Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT does a good job of explaining McCain's faux "lipstick" outrage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:40 AM
Original message
NYT does a good job of explaining McCain's faux "lipstick" outrage
“John McCain says he’s about change, too – except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s not change. That’s just calling the same thing something different. You can put lipstick on a pig – it’s still a pig.”

At that point, Mr. Obama paused for just a moment, no doubt imagining the whoops that were going up at the McCain headquarters where they were no doubt monitoring the speech, and aware of the extent to which both campaigns are seeking to seize on anything even approaching a slip of the tongue.

So he added: “You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change, it’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”

For the record, Mr. Obama did not even mention Ms. Palin until a few minutes later in his speech. Still, within 45 minutes, Mr. McCain’s campaign – well aware of the competition for the women’s vote and how this might be interpreted among women voters – leapt onto the remark.. .Mr. Obama’s campaign responded by digging up a quote by Mr. McCain in 2007 in which he was criticizing a health care plan by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” Mr. McCain said.


http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/shades-of-lipstick-tint-a-race/

The MSM is beginning to do its job instead of being stenographers for the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's because they can read the writing on the walls
This thing will slowly, steadily tilt towards Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC