Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Palin Isn't Committing Crimes Or Consorting With Terrorists-Then Why Can't We Monitor Her Emails?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:59 AM
Original message
If Palin Isn't Committing Crimes Or Consorting With Terrorists-Then Why Can't We Monitor Her Emails?
9/11 Changed Everything!

Shouldn't these same people be standing up today and insisting that if Sarah Palin has done nothing wrong, then she should have nothing to hide? If Sarah Palin isn't committing crimes or consorting with The Terrorists, then why would she care if we can monitor her emails? And if private companies such as Yahoo can access her emails -- as they can -- then she doesn't really have any "privacy" anyway, so what's the big deal if others read through her communications, too? Isn't that the authoritarian idiocy that has been spewed since The Day That 9/11 Changed Everything -- beginning with the Constitution -- to justify vesting secret and unchecked surveillance powers in our Great and Good Leaders?

more at:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/18/privacy/

more at:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great point!
That's all I heard from the reich during the illegal wiretap scandal's coming out party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. My Theory On The Hacking Of Palin's E-Mails Is That It Is A Rove Trick.......
it was timed to try and shift some of the story from the economy - where McCain is very weak - to blaming the Dems on something completely off the issues.

Correct me if I'm wrong but there was nothing really earth shattering that was revealed in her e-mails - was there?

Seems to me that these were cleansed first and then released.

Just sounds to Rovian for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. he is known for this
I would have to agree with you global1,
peace, kp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC