Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin didn't get the questions ahead of time.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:07 PM
Original message
Palin didn't get the questions ahead of time.
Otherwise she would know what the Bush Doctrine is.

Sorry folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kinda funny though that Rove didn't think to drill her on that. Even he probably...
...thought she'd know that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Especially since she was yelling "Drill Here, Drill Now"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainStorm Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I actually didn't remember what the Bush doctrine was.
I knew that he established the precedent for preemptive war, but I didn't know it had a name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If you were handed the questions ahead of time ...
you would know what the Bush doctrine is, your handlers would make sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainStorm Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Yes.
My current handlers neglected to inform me. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Congrats, you're qualified to be McCain's Secretary of State
:rofl:

Just kidding with you. :hug:

I understood why he asked her that though. The question before that was why did they attack us on 9/11. You could see that Charlie Gibson was visibly disturbed by her answer because it sounded too much like what Bush would have said during his 1st term. I think Charlie then made the decision to find out just exactly how closely aligned her foreign policy viewpoint was to Bush's, so he asked her about the Bush Doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainStorm Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. LOL!!
Thanks, I'll pass on a cabinet appointment this year. :)

I agree with your analysis. Gibson was actually trying to understand what her foreign policy views were in specific. I think he did a good job of showing just how scary her views are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. And what national position are you running for? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainStorm Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. For that new cabinet position, the Secretary of Coffee.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I had heard that Lieberman was coaching her
Was that story false? It seems to me that Lieberman lives and breathes such things as the Bush Doctrine, elective wars, and self-righteous killing and that it flows through his veins like blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. That's what I heard
Lieberman was bringing her up to speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would hope not. If she did then she's borderline brain dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:16 PM
Original message
I know - I know
The teleprompter broke again - right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. dupe nt.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 08:16 PM by BlueIdaho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. You can't study for life...It's not a test.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes she did. She just choked on it. Probably her ear piece went dead
There's no way Rove would let her on TV without knowing the questions ahead of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, just like she "winged" her convention speech because the teleprompter was broken
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 08:24 PM by DeschutesRiver
which turned out to be a big fat lie.

It wouldn't be unusual at all for a person of her low caliber mind to be unable to absorb all the information being driven into such soft brain matter. Honestly, this is a woman who asked for flash cards as she preps to answer questions about her qualifications for one of the biggest jobs we have in this country.

Flash card learning, at this level. It is horrifc to contemplate this moron getting into office. Even when Charlie TOLD her what the doctrine was, her mind couldn't understand it. So no, even with advance questions, I am convinced that content just doesn't resonate with Sarah. Only quick one line flash card answers, and even with that, there appears to be a limit to how many she can process and repeat on command.

The Bush doctrine pushed her over her line limit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anexio Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. What the hell is the Bush Doctrine?
Nobody seems to know that the Bush Doctrine is except you and Sir Charles.

People at lot smarter than you and I are scratching their heads as to what that is so why the hostility?

Personally, I'm spending my weekend working door to door for Obama and not participating in wacko hatred like you display.

The goal is to convince people to vote for Obama because he's the guy we need to elect. Political noobs like you think it's okay to discredit the opposition and that will be enough. Obama's message is strong enough to stand on it's own. You don't need to spend time pointing out the obvious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. wow, you seem really concerned about anyone pointing out her unfitness for the office.
just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anexio Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Really?
Tell me, could you define the so called "Bush Doctrine" before last night?

I'm watching three TV channels right now and none, I repeat none of the talking heads can define the fucked up Bush Doctrine.

I dont know why you are so smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. yes, I could
because it is an affront to everything I consider good about america, and I remember EXACTLY the day he did it. I also remember when they started Gitmo, and when Abu Ghraib happened, and when torture was made "legal".

its because I care so much about this country that I keep track when it is sullied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Do you carry this level of anger on every subject? Cause that's just not healthy.
Seriously, why are you being so aggressive about this? Is it because since YOU didn't know what it was, you don't think ANYBODY should have known?

Attack me. I knew. And I knew before last week, too. Honestly, I didn't realize that it wasn't relatively common knowledge. My daughter and I talked about the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war in contrast to the Monroe Doctrine when I was homeschooling her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. of course. it's not exactly rocket science.
and sorry, it's absolutely legitimate to criticize Palin for her abject ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. But shouldn't the potential VP know it? Especially a republican
follower of *. In fact, they'd be the ones that would know it and proudly using that serious sounding term for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. Well, that was militant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. The "Bush Doctrine" is so universally recognized that it has come part of our everyday language.
Examples:

i will "GOOGLE" the information.
"9/11" changed everything.
They're 'SHREDDING THE CONSTITUTION".
Are we on "RED ALERT"?
'COMPASSSIONATE CONSERVATIVE", my ass.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. well, considering she STILL didn't get it after Gibson explained it three times,
I'd say her messing up doesn't prove she didn't have the questions ahead of time.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. McCain and Palin are 100% owned by the people who control Bush.
The only question is how they'll spin it.

Nobody needs the question in advance to figure out that by "the Bush doctrine" is meant "the Bush doctrine on war", esp. the "doctrine" that justified the war on and occupation of Iraq. Even Palin, even the most stupid of americans, should have that much of a clue. It just goes to show how mind-f&*ked the average US citizen has become, that Palin's stonewalling wasn't totally laughed off the screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. Exactly. It's not like the war monger had a "Doctrine" on anything else
Edited on Sat Sep-13-08 09:13 AM by chill_wind
(see post # 36)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. And she wouldn't have to say "Charlie" nervously after every other word. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't think it occured to them that she didn't know what the Bush doctrine is
I think they just assumed that she knew and this will happen a lot cause she really doesn't know much of anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. They negotiate the AREAS of discussion. They don't give them the exact questions.
So in a matter of speaking, Palin did have an idea of the general topics of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's possible she did see them, and *thought* she knew what the doctrine was
I mean maybe she really did beleive it was a general question about his views, and not a specific foreign policy position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. This seems likely
She has that deadly combination of confidence and incompetence.

I mean, I'm not sure she got the questions ahead of time, but her entire record is one of thinking that she knows more than she actually does. And also thinking that she has more power than she actually does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. I agree
she was completely unprepared quite obviously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. I thought she DID get the questions ahead of time.
And that what's so inexcusible about not knowing what the Bush Doctrine is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
32. She forgot it between the coaching and the airing
She couldn't recall it when asked. You can study something and not remember everything. I envy you if you always learn everything you see and don't forget any portion of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. I don't think she got the questions in advance either...
if she had, she would have been better prepared. Unless she doesn't have enough mental capacity to memorize answers. Which is a distince possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
36. Fah. She she had at least **TEN Bush team veterens** intensively prepping her
She didn't need the exact questions. Very hard to believe the term never came up from the Bush FP people assigned to her, but it's not like it was a trick question.

Ten-- I counted TEN *Bush* people assigned to her campaign.

Palin team stocked with Bush veterans

Jonathan Martin Wed Sep 10, 1:32 PM ET



Newly hired aides are briefing her on likely questions and topics when ABC’s Charlie Gibson sits down with her later this week in Alaska.

The intensive prep session includes staffers going through footage of previous interviews by the "World News Tonight "anchor, according to an aide.

McCain aides declined to say whether they’re readying Palin by asking mock questions.

“We’re preparing her for the interview as you would prepare any principal,” said this aide, noting that Palin prefers concise briefing material and topics addressed on notecards and in bulleted fashion.


(..)

Offering policy counsel will be Steve Biegun, a seasoned foreign policy specialist who did stints as a senior member of Bush’s National Security Council and as national security adviser to former Sen. Bill Frist, when he was Senate majority leader. He’s taken a leave from his position as a government affairs executive at Ford Motor Co.

Also helping on the policy front is Joe Donoghue, a longtime McCain aide who has worked for years in the Arizonan’s Senate office. He’ll travel with Palin and serve as a liaison to the campaign headquarters on issues.



link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/13323
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avis Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
37. Called him McCain
I thought it odd that she called him McCain. It didn't seem natural to call someone that you supposedly admire or now a personal friend, McCain? Shouldn't it have been Senator McCain or John?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
40. I doubt she got 'em after the fact, either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC