Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the Keating Five scandal never, ever mentioned by anybody?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:13 AM
Original message
Why is the Keating Five scandal never, ever mentioned by anybody?
Are we saving it for later? Or is it not that damaging to McCain after all? I have to admit, I don't understand all the ins and outs of the thing. But after all the Rezko-Ayers smears of Obama, I was sure someone would at least mention this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. KO mentioned it last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps they are trying to figure out how to spin the story.. There were
4 Democrats involved with that scandal I thought? NO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is hanging over mcPOW's head like a giant hammer.
Ready to be dropped at any moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. the worse wall street gets, the bigger keating will get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. McCain was exonerated with a slap on the wrist. Three Dems were
found to have acted improperly. Keating could easily cut both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's been mentioned quite a bit lately. Here's two examples
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why is the S & L Scandal, PERIOD, never mentioned by anybody?
You know, that little thing called the Garn/St. Germain Bill? When Saint Ronnie signed it, he said something like "All in all, I think we've hit the jackpot."

For those not familiar, this bill lifted FDR-era restrictions on thrifts, more or less allowing Wall Street speculators to use S & L's as their own personal mints and swindled billions in retiree dollars.

They took these billions and placed them in the riskiest investments possible - to the taxpayers.

Certain congressmen and senators (one of whom is running for president, and it's not the one who was a community organizer when this all happened) were paid with this thrift cash to back off looking into it. The resulting bailout totalled something like 1.2 trillion when all was said and investigated. Chuck Keating was jailed and the senators/congress (AGAIN, one of the current presidential candidates) were let off with a slap on the wrist.

The relaxing of these regulations, along with the financial piracy of dickheads like Mike Milken and Ivan Boesky, ushered in the era of rampant white collar crime the Reagan years were known for, and we'll be paying for that shit for the rest of our lives, all thanks to Teflon Ron and his allowance for unbridled capitalism.

This looting and it's onus on the American taxpayer set the precedent for the criminality we see today, and it's flawless: High yield to the rich, NO risk to the rich, BILL goes to the taxpayers.

Astounding.

And a guy who was in the thick of this says he's not going to put America in the same position again?

Isn't that what domestic abusers tell their victims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think it is because these scandals are bipartisan.
When congresscritters from both parties are involved, scandals get swept under the rug more quickly. Neither party is interested in stirring up shit which can splash on them, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Senate etiquette rules
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 07:29 AM by mrJJ
Unwritten Senate etiquette rules? A surrogate has to do the job... Hard to do with Both Biden & O being sitting Senators..

I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Its the card they will play if they try to use Wright or Ayers again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC