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Oh my goodness! I'd say you posted a reply!
I don't know about your DU user interface, but when I post this reply, I have to click a little button that says "Post Message". I think the verb in that sentence is "post", not reply. I don't know what the the smartasses call it back on Mount Fucking Olympus where YOU obviously dwell, but at DU, we "post".


"You say tomato...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
69. I don't read the other forums..it fits in fine here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. NYC_SKP
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:18 PM by yourguide
First, check the post times...obvious it was posted at the same time as the other.

Second, this involves the presidential debates. Thus GD: P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. sheesh
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #41
77. Fair enough...I'm happy with my day phonebanking to Nevada voters.
Took a break, looked like another case of repetitive outrage postings over an MSNBC anchor... Like the Russert madness.

KO and Matthews are still commenting, they just won't be the "lead anchor", right?

Sorry for being snappy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. McCain's attacks on the media are working.
His aggressiveness is paying off in myriad ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not a big surprise. Olbermann isn't exactly unbiased, and Tweety has the reputation as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. So now we a rw biased A$$hole..Fuck
that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I don't like Gregory, but rightwing asshole?
gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
90. Yes. Rightwing asshole. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. Deal with it? How cute. I'll simply reject it.
Deal with that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Are you implying Gregory IS unbiased? Are you kidding me?
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 08:51 PM by quantass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yeah, I'm implying that Gregory is unbiased.
He was chapping Bush's butt long before anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. He has been pushing RW talking points for some time. Havent you been paying attention.
If you want to talk unbias i would choose Maher...Sorry Gregory is an embarassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Bill Maher? Surely not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
89. Maher? I'm a HUGE Bill Maher fan. Have all his dvds and his books
but he is NOT unbias. He is very very bias. His bias makes Gregory look like Edward Murrow. I am pissed they made this change to, but I see no way anyone can look at Maher and say "Well that man isn't liberal... in fact he's entirely unbaised."

That makes no sense, and Maher would be the FIRST to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why not just simulcast FOX while you're at it, MSNBC?
Unbelieveable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbrnmw Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. THEY MAY HAS WELL
I am going to do the same thing I have done with Faux Slews never watch it If this is true they have lost their fucking mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well we now know how the debates turn out, regardless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, won't be watching Gregory for sure. Pretty soon I am going to run out of cable or networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted by poster, this posted 3 times.
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 08:46 PM by EV_Ares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted by poster, this posted 3 times.
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 08:46 PM by EV_Ares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. I guess I'll be watching CNN and/or C-SPAN.
David Gregory, Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan just don't cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Corporate Masters have spoken...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. I just wrote 3 emails to MSNBC. That's the only channel I can stomach, but without Keith,
I won't watch it.

David Gregory stinks. Can't stand the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't see the link on Drudge?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Its there on the right side column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
56. Front Page New York Times
it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbrnmw Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh HELL NO
HELL NO WE CANT LET THEM DUMP KO WTF IS WRONG WITH MSNBC ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
85. KO will still have his own show and still appear as an analyst....
...during other coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here it comes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimisticin08 Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. MSNBC has caved to mccain!!!
I hope KO has something to say about this tomorrow!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. OMFG. I just hope they broadcast the debates on c-span, or I'll
have to watch them after the fact on YouTube.

I WILL NOT enable the RW as they complete the total assimilation of the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
62. I'm with yah on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. I will believe this when i see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. ARHGGHGHGHGHGGH!!!!!
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:00 PM by TwoSparkles
This is truly disgusting!!!

So, they're getting rid of everyone who doesn't toe the neocon line? Olbermann and Matthews won't cover up for those bastards,
so they're purging the anchor chairs of anyone who might ask Sarah Palin a question that doesn't have to do with hockey, the PTA or oil
reserves in Alaska.

These sick bastards.

My guess is that all media is currently kow towing to John McCain--pleading with him, "What can we do to get in your good graces??
Please don't hate us! Tell us what to do and how we can get you and Sarah to start speaking to us! Don't hate us. Give us marching
orders and we will take them!"

It's been widely publicized that McCain is being an ass to the media and refusing all interviews.

I guess we're seeing that MSNBC is willing to do anything to cater to John McCain.

John McCain's little drama-queen episode worked. He needed the media scrubbed, before it was safe to bring out "I only know a few lines" Palin.

What a crock. Completely disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. We should have stopped watching that Gregory asshole a long time ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. Didn't he make a real offensive comment about Chelsea Clinton during the primary?
I can't quite recall what he said but I recall half of DU up in arms over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Party Line Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
58. That was David Schuster
Making a comment about the Clinton campaign "pimping" Chelsea for the youth vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. No, that was David Shuster.
He was suspended for it. And he apologized.

See this:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
61. No, that was David Shuster.
He was suspended for it. And he apologized.

See this:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. I find this hard to believe KO show is a huge ratings driver which = $ for the network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
76. Not his show. I believe it's just the anchor chair for election coverage? Isn't it? Somebody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. Guess they want to promote C-SPAN viewership. That's kind of them.
I'd be happy to continue viewing such events on the Span, as we affectionately call it.

It's only if MSNBC has Keith and Rachel and Eugene that I think about checking in there instead of my dear CSpan.

It is only those three that can pull me in to the MSNBC world. Perhaps a few others. There are some more regular commentators I like.

Chris Matthews, when he wasn't bending over backward to prop up bankrupt Republican talking points, was quite interesting. But on his daily beat he tries too hard to make Republican crap sound sensible. Wish we had his wit just honestly assessing these miserable eight years we've had. Sigh...

But David Gregory will just drive me away with his deadpan style. Too dry. And sometimes also delivers those RNC talking points with too much of a straight face even when the premise of those points is clearly contradicted by known fact.

I'll be fine with my dear CSpan. And am glad that MSNBC will push more viewers toward that wonderful resource. Book TV has gotten me through some sad times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbrnmw Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Very Sad
This might be the new Washington Bureau Chief firing long timers and bringing in his Oh how I miss Russert.

RIP Tim we miss you dearly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Keith Olbermann is a MUCH bigger star than Gregory. I'm curious to see what he has to say.
It may be that Olbermann didn't like being tethered to the host position because he's supposed to be neutral.

Olbermann just helped Maddow get her show.

He's still got plenty of swing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Matthews is a bigger star than Gregory as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Right now only d+Drudge has this report
So really it's just a rumor. I mean I haven't seen any other source, like the AP, reporting this, has anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cruadin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
45. I wouldn't take anything on Drudge...
too seriously; unless or until it's verified elsewhere.

He's a rumor monger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Confirmed via NY Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. Akkk,,,okay I'm calling and writing
This is unacceptable, and should be our next DU activist corp assignment. We should all be calling and writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
46. And I should believe Sludge why?
Don't get your panties in a wad until it's confirmed by a reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. confirmed via NY times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #49
88. If so, it's a sad day
but why the freak would they put on Maddow and can Olbermann? The only thing that makes sense is that Maddow is cheaper than the buyout of Olbermanns contract. I still think there's something hinkey about the story. Let's see what comes out in the next few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
47. Done.
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:38 PM by 1corona4u
I wrote to the viewer services address. This is bullshit.

Here is what I said to them;

HAVE YOU GONE TO THE RIGHT WINGERS????? This is BULLSHIT!!! I just heard that you have dropped Matthews and Olbermann from the debates anchor chairs!!! David GREGORY?? The RIGHT WING SYMPATHIZER!!!!!! It's pretty OBVIOUS who you want to win this election!!!!! This is OUTRAGEOUS!! David Gregory doesn't even try to HIDE the FACT he's a rightwinger!! I intend to write as many of your advertisers as I can, and let them know I will NEVER buy their products if they continue advertising with MSNBC. You are DEFINITELY going to lose viewers over this!!!!

SCREW you MSNBC!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. McNutbag has the country by the balls now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
54. gregory is a tool
he`s a perfect host for general electric microshit national broadcasting system.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
55. Why not Madow, or are they sexist too? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
57. I don't mind
KO and Rachel will still be on the panels and have their own shows to do commentary

Plus it's football season, KO's got his plate full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
64. I dunno why MSNBC wants to flush their lefty viewers away
When will they ever learn that to make the cash they can't just be a clone of fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bevoette Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
65. the polls don't bother me. this does. how much power...
do they have to have that they can force them to pull their most popular/highest rated hosts??

seriously...HOW MUCH??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Cheney must be mailing out his anthrax letters again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
66. my letter to them
To Whom it May Concern,

I just heard you pulled KO off the debates and election coverage.

I am sorry to hear this. It seems as if MSNBC is catering to McCain's obvious attempt to manipulate the media AGAIN.

I was watching MSNBC -- it was MY channel because of Keith and Rachel, the only anchors reporting with hard hitting facts and a semblance of intelligence.

This is a sad day for America. Softballs for the Gender Card playing Gov Palin and McCain, whose efforts to hide from the press deprive Americans of their right to a free press, without which we have NO democracy. It's tough to believe you are actually reacting this way to accusations of KO being "leftist". Newsflash: the centrists in this country are the majority and we are tired of having extremist RW talking points shoved down our throats as "news". But, then, you know this.

C-SPAN it is, then.

I hope a plausible explanation is forth-coming, otherwise you've lost another viewer for good.

Sincerely,


xxxxxxx

(cc'd to the media watch dogs)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #66
81. Excellent. I wish I would have been that composed.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
68. Stupid, stupid, stupid move
The MSNBC overlords were "embarrassed" by the on-air squabbles? Come ON--that gets the network viewers and word-of-mouth and YouTube viral vids the like of which other news networks only dream of! That's ratings gold, fer chrissakes!

Either someone at MSNBC has completely lost touch with the ins and outs of the ratings game or someone in the repuke party made a phone call.

I say again: STUPID move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
70. Olbermann & Matthews will remain as analysts during the coverage
From the NYT link:

After months of accusations of political bias and simmering animosity between MSNBC and its parent network NBC, the channel decided over the weekend that the NBC News correspondent and MSNBC host David Gregory would anchor news coverage of the coming debates and election night. Mr. Olbermann and Mr. Matthews will remain as analysts during the coverage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
71. Well the just lost MY viewship for the duration of the election.
And I was happy to tell them so on their "viewer comment line." This is truly, truly fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
74. I won't be watching MSNBC if this is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
75. How should I start my letter?
"Dear MSNBC: Do you spit or swallow?"

"Dear MSNBC: Why are you replacing Olbermann with a guy who's propaganda sounds better in the original German?"

"Dear MSNBC: DIE IN A FIRE!!! AND YOUR PRISON SHOWS TOO!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. LOL, I say; spit or swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
78. Well, that's it for MSNBC then
No need to ever turn to that fucked up channel any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
79. Good reason for me to cancel cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. If not for C-Span...
...I would, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
84. McCain campaign lied to MSNBC
From the NY Times article:
======================================================
The McCain campaign has filed letters of complaint to the news division about its coverage and openly tied MSNBC to it. Tension between the network and the campaign hit an apex the day Mr. McCain announced Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. MSNBC had reported Friday morning that Ms. Palin’s plane was enroute to the announcement and she was likely the pick. But McCain campaign officials warned the network off, with one official going so far as to say that all of the candidates on the short list were on their way — which MSNBC then reported.

“The fact that it was reported in real time was very embarrassing,” said a senior MSNBC official. “We were told, ‘No, it’s not Sarah Palin and you don’t know who it is.’ ”
======================================================
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
91. Woops. looks like MSNBC has a deep-seated fear of relevance.
To MSNBC: you can be helped, but it will take acknowledging that you need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
92. Olbermann never had any business hosting debates, conventions or election coverage
I've posted that for more than a year. His themes, facial expressions and tone all scream of bias.

Matthews is schizo but at least he can make points in favor of both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
93. I let them know exactly what I think of Gregory
and how I will not be watching on election night as I did before. I can't stand Gregory. He is boring and can't control the panelists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC