Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Response from the WaPO regarding possible scrubbed story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:48 PM
Original message
Response from the WaPO regarding possible scrubbed story
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 05:49 PM by Dissent Is Patriotic
I just received the following response from WaPo regarding my concerns about a possible scrubbed story:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a misunderstanding about the release time of the article, and it
will appear again at the appropriate time. Thank you for your inquiry.

Cheers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Erica ----@yahoo.com>
To: national@washpost.com
Subject: Concerns about possible scrubbed story
09/11/2008 05:26 PM Hello,

It has come to my attention that the Washington Post may have scrubbed an article about a corruption scandal
involving John McCain and his wife, Cindy. Alternatively, I have heard that you may be withholding information
about this story.

I have been a loyal reader of the Post in print and on line. If it were true that you were doing such a thing, I
can assure you that I would no longer buy the paper or view it on line or patronize any of your sponsors. I would
also let your sponsors know exactly why I am no longer patronizing them.

The question is, what are you hiding, and why?

I await your reply.

Erica
--------------------------------------------------------
So what was the misunderstanding and how should I respond?

(on edit added "and how should i respond?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. So...
They have a story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. We look forward to reading the re-release then. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is the appropriate time still this week?
And, is it going to be something old, something new, something borrowed or something blue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Nov 6, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. That reply -- for the first time I'm giving credence
to the opinions that maybe they're getting more ammo (and covering their asses) before the print it.

Great letter, by the way! And I have to give kudos to the WaPo - many wouldn't have responded at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was surprised they left the comment enabled at the mystery link...
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 05:56 PM by Kristi1696
People are raging, but WaPo is at least letting them have at it.

Edited: because my fingers don't seem to want to type today :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Cheers"?
They actually wrote that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Woot!
You ROCK!

Thanks so much for e-mailing them. This is work very well done!

Looks like they may be holding this for a prime news-cycle after all! (or until after November :eyes:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. "The appropriate time"???? Maybe they mean, like sitting on it until Nov. 5th ??? ~nt~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC