Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama staff leaves North Dakota

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:53 PM
Original message
Obama staff leaves North Dakota
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Barack Obama, who has deployed more than 50 staffers in North Dakota in an attempt to become the first Democratic presidential candidate to carry the state since 1964, is pulling out.

An Obama spokeswoman, Amy Brundage, confirmed Sunday that the campaign's North Dakota staffers were being sent to Minnesota and Wisconsin, where recent polls have shown a tight race between Obama and Republican John McCain.

She declined to say how many campaign workers were being shifted, but other Democratic activists put the number at more than 50. Obama has opened 11 North Dakota campaign offices and run television advertising in the state, which is unusual for a Democratic presidential candidate.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-21-obamanorthdakota_N.htm

Seems wise to focus resources on MN and WI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, it's a good call
I know it's not quite in keeping with the 50-State Strategy, but holding Wisconsin and Minnesota is much more important than trying for North Dakota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 50 state strategy was Dean's idea beyond the Presidential races
That included Senators, Reps, state senators/reps and local races like Governors, mayors, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a good decision. Better to work on Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet you there are volunteers in ND continuing the field operation, however.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 09:04 PM by beachmom
The organizers in my county in GA left, but the volunteers now manage the office, and pay the rent for it. Once you organize the grassroots, they will work on their own. So although I think it is smart to redirect PAID organizers to more battleground states, don't think that now nothing is happening in ND.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Minn and Wisconsin need a few more folks to quench the Sarah factor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Never should have been there in the first place
Obama isn't a miracle worker in terms of altering philosophical tendencies. North Dakota in 2004 was 13% liberal, 33% conservative. That's a weird breakdown because more than 50% self-identify as moderates. The gap of 20% from liberal to conservative is massive, more than any Democrat can overcome unless we win the national popular vote by at least 6% and probably closer to 8%.

The 13-33-54 breakdown suggests a moderate Democrat might have a chance in North Dakota, but that's not how Obama is viewed.

This is a classic case where you ignore early state polls and default to common sense. I know one friend who loaded up on betting McCain to win North Dakota. He was laughing about it last week, saying it was far superior to the best interest rate ever at any bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. North Dakota has two Democratic Senators, neither of which are particularly conservative
I think Obama had a shot in North Dakota until the Palin announcement which really excited the base for McSame. North Dakota and Montana were a good play in theory because forcing to McSame to defend those states would've required him to travel more and we all know that it's a lot harder to travel more when you're 72.

Unfortunately Palin really excites those 33% you are talking about and so the state isn't in play anymore. In hindsight it was a poor choice but there was good strategic value at the time. Fortunately North Carolina, Indiana, and Florida are trending towards Obama which is really putting McSame on defense in those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. There is a reason all those missle silos were put there to be
targets for a first strike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good for Barack. he tried..... this is a smart move IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC